Validation of VITEK 2 Version 4.01 Software for Detection, Identification, and Classification of Glycopeptide-Resistant Enterococci

ABSTRACT We evaluated the ability of the new VITEK 2 version 4.01 software to identify and detect glycopeptide-resistant enterococci compared to that of the reference broth microdilution method and to classify them into the vanA, vanB, vanC1, and vanC2 genotypes. Moreover, the accuracy of antimicrobial susceptibility testing with agents with improved potencies against glycopeptide-resistant enterococci was determined. A total of 121 enterococci were investigated. The new VITEK 2 software was able to identify 114 (94.2%) enterococcal strains correctly to the species level and to classify 119 (98.3%) enterococci correctly to the glycopeptide resistance genotype level. One Enterococcus casseliflavus strain and six Enterococcus faecium vanA strains with low-level resistance to vancomycin were identified with low discrimination, requiring additional tests. One of the vanA strains was misclassified as the vanB type, and one glycopeptide-susceptible E. facium wild type was misclassified as the vanA type. The overall essential agreements for antimicrobial susceptibility testing results were 94.2% for vancomycin, 95.9% for teicoplanin, 100% for quinupristin-dalfopristin and moxifloxacin, and 97.5% for linezolid. The rates of minor errors were 9% for teicoplanin and 5% for the other antibiotic agents. The identification and susceptibility data were produced within 4 h to 6 h 30 min and 8 h 15 min to 12 h 15 min. In conclusion, use of VITEK 2 version 4.01 software appears to be a reliable method for the identification and detection of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci as well as an improvement over the use of the former VITEK 2 database. However, a significant reduction in the detection time would be desirable.

[1]  W. Witte,et al.  Intra-hospital dissemination of quinupristin/dalfopristin- and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a paediatric ward of a German hospital. , 2003, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[2]  H. Endtz,et al.  Accuracy of the VITEK 2 System To Detect Glycopeptide Resistance in Enterococci , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  S. Handwerger,et al.  Inducible and constitutive expression of vanC-1-encoded resistance to vancomycin in Enterococcus gallinarum , 1995, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[4]  C. Salgado,et al.  Outcomes Associated With Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci: A Meta-Analysis , 2003, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[5]  Nnis System National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2003, issued August 2003. , 2003, American journal of infection control.

[6]  I. Autenrieth,et al.  Two episodes of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium outbreaks caused by two genetically different clones in a newborn intensive care unit. , 2004, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[7]  Ingo Klare,et al.  Occurrence and spread of antibiotic resistances in Enterococcus faecium. , 2003, International journal of food microbiology.

[8]  M. Bonora,et al.  Evaluation of the VITEK 2 System for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Medically Relevant Gram-Positive Cocci , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[9]  P. Courvalin,et al.  Detection of glycopeptide resistance genotypes and identification to the species level of clinically relevant enterococci by PCR , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[10]  Minoru Nishida,et al.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus by the VITEK 2 system, and comparison with two NCCLS reference methods. , 2004, Journal of medical microbiology.

[11]  J. Duval,et al.  Plasmid-mediated resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin in Enterococcus faecium. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  G. Dettori,et al.  Two-Center Collaborative Evaluation of the Performance of the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[13]  K. Ramotar,et al.  Comparison of phenotypic methods to identify enterococci intrinsically resistant to vancomycin (VanC VRE). , 2000, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[14]  Emilio Bouza,et al.  Evaluation of a New System, VITEK 2, for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterococci , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[15]  M. Ferraro Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing , 2001 .

[16]  Yoshiyuki Kawakami,et al.  Limitations of Vitek GPS-418 Cards in Exact Detection of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci with thevanB Genotype , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[17]  G. Funke,et al.  Performance of the New VITEK 2 GP Card for Identification of Medically Relevant Gram-Positive Cocci in a Routine Clinical Laboratory , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.