Enhancing seismic risk mitigation decisions: a motivational approach

Implementing seismic risk mitigation is a major challenge in many earthquake-prone regions, despite the availability of a significant number of risk reduction measures such as technical design solutions and regulatory frameworks that include building codes, policies and regulations necessary to facilitate successful risk reduction activities. However, building owners have been found unwilling to retrofit their earthquake-prone buildings. The objective of this research is to investigate how to enhance buildings owners’ earthquake hazard preparedness decisions by adopting a motivational approach in order to reduce their vulnerability to earthquake risks. A multiple case studies approach was adopted and interviews conducted with the various stakeholders involved in seismic adjustments decisions. Significant intrinsic and extrinsic interventions such as intensifying and promoting the use of critical awareness motivators, financial and property market-based incentives necessary to enhance building owners’ decisions were revealed from the analysis of the qualitative data. These revealed intrinsic and extrinsic interventions offer plausible explanations regarding how human motivational orientation can be used to influence disaster preparedness decisions by increasing the salience of seismic risk issues.

[1]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Perceived Characteristics of Environmental Hazards , 1994, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[2]  Branco Ponomariov,et al.  Earthquake Mitigation Decisions and Consequences , 2006 .

[3]  Tiziana Rossetto,et al.  The social psychology of seismic hazard adjustment: re-evaluating the international literature , 2010 .

[4]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Household Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments: A Comparison of Residents in Two States , 2000, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[5]  Peter B. Nahkies Seismic upgrading - meeting the economic challenge , 2009 .

[6]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Perceived Stakeholder Role Relationships and Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments1 , 2007, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[7]  D. Paton Disaster preparedness: a social‐cognitive perspective , 2003 .

[8]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[9]  Ming-Shan Chen,et al.  Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis undergoing whole lung lavage in south Taiwan--a case report. , 2004, Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists.

[10]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  Protection Motivation and Risk Communication , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Douglas Paton,et al.  Community resilience: Integrating individual, community and societal perspectives , 2008 .

[12]  V. Vroom Work and motivation , 1964 .

[13]  A. M. P. Mollema,et al.  Building and Housing , 1962 .

[14]  David J. Dowrick,et al.  Earthquake risk reduction actions for New Zealand , 2003 .

[15]  Courtney LaFountain Health risk reporting , 2004 .

[16]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  Sociological and behavioural impediments to earthquake hazard mitigation , 2010 .

[17]  Carla S. Prater,et al.  Why People Do What They Do to Protect Against Earthquake Risk: Perceptions of Hazard Adjustment Attributes , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  J. Mulilis,et al.  Personal Responsibility for Tornado Preparedness: Commitment or Choice?1 , 2001 .

[19]  D. Paton Disaster resilience: Integrating individual, community, institutional, and environmental perspectives , 2006 .

[20]  Henry W. Fischer What Emergency Management Officials Should Know To Enhance Mitigation and Effective Disaster Response , 1996 .

[21]  John-Paul Mulilis,et al.  Negative Threat Appeals and Earthquake Preparedness: A Person-Relative-to-Event (PrE) Model of Coping With Threat , 1995 .

[22]  M. Kuttschreuter Communicating environmental risk in multiethnic communities , 2005 .

[23]  Robert P. Cavalier Personal Motivation: A Model for Decision Making , 2000 .

[24]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Politics of Hazard Mitigation , 2000 .

[25]  M. Douglas,et al.  Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers , 1983 .

[26]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States , 2013 .

[27]  Douglas Paton,et al.  Modelling Community Preparation for Natural Hazards: Understanding Hazard Cognitions , 2009 .

[28]  E. Higgins Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle , 1998 .

[29]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. , 1975, The Journal of psychology.

[30]  D. Sheridan,et al.  Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards , 2010 .

[31]  A. Maslow Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[32]  D. Paton Preparing for natural hazards: The role of community trust , 2007 .

[33]  Carl L. Bankston,et al.  Federal involvement in local school districts , 2005 .

[34]  Claudio R. Nigg,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behavior Within the Stages of the Transtheoretical Model: Latent Structural Modeling of Stage-Specific Prediction Patterns in Physical Activity , 2007 .