Evaluation of Hydraulics and Downstream Fish Migration at Run-of-River Hydropower Plants with Horizontal Bar Rack Bypass Systems by Using CFD

Anthropogenic structures often block or delay the downstream migration of fish in rivers, thereby affecting their populations. A potential solution at run-of-river hydropower plants (HPPs) is the construction of a fish guidance structure in combination with a bypass system located at its downstream end. Crucial to fish guidance efficiency and thus to fish behavior are the hydraulic flow conditions in front of the fish guidance structure and upstream of the bypass entrance, which have not thus far been investigated in depth. The present study aims to extend the knowledge about the flow conditions at these structures. Based on the results of 3D numerical simulations of two idealized block-type HPPs with horizontal bar rack bypass systems, the flow conditions were examined, and the fish guidance efficiency was predicted. Herein, a new method was used to represent the fish guidance structure in the numerical model. The results show that the approach flow to fish guidance structures at block-type HPPs varies significantly along their length, and areas with unfavorable flow conditions for downstream fish migration frequently occur according to common guidelines. Subsequently, eight variations were performed to investigate the effect of key components on the flow field, e.g., the bypass discharge. Finally, the results were compared with literature data and discussed.

[1]  J. Geist,et al.  Bigger than expected: Species- and size-specific passage of fish through hydropower screens , 2023, Ecological Engineering.

[2]  K. Schwarzwälder,et al.  Combining Fish Passage and Sediment Bypassing: A Conceptual Solution for Increased Sustainability of Dams and Reservoirs , 2022, Water.

[3]  A. Peter,et al.  Protection and guidance of downstream moving fish with horizontal bar rack bypass systems , 2022, Ecological engineering.

[4]  R. Boes,et al.  Field Investigation of Hydraulics and Fish Guidance Efficiency of a Horizontal Bar Rack-Bypass System , 2022, Water.

[5]  J. Walde,et al.  A Physical and Behavioral Barrier for Enhancing Fish Downstream Migration at Hydropower Dams: The Flexible FishProtector , 2022, Water.

[6]  J. Watz,et al.  Guiding migrating salmonid smolts: Experimentally assessing the performance of angled and inclined screens with varying gap widths , 2022, Ecological Engineering.

[7]  P. Kemp,et al.  Evaluation of horizontally and vertically aligned bar racks for guiding downstream moving juvenile chub (Squalius cephalus) and barbel (Barbus barbus) , 2021 .

[8]  J. Walde,et al.  Ethohydraulic experiments on the fish protection potential of the hybrid system FishProtector at hydropower plants , 2021 .

[9]  H. Capra,et al.  Coupling 3D hydraulic simulation and fish telemetry data to characterize the behaviour of migrating smolts approaching a bypass , 2021, Journal of Ecohydraulics.

[10]  Bernhard Zeiringer,et al.  Fischschutz und Anströmung an Wasserkraftanlagen mit niedrigen Fallhöhen , 2021, WASSERWIRTSCHAFT.

[11]  G. Aggidis,et al.  Assessing the energy potential of modernizing the European hydropower fleet , 2021, Energy Conversion and Management.

[12]  D. Zhu,et al.  Evaluating Dam Water Release Strategies for Migrating Adult Salmon Using Computational Fluid Dynamic Modeling and Biotelemetry , 2021, Water Resources Research.

[13]  D. Vericat,et al.  A review of the impacts of dams on the hydromorphology of tropical rivers. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  J. Geist.  Editorial: Green or red: Challenges for fish and freshwater biodiversity conservation related to hydropower , 2021, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.

[15]  K. Alfredsen,et al.  Validation of a Swimming Direction Model for the Downstream Migration of Atlantic Salmon Smolts , 2021, Water.

[16]  R. Weichert,et al.  A Parametric Approach for Determining Fishway Attraction Flow at Hydropower Dams , 2021, Water.

[17]  C. Berger.  Verluste und Auslegung von Schräg-rechen anhand ethohydraulischer Studien , 2020, WASSERWIRTSCHAFT.

