An Analysis of the Most Adopted Rating Systems for Assessing the Environmental Impact of Buildings

Rating systems for assessing the environmental impact of buildings are technical instruments that aim to evaluate the environmental impact of buildings and construction projects. In some cases, these rating systems can also cover urban-scale projects, community projects, and infrastructures. These schemes are designed to assist project management in making the projects more sustainable by providing frameworks with precise criteria for assessing the various aspects of a building’s environmental impact. Given the growing interest in sustainable development worldwide, many rating systems for assessing the environmental impact of buildings have been established in recent years, each one with its peculiarities and fields of applicability. The present work is motivated by an interest in emphasizing such differences to better understand these rating systems and extract the main implications to building design. It also attempts to summarize in a user-friendly form the vast and fragmented assortment of information that is available today. The analysis focuses on the six main rating systems: the Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology (BREEAM), the Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency (CASBEE), the Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Nachhaltiges Bauen (DGNB), the Haute Qualite Environnementale (HQETM), the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), and the Sustainable Building Tool (SBTool).

[1]  D. Crawley,et al.  Comparative assessment of environmental performance tools and the role of the Green Building Challenge , 2001 .

[2]  Rebecca Retzlaff,et al.  Green Buildings and Building Assessment Systems , 2009 .

[3]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment of the average passenger vehicle in the Netherlands , 2003 .

[4]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS , 2011 .

[5]  Ayşin Sev.  A comparative analysis of building environmental assessment tools and suggestions for regional adaptations , 2011 .

[6]  S. Al-Athel,et al.  Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: "Our Common Future" , 1987 .

[7]  Ricardo Mateus,et al.  Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: Developing the methodology SBTool PTH , 2011 .

[8]  J C HENRY,et al.  New construction. , 1962, Hospital progress.

[9]  N. Larsson.  iiSBE: the International Initiative for Sustainable Built Environment , 2001 .

[10]  Anna Forsberg,et al.  Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment , 2004 .

[11]  Steve Hubbard,et al.  CRADLE-TO-GATE LIFE-CYCLE INVENTORY OF US WOOD PRODUCTS PRODUCTION: CORRIM PHASE I AND PHASE II PRODUCTS , 2010 .

[12]  Jae S. Choi,et al.  Sustainable Development: Lessons from the Paradox of Enrichment , 2001 .

[13]  G Gaby Abdalla,et al.  Criticism on Environmental Assessment Tools , 2011 .

[14]  Roland Clift,et al.  Comparison of currently available european LCA software , 1997 .

[15]  Hugh Byrd,et al.  Green buildings: issues for New Zealand , 2011 .

[16]  Stéphane Citherlet,et al.  Eco-Bat: A design tool for assessing environmental impacts of buildings and equipment , 2008 .

[17]  Nils Larsson,et al.  Green Building Challenge: the development of an idea , 2001 .

[18]  Robin Honeyman.  Transformations in the Water Consumption of Office Buildings: Water Demand Management Approaches in Sydney’s Office Buildings under the National Australian Built Environment Rating System , 2015 .

[19]  U. Berardi.  Sustainability Assessment in the Construction Sector: Rating Systems and Rated Buildings , 2012 .

[20]  Michael G. Lipsett,et al.  A Review of Sustainability Assessment and Sustainability/Environmental Rating Systems and Credit Weighting Tools , 2011 .

[21]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Exergy, power and work in the US economy, 1900–1998 , 2003 .

[22]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  R. Goodland.  The Concept of Environmental Sustainability , 1995 .

[24]  Malawi,et al.  PAGE , 2019, Springer Reference Medizin.

[25]  Umberto Berardi.  Beyond Sustainability Assessment Systems: Upgrading Topics by Enlarging The Scale of Assessment , 2011 .

[26]  C. Wheatley,et al.  COMPARISON OF ENERGY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN LEED , BREEAM AND GREEN STAR , 2009 .

[27]  Drury B. Crawley,et al.  Building environmental assessment methods: applications and development trends , 1999 .

[28]  Appu Haapio,et al.  A critical review of building environmental assessment tools , 2008 .

[29]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[30]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[31]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Cowboys, cornucopians and long-run sustainability , 1993 .

[32]  Rolf Clayton,et al.  Is Sustainable Development an Oxymoron , 2001 .

[33]  L. Codispoti.  The limits to growth , 1997, Nature.

[34]  N. Abe,et al.  Stakeholders' perspectives of a building environmental assessment method: The case of CASBEE , 2014 .

[35]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA , 2009 .

[36]  G. O’Brien,et al.  Sustainable development: mapping different approaches , 2005 .

[37]  Jeremy T Gibberd.  Sustainable building assessment tool: integrating sustainability into current design and building processes , 2008 .

[38]  Grace K C Ding,et al.  Sustainable construction--the role of environmental assessment tools. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[39]  Qiang Hu,et al.  The Comparative Study on the Sustainable Sites Indicators between ESGB and LEED , 2012 .