Educating Teenage Drivers in the Pacific Northwest Regarding the Dangers of Distracted Driving

The goal of this outreach project was to examine driver distraction among high school and college students in the Pacific Northwest. Specifically, to identify secondary tasks they consider distracting and determine their self-reported engagement in those same secondary tasks while driving. An interactive presentation was developed and administered to 2,500 younger drivers (approximately 600 participants in each of the four states Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington). Younger Drivers were recruited from high schools and universities in each state. Of those participants, 2,378 younger drivers responded to a pre- and post-survey administered immediately before and two weeks after the presentation. The purpose of the survey was to measure the degree to which the interactive presentation improved younger driver perspectives regarding the hazards of distracted driving. Results indicated that the interactive presentation positively influenced younger driver perspectives, meaning that after the interactive presentation, younger drivers were more likely to correctly identify different types of distracted driving.

[1]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[2]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  NHTSA DRIVER DISTRACTION RESEARCH: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE , 2001 .

[4]  John Vavrik,et al.  The impact of hands-free message reception/response on driving task performance. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  John D. Lee,et al.  Designing Feedback to Mitigate Distraction , 2009 .

[6]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Mitigating driver distraction with retrospective and concurrent feedback. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[8]  S. Vosniadou Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. , 1994 .

[9]  John D Lee,et al.  Extending parental mentoring using an event-triggered video intervention in rural teen drivers. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[10]  Michael J Kallan,et al.  Peer passengers: how do they affect teen crashes? , 2012, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[11]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Acceptance of and engagement in risky driving behaviors by teenagers. , 2004, Adolescence.

[12]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[13]  E R Vingilis,et al.  School-based programmes for the prevention of drinking and driving: issues and results. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Robert D. Foss,et al.  Distracted Driving Among Newly Licensed Teen Drivers , 2012 .

[15]  John D Lee,et al.  Technology and teen drivers. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[16]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2006 .

[17]  Terry C Lansdown,et al.  Individual differences during driver secondary task performance: verbal protocol and visual allocation findings. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Robert D. Foss,et al.  Short-term effects of a teenage driver cell phone restriction. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.