Scaling of forced magnetic reconnection in the Hall-magnetohydrodynamic Taylor problem

Two-dimensional, incompressible, zero guide-field, nonlinear Hall-MHD (magnetohydrodynamical) simulations are used to investigate the scaling of the rate of forced magnetic reconnection in the so-called Taylor problem. In this problem, a small-amplitude boundary perturbation is suddenly applied to a tearing stable, slab plasma equilibrium; the perturbation being such as to drive magnetic reconnection within the plasma. This type of reconnection, which is not due to an intrinsic plasma instability, is generally known as “forced reconnection.” The inclusion of the Hall term in the plasma Ohm’s law is found to greatly accelerate the rate of magnetic reconnection. In the linear Hall-MHD regime, the peak instantaneous reconnection rate is found to scale like dΨ/dt∼diη1/3Ⅺ0, where Ψ is the reconnected magnetic flux, di the collisionless ion skin depth, η the resistivity, and Ⅺ0 the amplitude of the boundary perturbation. In the nonlinear Hall-MHD regime, the peak reconnection rate is found to scale like dΨ/dt∼d...

[1]  Harold P. Furth,et al.  Finite‐Resistivity Instabilities of a Sheet Pinch , 1963 .

[2]  R. Denton,et al.  The scaling of collisionless, magnetic reconnection for large systems , 1999 .

[3]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Neutral line model of substorms: Past results and present view , 1996 .

[4]  Ottaviani,et al.  Nonlinear collisionless magnetic reconnection. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[5]  Drake,et al.  Ion-controlled collisionless magnetic reconnection. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[6]  J. Dorelli Effects of Hall electric fields on the saturation of forced antiparallel magnetic field merging , 2003 .

[7]  James F. Drake,et al.  The role of electron dissipation on the rate of collisionless magnetic reconnection , 1998 .

[8]  A. Bhattacharjee,et al.  Scaling of collisionless forced reconnection. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[9]  James F. Drake,et al.  Alfvénic collisionless magnetic reconnection and the Hall term , 2001 .

[10]  M. Ottaviani,et al.  Recent advances in collisionless magnetic reconnection , 2002 .

[11]  T. Terasawa Hall current effect on tearing mode instability , 1983 .

[12]  Douglas S. Harned,et al.  Accurate semi-implicit treatment of the hall effect in magnetohydrodynamic computations , 1989 .

[13]  James F. Drake,et al.  Transition to whistler mediated magnetic reconnection , 1994 .

[14]  R. Fitzpatrick Plasma parameter scaling of the error-field penetration threshold in tokamaks , 2002 .

[15]  Michael Hesse,et al.  Geospace Environmental Modeling (GEM) magnetic reconnection challenge , 2001 .

[16]  Kazunari Shibata,et al.  New observational facts about solar flares from Yohkoh studies — Evidence of magnetic reconnection and a unified model of flares , 1996 .

[17]  Louis J. Lanzerotti,et al.  Solar system plasma physics , 1979 .

[18]  I. Craig,et al.  Dynamic Planar Magnetic Reconnection Solutions for Incompressible Plasmas , 1999 .

[19]  F. Waelbroeck Current sheets and nonlinear growth of the m=1 kink-tearing mode , 1989 .

[20]  James Drake,et al.  Two-fluid theory of collisionless magnetic reconnection , 1997 .

[21]  I. Craig,et al.  Hall current effects in dynamic magnetic reconnection solutions , 2003 .

[22]  Eugene N. Parker,et al.  Sweet's mechanism for merging magnetic fields in conducting fluids , 1957 .

[23]  Dieter Biskamp,et al.  Magnetic Reconnection via Current Sheets , 1986 .

[24]  B. Coppi,et al.  Dynamics of the Geomagnetic Tail , 1966 .

[25]  Ashis Bhattacharjee,et al.  Forced reconnection and current sheet formation in Taylor’s model , 1992 .

[26]  Russell M. Kulsrud,et al.  Forced magnetic reconnection , 1985 .