Building Bridges: Reflections on the problem of transfer of learning in mathematics

The takeup of opportunities for applying formal learning outside the school is often disappointing – to teachers, parents, employers, and many pupils. Not surprisingly, there is much controversy among researchers in mathematics education and related fields, as to the reasons. Here I argue that neither traditional nor constructivist views, with their simplistic faith in the basic continuity of knowledge across contexts, nor currently popular ‘insulationist’ views such as the strong form of situated cognition, which claims that transfer is basically not possible, are adequate. Instead, I analyse why transfer is problematical in principle, and undependable in practice. I recommend an alternative approach for building bridges between practices, based on analysing the discourses involved as systems of signs, and looking for appropriate points of inter-relation between them. In this reconceptualisation of the ‘problem’ of transfer, the role of affective factors, previously under-examined in the literature, is highlighted.

[1]  Wendy Hollway,et al.  Subjectivity and Method in Psychology: Gender, Meaning and Science , 1989 .

[2]  C. Hoyles,et al.  Tools in practice, mathematics in use , 1998 .

[3]  Robert W. Lawler,et al.  The Progressive Construction of Mind , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  A. Tsatsaroni,et al.  Linking the Cognitive and the Affective in Educational Research: cognitivist, psychoanalytic and post-structuralist models , 1996 .

[5]  Valerie Walkerdine,et al.  The Mastery Of Reason: Cognitive Development And The Production Of Rationality , 1990 .

[6]  J. Lave Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[7]  R. Pea Socializing the knowledge transfer problem , 1987 .

[8]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[9]  Denis Newman,et al.  The Construction Zone: Working for Cognitive Change in School , 1989 .

[10]  Valerie Walkerdine,et al.  The Mastery of Reason , 1988 .

[11]  Joanna O. Masingila,et al.  Mathematics learning and practice in and out of school: A framework for connecting these experiences , 1996 .

[12]  Jeff Evans,et al.  Language and “Subjectivity” in the Mathematics Classroom , 1994 .

[13]  Celia Hoyles,et al.  Windows on Mathematical Meanings: Learning Cultures and Computers , 1996 .

[14]  Basil Bernstein,et al.  Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity : theory, research, critique , 1997 .

[15]  J. Lave Teaching, as Learning, in Practice , 1996 .

[16]  Rosamund Sutherland,et al.  Mathematical competencies of GNVQ science students: the role of computers , 1998 .

[17]  Paul Ernest Mathematics Education and Philosophy : An International Perspective , 1994 .

[18]  H. Simon,et al.  Situated Learning and Education1 , 1996 .

[19]  Valerie Walkerdine Counting Girls Out , 1989 .

[20]  Celia Hoyles,et al.  The visibility of meanings: Modelling the mathematics of banking , 1996, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[21]  Jeff Evans,et al.  Adult mathematics and everyday life: building bridges and facilitating learning 'transfer' , 2000 .

[22]  J. Greeno,et al.  Transfer of situated learning , 1996 .

[23]  J. Lave,et al.  Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context , 1996 .

[24]  T. Cooper,et al.  The Construction of the Social Context of Mathematics Classrooms: A Sociolinguistic Analysis , 1998 .

[25]  David W. Carraher,et al.  Street mathematics and school mathematics , 1993 .

[26]  B. Lang,et al.  Do You Panic about Maths , 1981 .

[27]  J. Becker,et al.  Fear of the Unknowns@@@Do You Panic about Maths? Coping with Maths Anxiety , 1983 .

[28]  Nick Taylor,et al.  Schooling and everyday life: Knowledges sacred and profane , 1995 .

[29]  J. Boaler Open and Closed Mathematics: Student Experiences and Understandings , 1998 .