[18]  E. García‐Berthou,et al.  Key factors explaining critical swimming speed in freshwater fish: a review and statistical analysis for Iberian species , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[19]  S. Pande,et al.  Anthropogenic Modifications and River Ecosystem Services: A Landscape Perspective , 2020, Water.

[20]  C. Katopodis,et al.  Behaviour and ability of a cyprinid (Schizopygopsis younghusbandi) to cope with accelerating flows when migrating downstream , 2020, River Research and Applications.

[21]  J. Rabuñal,et al.  Pool-Type Fishway Design for a Potamodromous Cyprinid in the Iberian Peninsula: The Iberian Barbel—Synthesis and Future Directions , 2020 .

[22]  T. Forseth,et al.  The effects of hydrodynamics on the three-dimensional downstream migratory movement of Atlantic salmon. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  Helge Fuchs,et al.  Head Losses of Horizontal Bar Racks as Fish Guidance Structures , 2020, Water.

[24]  Helge Fuchs,et al.  Velocity Fields at Horizontal Bar Racks as Fish Guidance Structures , 2020, Water.

[25]  A. Zeileis,et al.  Downstream passage behavior of potamodromous fishes at the fish protection and guidance system “Flexible Fish Fence” , 2020 .

[26]  A. Peter,et al.  Fish guidance structures: hydraulic performance and fish guidance efficiencies , 2020 .

[27]  K. Alfredsen,et al.  Modelling mitigation measures for smolt migration at dammed river sections , 2019, Ecohydrology.

[28]  R. Gabl,et al.  Experimental Hydraulic Investigation of Angled Fish Protection Systems—Comparison of Circular Bars and Cables , 2019, Water.

[29]  Carl Robert Kriewitz,et al.  Conceptual Approach for Positioning of Fish Guidance Structures Using CFD and Expert Knowledge , 2019, Sustainability.

[30]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Fish passage hydrodynamics: insights into overcoming migration challenges for small-bodied fish , 2019, Journal of Ecohydraulics.

[31]  D. Nyqvist,et al.  An angled rack with a bypass and a nature-like fishway pass Atlantic salmon smolts downstream at a hydropower dam , 2018 .

[32]  Jasper de Bie,et al.  Effectiveness of horizontally and vertically oriented wedge-wire screens to guide downstream moving juvenile chub (Squalius cephalus) , 2018, Ecological Engineering.

[33]  T. Forseth,et al.  Common mechanisms for guidance efficiency of descending Atlantic salmon smolts in small and large hydroelectric power plants , 2018, Rivers Research and Applications: an international journal devoted to river research and management.

[34]  A. Mäki‐Petäys,et al.  Survival and migration speed of radio-tagged Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts in two large rivers: one without and one with dams , 2018, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.

[35]  Christy Ushanth Navaratnam,et al.  Experimental hydraulics on fish-friendly trash-racks: an ecological approach , 2018 .

[36]  Nallamuthu Rajaratnam,et al.  The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice , 2018 .

[37]  D. Ahlfeld,et al.  Sensitivity of the downward to sweeping velocity ratio to the bypass flow percentage along a guide wall for downstream fish passage , 2017 .

[38]  Roberto Revelli,et al.  Turbulent flow field comparison and related suitability for fish passage of a standard and a simplified low‐gradient vertical slot fishway , 2017 .

[39]  Wernher Brevis,et al.  The fish Strouhal number as a criterion for hydraulic fishway design , 2017 .

[40]  John M. Nestler,et al.  Optimizing attraction flow for upstream fish passage at a hydropower dam employing 3D Detached-Eddy Simulation , 2017 .

[41]  David P. Ahlfeld,et al.  A computational fluid dynamics modeling study of guide walls for downstream fish passage , 2017 .

[42]  M. Ovidio,et al.  Poor Performance of a Retrofitted Downstream Bypass Revealed by the Analysis of Approaching Behaviour in Combination with a Trapping System , 2017 .

[43]  J. Santos,et al.  Downstream Swimming Behaviour of Catadromous and Potamodromous Fish Over Spillways , 2016 .

