A Behavior Analytic Analogue of Learning to Use Synonyms, Syntax, and Parts of Speech

Matching-to-sample and sequence training procedures were used to develop responding to stimulus classes that were considered analogous to 3 aspects of verbal behavior: identifying synonyms and parts of speech, and using syntax. Matching-to-sample procedures were used to train 12 paired associates from among 24 stimuli. These pairs were analogous to synonyms. Then, sequence characteristics were trained to 6 of the stimuli. The result was the formation of 3 classes of 4 stimuli, with the classes controlling a sequence response analogous to a simple ordering syntax: first, second, and third. Matching-to-sample procedures were then used to add 4 stimuli to each class. These stimuli, without explicit sequence training, also began to control the same sequence responding as the other members of their class. Thus, three 8-member functionally equivalent sequence classes were formed. These classes were considered to be analogous to parts of speech. Further testing revealed three 8-member equivalence classes and 512 different sequences of first, second, and third. The study indicated that behavior analytic procedures may be used to produce some generative aspects of verbal behavior related to simple syntax and semantics.

[1]  H. A. Mackay Stimulus equivalence in rudimentary reading and spelling , 1985 .

[2]  David E. Greenway,et al.  The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. , 1994, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  R. Lazar Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  G. Alessi Generative strategies and teaching for generalization , 1987, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[5]  H. Schlinger,et al.  Function-Altering Effects of Contingency-Specifying Stimuli , 1987, The Behavior analyst.

[6]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior , 1980 .

[7]  Noam Chomsky Review of B.F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior , 1959 .

[8]  G. Tucker,et al.  A primer of verbal behavior : an operant view , 1977 .

[9]  M. Sidman,et al.  Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  A. Charles Catania,et al.  The Taxonomy of Verbal Behavior , 1998 .

[11]  L Fields,et al.  The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence classes. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  M. Sidman,et al.  Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. , 2000, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  O. Wirth,et al.  Stability of functional equivalence and stimulus equivalence: effects of baseline reversals. , 2002, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  P N Chase,et al.  Speed analyses of stimulus equivalence. , 1996, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  J. Michael Two Kinds of Verbal Behavior Plus a Possible Third , 1985, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[16]  P N Chase,et al.  The relationship between stimulus equivalence and verbal behavior , 1991, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[17]  S. Hayes,et al.  Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. , 1988, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  B. Roche,et al.  A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus function in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. , 1997, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  B. Skinner Contingencies of reinforcement : a theoretical analysis , 1969 .

[20]  D. Barnes,et al.  9 New Procedures for establishing emergent matching performances in children and adults: Implications for stimulus equivalence , 1996 .

[21]  Philip N Chase,et al.  Novelty, stimulus control, and operant variability , 2002, The Behavior analyst.

[22]  W. Vaughan,et al.  Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons , 1988 .

[23]  M. Layng,et al.  Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing, Matching-to-Sample Testing, and Emergent Relations , 2001 .

[24]  S. Hayes,et al.  Language and Cognition: Constructing an Alternative Approach Within the Behavioral Tradition , 2002 .

[25]  Murray Sidman,et al.  Equivalence Relations and Behavior: A Research Story , 1994 .

[26]  D. Crowne,et al.  Experimental foundations of clinical psychology , 1964 .

[27]  M. Sidman,et al.  Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.