Many roads lead to recognition: Electrophysiological correlates of familiarity derived from short-term masked repetition priming

The neural mechanisms that underlie familiarity memory have been extensively investigated, but a consensus understanding remains elusive. Behavioral evidence suggests that familiarity sometimes shares sources with instances of implicit memory known as priming, in that the same increases in processing fluency that give rise to priming can engender familiarity. One underappreciated implication of this account is that patterns of neural activity that appear to index familiarity in a generic sense may instead reflect fluency-related precursors of recognition. In a novel illustration of this principle, we examined brain potentials during recognition tests for visual words. In two experiments, fluency was selectively enhanced for half of the test cues via masked repetition priming. Replicating previous findings, the proportion of words endorsed as "old" was greater for words immediately preceded by a matching masked word versus an unrelated one. In addition, N400 potentials were more positive for test cues preceded by matching versus unrelated masked words. Similar N400 differences were observed when false alarms were compared to correct rejections for the subset of unstudied words that were preceded by matching masked words. These N400 effects were topographically dissociable from other potentials that correlated with familiarity for studied words. We conclude that experiences of familiarity can have different neural correlates that signal the operation of distinct neurocognitive precursors of recognition judgments. Conceptualizations of the neural basis of recognition memory must account for a plurality of mechanisms that produce familiarity memory.

[1]  Orthography, phonology, and meaning: Word features that give rise to feelings of familiarity in recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  John P. Aggleton,et al.  Interleaving brain systems for episodic and recognition memory , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Bridging the gap between the semantic N400 and the early old/new memory effect , 2007, Neuroreport.

[4]  N. Roberts,et al.  Theories of episodic memory. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[5]  L. Squire,et al.  Recognition memory and familiarity judgments in severe amnesia: no evidence for a contribution of repetition priming. , 2000, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  J. Grainger,et al.  Exploring the temporal dynamics of visual word recognition in the masked repetition priming paradigm using event-related potentials , 2007, Brain Research.

[7]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Richard N Henson,et al.  Predictive, interactive multiple memory systems , 2010, Hippocampus.

[9]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer The secret life of fluency , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Remembering and knowing: Electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval , 2009, NeuroImage.

[11]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  D. Westerman Relative fluency and illusions of recognition memory , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  On the Time Course of Visual Word Recognition: An Event-related Potential Investigation using Masked Repetition Priming , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Ken A Paller,et al.  Neural correlates of conceptual implicit memory and their contamination of putative neural correlates of explicit memory. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[15]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Imaginal, Semantic, and Surface-Level Processing of Concrete and Abstract Words: An Electrophysiological Investigation , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Henson Neuroimaging studies of priming , 2003, Progress in Neurobiology.

[17]  R. Knight,et al.  The Medial Temporal Lobe Supports Conceptual Implicit Memory , 2010, Neuron.

[18]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[19]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Validating neural correlates of familiarity , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  The impact of fluency on explicit memory tasks in amnesia , 2012, Cognitive neuroscience.

[21]  P. Gooding,et al.  A New Theoretical Framework For Explicit and Implicit Memory , 1997 .

[22]  J. Kounios,et al.  Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiological investigation. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Mieke Verfaellie,et al.  Recognition memory in amnesia: Effects of relaxing response criteria , 2001, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[24]  Jason R. Taylor,et al.  Could masked conceptual primes increase recollection? The subtleties of measuring recollection and familiarity in recognition memory , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[26]  Ken A Paller,et al.  The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: when a face seems familiar but is not remembered , 2004, NeuroImage.

[27]  J. Grainger,et al.  The effects of prime visibility on ERP measures of masked priming. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Illusions of immediate memory: evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality , 1990 .

[29]  J. Ward,et al.  Data-driven recognition memory: A new technique and some data on age differences , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  E. Salmon,et al.  Patients with Alzheimer's disease use metamemory to attenuate the Jacoby–Whitehouse illusion , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  T. Curran,et al.  Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Accurate forced-choice recognition without awareness of memory retrieval. , 2008, Learning & memory.

[33]  Johan Hellman,et al.  Familiarity or Conceptual Priming: Event-related Potentials in Name Recognition , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  A. Yonelinas Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  R. Tunney,et al.  Behavioral and Brain Functions , 2007 .

