Environmental Pressure on Software as a Service Adoption: An Integrated Perspective

In this study, we employed institutional theory as a main framework and integrated it with concepts from diffusion of innovation and technology-organization-environment to examine a firm’s intention to adopt software as a service. We operationalized our assessment of a firm’s environmental pressures as mimetic, coercive and normative pressures and examined the moderating role of perceived technology complexity. We empirically tested our research model using data from 289 valid survey responses. The results provide support for the assertion that there are both significant direct and interaction effects that influence a firm’s software as a service adoption intention. Most important was the significant interaction effects between mimetic pressure and perceived technology complexity. This suggests that the complex relationships proposed by institutional theory and diffusion of innovation help to describe how environmental pressures and perceived technology complexity combine to affect intention to adopt.

[1]  G. Carroll,et al.  Errata: Organizational Mortality in the Newspaper Industries of Argentina and Ireland: An Ecological Approach , 1982 .

[2]  T. S. Raghu,et al.  Exploring the grand challenges for next generation e-Business: selected papers from the workshop on e-Business 2009 , 2012, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[3]  Wei-Wen Wu,et al.  Mining significant factors affecting the adoption of SaaS using the rough set approach , 2011, J. Syst. Softw..

[4]  M. Fleischer,et al.  processes of technological innovation , 1990 .

[5]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Drivers of SaaS-Adoption – An Empirical Study of Different Application Types , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[6]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[7]  George Feuerlicht,et al.  Next Generation SOA: Can SOA Survive Cloud Computing? , 2010 .

[8]  Anand Jeyaraj,et al.  A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Elena Mugellini,et al.  Advances in Intelligent Web Mastering - 2 , 2007 .

[10]  Pamela S. Tolbert Institutional Environments and Resource Dependence: Sources of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education. , 1985 .

[11]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[12]  K. Wei,et al.  The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm's intention to adopt internet‐enabled supply chain management systems , 2010 .

[13]  Marguerite Schneider,et al.  Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers , 2006 .

[14]  Casey G. Cegielski Who values technology certification? , 2004, CACM.

[15]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  Determinants of EDI adoption in the transportation industry , 1997 .

[16]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  T. S. Raghu,et al.  Exploring the Grand Challenges for Next Generation E-Business - 8th Workshop on E-Business, WEB 2009, Phoenix, AZ, USA, December 15, 2009, Revised Selected Papers , 2011, WEB.

[18]  Frank Gens,et al.  Cloud Computing Benefits, risks and recommendations for information security , 2010 .

[19]  Massimo Magni,et al.  Environmental and organizational drivers influencing the adoption of VoIP , 2009, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[20]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .

[21]  Marianne Bradford,et al.  Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems , 2003, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  SME adoption of IT: the case of electronic trading systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[23]  Minder Chen,et al.  Empowering collaborative commerce with Web services enabled business process management systems , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[25]  S. Rogelberg,et al.  Introduction Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse , 2007 .

[26]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL AND COMPETITIVE BANDWAGONS: USING MATHEMATICAL MODELING AS A TOOL TO EXPLORE INNOVATION DIFFUSION , 1993 .

[27]  Fang Wu,et al.  Determinants of e-communication adoption: The internal push versus external pull factors , 2005 .

[28]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Daniele Catteddu and Giles Hogben Cloud Computing. Benefits, risks and recommendations for information security , 2009 .

[30]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..