Investigation of long-term hydrophobic recovery of plasma modified polypropylene

This study concerns the surface and adhesive properties of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) modified by an electric discharge plasma and affected by long-term hydrophobic recovery of the polymer surface after modification. The investigations were focused on the change in polarity of the modified polymer expressed by the polar fraction as well as on the decrease in the surface free energy, its polar component and mechanical work of adhesion (Am) to polyvinyl acetate. Am of modified iPP to polyvinyl acetate as a function of polar fraction can be described by a mathematical formula. It has been confirmed that the most intensive decrease in the surface and adhesive properties investigated is produced by the long-term hydrophobic recovery of the polymer appears in the course of the first 30 days after its modification. During subsequent aging the process of polymer hydrophobic recovery proceeds more slowly. It has been found that the value of surface and adhesive properties of iPP as well as the dynamics of the decrease in these properties during hydrophobic recovery of the surface after modification is, in the main, dependent on the iPP crystallinity.

[1]  N. Brown,et al.  Modification of the surface properties of a polypropylene (PP) film using an air dielectric barrier discharge plasma , 2002 .

[2]  Ricardo Baumhardt-Neto,et al.  Adhesion of polypropylene treated with nitric and sulfuric acid , 1997 .

[3]  M. Green,et al.  Characterisation and comparison of industrially pre-treated homopolymer polypropylene, HF 135M , 2002 .

[4]  I. Novák,et al.  Surface modification of polypropylene by chromylchloride , 1994 .

[5]  D. Bergbreiter,et al.  Polypropylene Surface Modification by Entrapment Functionalization , 1998 .

[6]  M. Strobel,et al.  Aging of air-corona-treated polypropylene film , 1991 .

[7]  H. Kaczmarek,et al.  The influence of side groups and polarity of polymers on the kind and effectiveness of their surface modification by air plasma action , 2002 .

[8]  Z. Hruška,et al.  Ageing of the oxyfluorinated polypropylene surface: evolution of the acid–base surface characteristics with time , 2000 .

[9]  W. Unger,et al.  Improvement in polymer adhesivity by low and normal pressure plasma surface modification , 1993 .

[10]  Y. Ikada,et al.  Surface modification of polymers by grafting , 1998 .

[11]  L. Wadsworth,et al.  Corona treatment of polyolefin films—A review , 1999 .

[12]  I. Novák.  Adhesive properties of poly(propylene) modified in bulk , 1996 .

[13]  R. Weiss,et al.  Method for Hydroxylation and Esterification of Interior Sites of Polyolefinic Films , 1999 .

[14]  E. Prinz,et al.  Surface modification of polymer materials by transient gas discharges at atmospheric pressure , 1998 .

[15]  L. Léger,et al.  Enhanced Adhesion between Polypropylene and Polyamide-6: Role of Interfacial Nucleation of the β-Crystalline Form of Polypropylene , 1997 .

[16]  D. Bergbreiter,et al.  Surface Functionalized Polypropylene: Synthesis, Characterization, and Adhesion Properties , 2001 .

[17]  C. Ha,et al.  Dynamic mechanical properties of polypropylene‐g‐maleic anhydride and ethylene–propylene–diene terpolymer blends: Effect of blend preparation methods , 2000 .