[36]  L. Cermak,et al.  Perceptual fluency as a cue for recognition judgments in amnesia. , 1999, Neuropsychology.

[37]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honour of Endel Tulving , 2014 .

[38]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Establishing a relationship between activity reduction in human perirhinal cortex and priming , 2009, Hippocampus.

[39]  Ken A Paller,et al.  What makes recognition without awareness appear to be elusive? Strategic factors that influence the accuracy of guesses. , 2010, Learning & memory.

[40]  L. Squire,et al.  Relaxing decision criteria does not improve recognition memory in amnesic patients , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[41]  K. Norman How hippocampus and cortex contribute to recognition memory: Revisiting the complementary learning systems model , 2010, Hippocampus.

[42]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[43]  L. Squire,et al.  Intact Conceptual Priming in the Absence of Declarative Memory , 2004, Psychological science.

[44]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  Jeremy K. Miller,et al.  The attribution of perceptual fluency in recognition memory: the role of expectation , 2002 .

[46]  Rosemary A. Cowell,et al.  Components of recognition memory: Dissociable cognitive processes or just differences in representational complexity? , 2010, Hippocampus.

[47]  S. Rajaram,et al.  Conceptual fluency selectively influences knowing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  P. Holcomb,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[49]  Glen E. Bodner,et al.  Re-examining dissociations between remembering and knowing: Binary judgments vs. independent ratings , 2011 .

[50]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Finding meaning in novel geometric shapes influences electrophysiological correlates of repetition and dissociates perceptual and conceptual priming , 2010, NeuroImage.

[51]  Brian P. Kurilla,et al.  Processing fluency affects subjective claims of recollection , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[52]  J. Kounios,et al.  Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[53]  Karine Lebreton,et al.  Is Neocortical–Hippocampal Connectivity a Better Predictor of Subsequent Recollection than Local Increases in Hippocampal Activity? New Insights on the Role of Priming , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  J. Wixted Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[55]  Scott D Slotnick,et al.  “Remember” source memory ROCs indicate recollection is a continuous process , 2010, Memory.

[56]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  To watch, to see, and to differ: An event-related potential study of concreteness effects as a function of word class and lexical ambiguity , 2008, Brain and Language.

[57]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[58]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Conceptual Priming and Familiarity: Different Expressions of Memory during Recognition Testing with Distinct Neurophysiological Correlates , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[60]  Suparna Rajaram,et al.  Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[61]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Fluent Conceptual Processing and Explicit Memory for Faces Are Electrophysiologically Distinct , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[62]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory , 1998, Nature.

[63]  L R Squire,et al.  Intact perceptual memory in the absence of conscious memory. , 1997, Behavioral neuroscience.

[64]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  An Electrophysiological Signature of Unconscious Recognition Memory , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[65]  Jared F. Danker,et al.  Characterizing the ERP Old-New effect in a short-term memory task. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[66]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[67]  D. Schacter,et al.  Reductions in cortical activity during priming , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[68]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  FN400 potentials are functionally identical to N400 potentials and reflect semantic processing during recognition testing. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[69]  John T Wixted,et al.  Measuring recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe , 2010, Hippocampus.

[70]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[71]  J D Gabrieli,et al.  Dissociations between familiarity processes in explicit recognition and implicit perceptual memory. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[72]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[73]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity strength and item repetition , 2010, Brain Research.

[74]  K. Forster,et al.  Event-related brain potential examination of implicit memory processes: masked and unmasked repetition priming. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[75]  Richard N. A. Henson,et al.  Event-related Potentials Associated with Masked Priming of Test Cues Reveal Multiple Potential Contributions to Recognition Memory , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[76]  Jeremy K. Miller,et al.  When does modality matter? Perceptual versus conceptual fluency-based illusions in recognition memory , 2008 .

[77]  Hiroki R. Hayama,et al.  Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity , 2006, Brain Research.

[78]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[79]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .

[80]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[81]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  An illusion of memory: false recognition influenced by unconscious perception , 1989 .

[82]  Jeremy K. Miller,et al.  Change in perceptual form attenuates the use of the fluency heuristic in recognition , 2003, Memory & cognition.