Why the Data Train Needs Semantic Rails

While catchphrases such as big data, smart data, dataintensive science, or smart dust highlight different aspects, they share a common theme: Namely, a shift towards a data-centric perspective in which the synthesis and analysis of data at an ever-increasing spatial, temporal, and thematic resolution promises new insights, while, at the same time, reducing the need for strong domain theories as starting points. In terms of the envisioned methodologies, those catchphrases tend to emphasize the role of predictive analytics, i.e., statistical techniques including data mining and machine learning, as well as supercomputing. Interestingly, however, while this perspective takes the availability of data as a given, it does not answer the question how one would discover the required data in today’s chaotic information universe, how one would understand which datasets can be meaningfully integrated, and how to communicate the results to humans and machines alike. The Semantic Web addresses these questions. In the following, we argue why the data train needs semantic rails. We point out that making sense of data and gaining new insights works best if inductive and deductive techniques go hand-in-hand instead of competing over the prerogative of interpretation.

[1]  Cosmin Stroe,et al.  AgreementMaker: Efficient Matching for Large Real-World Schemas and Ontologies , 2009, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[2]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[3]  Min Xu,et al.  Ontology Based Annotation of Contextualized Vital Signs , 2013, ICBO.

[4]  Martin Gaedke,et al.  Silk - A Link Discovery Framework for the Web of Data , 2009, LDOW.

[5]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Exploratory search , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[6]  Holk Cruse,et al.  Prerational Intelligence: Interdisciplinary perspectives on the behavior of natural and artificial systems , 2000 .

[7]  Oscar Corcho,et al.  The semantic web : semantics and big data : 10th international conference, ESWC 2013, Montpellier, France, May 26-30, 2013 : proceedings , 2013 .

[8]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Ontology Alignment for Linked Open Data , 2010, SEMWEB.

[9]  Thomas Keays,et al.  Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist , 2008 .

[10]  Jérôme David,et al.  The Alignment API 4.0 , 2011, Semantic Web.

[11]  Jim Hendler Peta Vs. Meta , 2013, Big Data.

[12]  Anthony J. G. Hey,et al.  The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery [Point of View] , 2011 .

[13]  Oscar Corcho,et al.  The Semantic Web: Semantics and Big Data , 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[14]  Pascal Hitzler,et al.  Logical Linked Data Compression , 2013, ESWC.

[15]  Tony Hey,et al.  The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery , 2009 .

[16]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  A reasonable Semantic Web , 2010, Semantic Web.

[17]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group , 2012, J. Web Semant..

[18]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  Key Ingredients for Your Next Semantics Elevator Talk , 2012, ER Workshops.

[19]  Francis E. Putz,et al.  Critical need for new definitions of “forest” and “forest degradation” in global climate change agreements , 2009 .

[20]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Web science: an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the web , 2008, CACM.

[21]  Dean Allemang,et al.  Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist - Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL, Second Edition , 2011 .

[22]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Prospects for VGI Research and the Emerging Fourth Paradigm , 2013 .

[23]  Kay Chen Tan,et al.  Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 10023 , 2016 .

[24]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Towards a pattern science for the Semantic Web , 2010, Semantic Web.

[25]  Ipke Wachsmuth,et al.  The Concept of Intelligence in AI , 2000 .