Mode-specific eco-efficiency analysis of the freight transportation in the USA: an integrated life cycle assessment and linear programming approach

In this paper, a mode-specific life cycle assessment of the freight transportation impacts associated with the US manufacturing sector's economic activities is performed considering cradle-to-gate life cycle scope. The 276 US manufacturing sectors' impacts on the four transportation modes (air, rail, truck and water) are considered as the problem scope and results are aggregated into 53 major manufacturing sectors. After the life cycle impacts are quantified, each mode's eco-efficiency assessment is quantified with data envelopment analysis (DEA). Three major impact categories (GHG emissions, energy and water consumption) are considered along with the economic output. Results indicated that among the four modes: truck transportation was found to be responsible for 48% to 60% of total environmental impacts which were triggered by the manufacturing sectors. On the other hand, rail and air were found to have 20% to 21% share in the total impact of four modes depending on the impact category.

[1]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Achieving Reductions in Greenhouse Gases in the U.S. Road Transportation Sector , 2014 .

[2]  William L. Weber,et al.  Total factor productivity growth in manufacturing: a regional approach using linear programming , 1999 .

[3]  Matti Melanen,et al.  How Can the Eco‐efficiency of a Region be Measured and Monitored? , 2005 .

[4]  K. Kerstens,et al.  Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches , 1996 .

[5]  Ilton Curty Jr. Leal,et al.  A data envelopment analysis approach to choose transport modes based on eco-efficiency , 2012, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[6]  Gumersindo Feijoo,et al.  Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis of grape production for vinification in the Rías Baixas appellation (NW Spain) , 2012 .

[7]  Shawna Grosskopf,et al.  Productivity and efficiency in the US: effects of business cycles and public capital , 2000 .

[8]  M. Lenzen,et al.  Companies on the Scale , 2009 .

[9]  W. Leontief Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach , 1970 .

[10]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Accounting for ecosystem services in Life Cycle Assessment, Part II: toward an ecologically based LCA. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Samer Madanat,et al.  Comparison of life-cycle energy and emissions footprints of passenger transportation in metropolitan regions , 2010 .

[12]  Chandler Stolp,et al.  Strengths and weaknesses of data envelopment analysis : an urban and regional perspective , 1990 .

[13]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Sustainability assessment of U.S. manufacturing sectors: an economic input output-based frontier approach , 2013 .

[14]  N. Pelletier,et al.  Life Cycle Thinking, Measurement and Management for Food System Sustainability. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  A. Horvath,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of high-speed rail: the case of California , 2010 .

[16]  Ian Vázquez-Rowe,et al.  Eco-efficiency assessment of the Peruvian anchoveta steel and wooden fleets using the LCA+DEA framework , 2014 .

[17]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Economic Input–Output Models for Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment , 1998 .

[18]  T. Hertel,et al.  Is Local Food More Environmentally Friendly? The GHG Emissions Impacts of Consuming Imported versus Domestically Produced Food , 2014 .

[19]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Motor Vehicles and Passenger Car Bodies Sector: Life Cycle Assessment Using Economic Input-Output Analysis , 1998 .

[20]  Guanghui Zhou,et al.  Measuring energy efficiency performance of China's transport sector: A data envelopment analysis approach , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Halil Cetiner,et al.  LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF A COMPLETE CAR : THE MERCEDES-BENZ APPROACH , 1997 .

[22]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Freight Transportation in the U.S. (11 pp) , 2006 .

[23]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Charles C Reith,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of an agricultural research complex. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  W. Krewitt,et al.  Application of a Hybrid-Approach to the Life Cycle Inventory Analysis of a Freight Transport Task , 1998 .

[26]  G. Huppes,et al.  A Framework for Quantified Eco‐efficiency Analysis , 2005 .

[27]  Seock-Jin Hong,et al.  An efficiency study of airlines and air cargo/passenger divisions: a DEA approach , 2010 .

[28]  Angel B. Ruiz,et al.  An integrated approach for sustainable supply chain planning , 2015, Comput. Oper. Res..

[29]  L. Cherchye,et al.  Legitimately Diverse, Yet Comparable: On Synthesizing Social Inclusion Performance in the EU , 2004 .

[30]  S. Joshi Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques , 1999 .

[31]  Ju Dong Park,et al.  Development of an Aggregate Air Quality Index Using a PCA-Based Method: A Case Study of the US Transportation Sector , 2015 .

[32]  Martin W. P. Savelsbergh,et al.  Carbon-aware transport and logistics , 2014, EURO J. Transp. Logist..

[33]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[34]  Paul R. Wyrwoll,et al.  World Business Council on Sustainable Development (WBCSD) , 2012 .

[35]  Nam Seok Kim,et al.  Toward a Better Methodology for Assessing CO2 Emissions for Intermodal and Truck-only Freight Systems: A European Case Study , 2014 .

[36]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[37]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Modal Freight Transport Required for Production of US Goods and Services , 2011 .

[38]  O. Tatari,et al.  upply chain sustainability assessment of the U . S . food manufacturing ectors : A life cycle-based frontier approach , 2013 .

[39]  Roger Gorham,et al.  Sustainable urban transport: Four innovative directions , 2006 .

[40]  Kazuhiko Hasegawa,et al.  Inland transportation system planning by life cycle impact assessment: a case study , 2000 .

[41]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Measuring Eco‐efficiency of Production with Data Envelopment Analysis , 2005 .

[42]  Claus Hedegaard Sørensen,et al.  The Impact of Governance Modes on Sustainable Transport: The Case of Bus Transport in Greater Manchester, UK , 2010 .

[43]  Giorgia Oggioni,et al.  Eco-efficiency of the world cement industry: A data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[44]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Eco-Efficiency of Construction Materials: Data Envelopment Analysis , 2012 .

[45]  M. Kortelainen,et al.  Dynamic environmental performance analysis: A Malmquist index approach , 2008 .

[46]  Murray Patterson,et al.  Aggregate eco-efficiency indices for New Zealand--a principal components analysis. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[47]  Anke Arnaud,et al.  Innovation for sustainability: the transformation of the transportation system , 2010 .

[48]  Michael Spielmann,et al.  Life Cycle Inventories of Transport Services: Background Data for Freight Transport (10 pp) , 2005 .

[49]  Omer Tatari,et al.  A dynamic modeling approach to highway sustainability: Strategies to reduce overall impact , 2012 .