Technical note: Fu–Liou–Gu and Corti–Peter model performance evaluation for radiative retrievals from cirrus clouds

Abstract. We compare, for the first time, the performance of a simplified atmospheric radiative transfer algorithm package, the Corti–Peter (CP) model, versus the more complex Fu–Liou–Gu (FLG) model, for resolving top-of-the-atmosphere radiative forcing characteristics from single-layer cirrus clouds obtained from the NASA Micro-Pulse Lidar Network database in 2010 and 2011 at Singapore and in Greenbelt, Maryland, USA, in 2012. Specifically, CP simplifies calculation of both clear-sky longwave and shortwave radiation through regression analysis applied to radiative calculations, which contributes significantly to differences between the two. The results of the intercomparison show that differences in annual net top-of-the-atmosphere (TOA) cloud radiative forcing can reach 65 %. This is particularly true when land surface temperatures are warmer than 288 K, where the CP regression analysis becomes less accurate. CP proves useful for first-order estimates of TOA cirrus cloud forcing, but may not be suitable for quantitative accuracy, including the absolute sign of cirrus cloud daytime TOA forcing that can readily oscillate around zero globally.

[1]  J. Comstock,et al.  Cirrus Radiative Properties in the Tropical Western Pacific , 2001 .

[2]  K. Liou.  Influence of Cirrus Clouds on Weather and Climate Processes: A Global Perspective , 1986 .

[3]  Q. Fu,et al.  Multiple Scattering Parameterization in Thermal Infrared Radiative Transfer , 1997 .

[4]  G. Mace,et al.  Cloud properties and radiative effects of the Asian summer monsoon derived from A‐Train data , 2014 .

[5]  Evaluation of a GCM cirrus parameterization using satellite observations , 1994 .

[6]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[7]  Simone Lolli,et al.  Evaluating Light Rain Drop Size Estimates from Multiwavelength Micropulse Lidar Network Profiling , 2013 .

[8]  P. Keckhut,et al.  Midlatitude cirrus classification at Rome Tor Vergata through a multichannel Raman-Mie-Rayleigh lidar , 2013 .

[9]  K. Sassen,et al.  Cirrus Cloud Simulation Using Explicit Microphysics and Radiation. Part I: Model Description , 1998 .

[10]  K. Sassen,et al.  A Midlatitude Cirrus Cloud Climatology from the Facility for Atmospheric Remote Sensing. Part I: Macrophysical and Synoptic Properties , 2001 .

[11]  Simone Lolli,et al.  Assessment of aerosol optical property and radiative effect for the layer decoupling cases over the northern South China Sea during the 7‐SEAS/Dongsha Experiment , 2016 .

[12]  Andreas Dobler,et al.  The radiation budget in a regional climate model , 2011 .

[13]  Cirrus cloud radiative characteristics from continuous MPLNET profiling at GSFC in 2012 , 2016 .

[14]  Ellsworth J. Welton,et al.  Measurements of aerosol vertical profiles and optical properties during INDOEX 1999 using micropulse lidars , 2002 .

[15]  Glenn S. Diskin,et al.  Relationships between Ice Water Content and Volume Extinction Coefficient from In Situ Observations for Temperatures from 0° to −86°C: Implications for Spaceborne Lidar Retrievals , 2014 .

[16]  Simone Lolli,et al.  High Spectral Resolution Lidar and MPLNET Micro Pulse Lidar aerosol optical property retrieval intercomparison during the 2012 7-SEAS field campaign at Singapore , 2014, Remote Sensing.

[17]  K. Krüger,et al.  Cirrus, contrails, and ice supersaturated regions in high pressure systems at northern mid latitudes , 2007 .

[18]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  Global characterization of cirrus clouds using CALIPSO data , 2008 .

[19]  Yu Gu,et al.  Cirrus cloud simulations using WRF with improved radiation parameterization and increased vertical resolution , 2011 .

[20]  B. Holben,et al.  Origin, transport, and vertical distribution of atmospheric pollutants over the northern South China Sea during the 7-SEAS/Dongsha Experiment , 2013 .

[21]  Yu Gu,et al.  Parameterization of Cloud–Radiation Processes in the UCLA General Circulation Model , 2003 .

[22]  David D. Turner,et al.  Full-Time, Eye-Safe Cloud and Aerosol Lidar Observation at Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Sites: Instruments and Data Analysis , 2013 .

[23]  Soo Chin Liew,et al.  Daytime Top-of-the-Atmosphere Cirrus Cloud Radiative Forcing Properties at Singapore , 2017 .

[24]  Q. Fu,et al.  On the correlated k-distribution method for radiative transfer in nonhomogeneous atmospheres , 1992 .

[25]  P. Seifert,et al.  Climatological and radiative properties of midlatitude cirrus clouds derived by automatic evaluation of lidar measurements , 2016 .

[26]  Jasper R. Lewis,et al.  Overview of MPLNET Version 3 Cloud Detection. , 2016, Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology.

[27]  K. Sassen,et al.  Global distribution of cirrus clouds from CloudSat/Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) measurements , 2008 .

[28]  T. Peter,et al.  A simple model for cloud radiative forcing , 2009 .

[29]  James R. Campbell,et al.  Midlatitude cirrus cloud radiative forcing over China , 2010 .

[30]  Kenneth Sassen,et al.  Subvisual-Thin Cirrus Lidar Dataset for Satellite Verification and Climatological Research , 1992 .

[31]  A. Ekman,et al.  Ubiquity and impact of thin mid-level clouds in the tropics , 2016, Nature Communications.

[32]  Yu Gu,et al.  Daytime Cirrus Cloud Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Forcing Properties at a Midlatitude Site and their Global Consequence. , 2016, Journal of applied meteorology and climatology.