论文信息 - An axiomatic characterization of the ranking based on the h-index and some other bibliometric rankings of authors

An axiomatic characterization of the ranking based on the h-index and some other bibliometric rankings of authors

In the last few years, many new bibliometric rankings or indices have been proposed for comparing the output of scientific researchers. We propose a formal framework in which rankings can be axiomatically characterized. We then present a characterization of some popular rankings. We argue that such analyses can help the user of a ranking to choose one that is adequate in the context where she/he is working.

Thierry Marchant | T. Marchant

[1] G. Chapron,et al. Open, Fair, and Free Journal Ranking for Researchers , 2006 .

[2] J. E. Hirsch,et al. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[3] Yannis Manolopoulos,et al. Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks , 2007, Scientometrics.

[4] L. Egghe,et al. Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[5] Hajime Eto. Interdisciplinary information input and output of a nano-technology project , 2004, Scientometrics.

[6] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. On the h-index - A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact , 2006, Scientometrics.