Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Homeland Security Research: A Risk‐Informed Methodology with Applications for the U.S. Coast Guard

This article describes a methodology for risk-informed benefit-cost analyses of homeland security research products. The methodology is field-tested with 10 research products developed for the U.S. Coast Guard. Risk-informed benefit-cost analysis is a tool for risk management that integrates elements of risk analysis, decision analysis, and benefit-cost analysis. The cost analysis methodology includes a full-cost accounting of research projects, starting with initial fundamental research costs and extending to the costs of implementation of the research products and, where applicable, training, maintenance, and upgrade costs. The benefits analysis methodology is driven by changes in costs and risks leading to five alternative models: cost savings at the same level of security, increased security at the same cost, signal detection improvements, risk reduction by deterrence, and value of information. The U.S. Coast Guard staff selected 10 research projects to test and generalize the methodology. Examples include tools to improve the detection of explosives, reduce the costs of harbor patrols, and provide better predictions of hurricane wind speeds and floods. Benefits models and estimates varied by research project and many input parameters of the benefit estimates were highly uncertain, so risk analysis for sensitivity testing and simulation was important. Aggregating across the 10 research products, we found an overall median net present value of about $385 million, with a range from $54 million (5th percentile) to $877 million (95th percentile). Lessons learned are provided for future applications.

[1]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Efficient Algorithms to Solve Bayesian Stackelberg Games for Security Applications , 2008, AAAI.

[2]  Adam Rose Macroeconomic consequences of terrorist attacks: estimation for the analysis of policies and rules , 2015 .

[3]  Mark A. Saunders,et al.  Normalized Hurricane Damage in the United States: 1900–2005 , 2008 .

[4]  M. Ogrodniczak,et al.  Possibilities of the spatial information system usage by the Internal Security Agency , 2016 .

[5]  R. Pielke,et al.  Normalized Hurricane Damages in the United States: 1925-95 , 1998 .

[6]  J. Whitehead,et al.  One million dollars per mile? The opportunity costs of Hurricane evacuation , 2003 .

[7]  J. A. Stone,et al.  Peer Reviewed: Ion Mobility Spectrometers in National Defense , 2004 .

[8]  Norman W. Scheffner,et al.  ADCIRC: An Advanced Three-Dimensional Circulation Model for Shelves, Coasts, and Estuaries. Report 1. Theory and Methodology of ADCIRC-2DDI and ADCIRC-3DL. , 1992 .

[9]  Ralph L Keeney,et al.  A Value Model for Evaluating Homeland Security Decisions , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Brian Michael Jenkins,et al.  Bus Operator Awareness Research and Development Training Program , 2012 .

[11]  H H Hill,et al.  Evaluation of false positive responses by mass spectrometry and ion mobility spectrometry for the detection of trace explosives in complex samples. , 2013, Analytica chimica acta.

[12]  Scott Farrow,et al.  Risk-Informed Benefit-Cost Analysis , 2017 .

[13]  Mark A. Moore,et al.  The choice of the social discount rate and the opportunity cost of public funds , 2013 .

[14]  A. Rose,et al.  Economic Consequence Analysis of Disasters , 2017 .

[15]  Eva D. Regnier,et al.  Public Evacuation Decisions and Hurricane Track Uncertainty , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Lisa A. Robinson,et al.  The Income Elasticity of the Value per Statistical Life: Transferring Estimates between High and Low Income Populations , 2011, Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis.

[17]  Scott Farrow,et al.  THE ECONOMICS OF HOMELAND SECURITY EXPENDITURES: FOUNDATIONAL EXPECTED COST‐EFFECTIVENESS APPROACHES , 2007 .