Human optokinetic nystagmus: Competition between stationary and moving displays

We reported earlier that occlusion of the central retina and stationary edges have highly interactive effects on the gain of optokinetic nystagmus (OKN; Murasugi, Howard, & Ohmi, 1986). In this study, we explored this effect in more detail. A central occluding band of variable height, flanked by vertical bars, was superimposed onto an array of dots moving at 30° per second. The height of the occluding band required to abolish OKN increased with the separation of the vertical bars. For bars 3.5° apart, OKN was abolished in most subjects when a band only 6’ high ran between them. For bars 75° apart, a band at least 20° in height was required to abolish the response. The effects of the stationary figure depended to some extent on the subject’s attention, but only at intermediate values of bar separation. Both low- and high-level mechaisms are proposed to account for the results.

[1]  K. Koffka.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[2]  Han Collewijn,et al.  Control of human optokinetic nystagmus by the central and peripheral retina: Effects of partial visual field masking, scotopic vision and central retinal scotomata , 1986, Brain Research.

[3]  G. Johansson.  Studies on Visual Perception of Locomotion , 1977, Perception.

[4]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[5]  C. Schor,et al.  Asymmetries of optokinetic nystagmus in amblyopia: The effect of selected retinal stimulation , 1985, Vision Research.

[6]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Human smooth and saccadic eye movements during voluntary pursuit of different target motions on different backgrounds. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  H Collewijn,et al.  Human fixation and pursuit in normal and open‐loop conditions: effects of central and peripheral retinal targets. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  H. J. Wyatt,et al.  A mechanism for suppression of optokinesis , 1984, Vision Research.

[9]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Voluntary selection of the target for smooth eye movement in the presence of superimposed, full-field stationary and moving stimuli , 1984, Vision Research.

[10]  Masao Ohmi,et al.  Optokinetic nystagmus: The effects of stationary edges, alone and in combination with central occlusion , 1986, Vision Research.

[11]  R D Yee,et al.  Effects of an optokinetic background on pursuit eye movements. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human optokinetic nystagmus in response to moving binocularly disparate stimuli , 1987, Vision Research.

[13]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Optokinetic reactions in man elicited by localized retinal motion stimuli , 1979, Vision Research.

[14]  Masao Ohmi,et al.  The efficiency of the central and peripheral retina in driving human optokinetic nystagmus , 1984, Vision Research.

[15]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Optokinetic nystagmus in man: Role of the central and peripheral retina and occurrence of asymmetries , 1983, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  H. Collewijn.  Direction-selective units in the rabbit's nucleus of the optic tract , 1975, Brain Research.

[17]  I P Howard,et al.  Human Horizontal Optokinetic Nystagmus Elicited by the Upper Versus the Lower Visual Fields , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[18]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Biological image motion processing: A review , 1985, Vision Research.

[19]  W. Precht,et al.  Functional organization of the mechanisms subserving the optokinetic nystagmus in the cat , 1981, Neuroscience.