[44]  Falk Wagner.  Vergleichende Analyse des Fischabstiegs an drei Wasserkraftanlagen einer Kraftwerkskette , 2016, Wasserwirtschaft.

[45]  Marcela Politano,et al.  Analysis of movements and behavior of smolts swimming in hydropower reservoirs , 2015 .

[46]  T. Lundström,et al.  Evaluation of Guiding Device for Downstream Fish Migration with in-Field Particle Tracking Velocimetry and CFD , 2015 .

[47]  P. Warren,et al.  The impacts of ‘run‐of‐river’ hydropower on the physical and ecological condition of rivers , 2015 .

[48]  James J. Anderson,et al.  Fish navigation of large dams emerges from their modulation of flow field experience , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Christos Katopodis,et al.  The development of fish passage research in a historical context , 2012 .

[50]  Paul S. Kemp,et al.  Effects of light on the behaviour of brown trout (Salmo trutta) encountering accelerating flow: Application to downstream fish passage , 2012 .

[51]  F. Travade,et al.  THINKING LIKE A FISH: A KEY INGREDIENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF EFFECTIVE FISH PASSAGE FACILITIES AT RIVER OBSTRUCTIONS , 2012 .

[52]  James J. Anderson,et al.  Effects of Decelerating and Accelerating Flows on Juvenile Salmonid Behavior , 2012 .

[53]  M. T. Ferreira,et al.  Effects of water velocity and turbulence on the behaviour of Iberian barbel (Luciobarbus bocagei, Steindachner 1864) in an experimental pool‐type fishway , 2011 .

[54]  H. Tritico,et al.  The effects of turbulent eddies on the stability and critical swimming speed of creek chub (Semotilus atromaculatus) , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[55]  I. J. Russon,et al.  Response of downstream migrating adult European eels (Anguilla anguilla) to bar racks under experimental conditions , 2010 .

[56]  L. Greenberg,et al.  Connectivity is a two‐way street—the need for a holistic approach to fish passage problems in regulated rivers , 2009 .

[57]  Michael H. Gessel,et al.  Development of successful fish passage structures for downstream migrants requires knowledge of their behavioural response to accelerating flow. , 2009 .

[58]  T. Staffan Lundström,et al.  Flow design of guiding device for downstream fish migration , 2009 .

[59]  John G. Williams.  Mitigating the effects of high-head dams on the Columbia River, USA: experience from the trenches , 2008, Hydrobiologia.

[60]  J. Liao,et al.  A review of fish swimming mechanics and behaviour in altered flows , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  H. Dingle,et al.  What Is Migration? , 2007 .

[62]  F. Travade,et al.  Tests of two types of bypass for downstream migration of eels at a small hydroelectric power plant , 2005 .

[63]  C. Revenga,et al.  Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of the World's Large River Systems , 2005, Science.

[64]  A. Ploner,et al.  Fish drift in a Danube sidearm-system: I. Site-, inter- and intraspecific patterns , 2004 .

[65]  A. Roy,et al.  The effect of turbulence on the cost of swimming for juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) , 2003 .

[66]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[67]  Martyn C. Lucas,et al.  Migration of Freshwater Fishes , 2001 .

[68]  C. Gerstner,et al.  Use of substratum ripples for flow refuging by Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua , 1998, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[69]  B. Adam,et al.  Fish Protection Technologies and Fish Ways for Downstream Migration , 2020 .

[70]  Maarja Kruusmaa,et al.  3D modelling of non-uniform and turbulent flow in vertical slot fishways , 2018, Environ. Model. Softw..

[71]  J. Best,et al.  Anthropogenic stresses on the world’s big rivers , 2018, Nature Geoscience.

[72]  U. Ghia,et al.  Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications , 2007 .

[73]  M. Larinier,et al.  Downstream migration: problems and facilities , 2002 .

[74]  Theodore Castro-Santos,et al.  Effect of Water Acceleration on Downstream Migratory Behavior and Passage of Atlantic Salmon Smolts and Juvenile American Shad at Surface Bypasses , 1998 .

[75]  C. W. Hirt,et al.  Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries , 1981 .