Inter-organizational information systems adoption – a configuration analysis approach

In this article we propose a new complementary approach to investigate Inter-Organizational Information Systems (IOIS) adoption called configuration analysis. We motivate the need for a new approach by the common observation that the structure and the strategy of an IOIS are interdependent and that the IOIS adoptions consequently cluster orderly. For example, an IOIS setup with a powerful customer as a hub and many suppliers as spokes frequently surfaces across diffusion studies. Yet, this fact has not been integrated into existing analyses, and its implications have not been fully developed. We propose that IOIS scholars need to look beyond the single adopting organization in IOIS adoption studies and in contrast consider adoption units what we call an adoption configuration. Each such configuration can be further characterized along the following dimensions: (1) vision, (2) key functionality, (3) mode of interaction, (4) structure and (5) mode of appropriation. In addition, these dimensions do not co-vary independently. For example, a particular organizing vision assumes a specific inter-organizational structure. A typology of IOIS configurations for adoption analysis is laid out consisting of dyadic, hub and spoke, industry and community configurations. Specific forms or adoption analysis are suggested for each type of configuration. Overall, configuration analysis redirects IOIS adoption studies both at the theoretical and the methodological level, and a corresponding research agenda is sketched.

[1]  David J. Miller,et al.  Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis , 1986 .

[2]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Contours of diffusion of electronic data interchange in Finland: Overcoming technological barriers and collaborating to make it happen , 1998, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Hong Kong's EDI bandwagon derailed or on the right track? , 1997 .

[4]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[5]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems , 1996, MIS Q..

[6]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Building Electronic Trading Infrastructures: A Public or Private Responsibility? , 2001, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[7]  C. Oliver.  Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[8]  Lyne Bouchard,et al.  Decision Criteria in the Adoption of EDI , 1993, ICIS.

[9]  C. Perrow.  Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[10]  Robert B. Johnston,et al.  The Use of an Explicitly Theory-Driven Data Coding Method for High-Level Theory Testing in IOIS , 2008, ICIS.

[11]  Jörg Meier,et al.  Empirical Survey of EDI Applied in Practice , 1995, Electron. Mark..

[12]  B. Pentland.  Building Process Theory with Narrative: from Description to Explanation , 1999 .

[13]  James L. McKenney,et al.  Developing an Historical Tradition in MIS Research , 1997, MIS Q..

[14]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  To join or not to join: a framework for evaluating electronic data interchange systems , 1994, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Sherah Kurnia,et al.  The need for a processual view of inter-organizational systems adoption , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[16]  James L. McKenney,et al.  Airline Reservations Systems: Lessons from History , 1988, MIS Q..

[17]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[18]  Mari Sako,et al.  SUPPLIERS' ASSOCIATIONS IN THE JAPANESE AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY: COLLECTIVE ACTION FOR TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION , 1996 .

[19]  Richard Vidgen,et al.  Automotive e-hubs: Exploring motivations and barriers to collaboration and interaction , 2006, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Amany R. Elbanna,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2001 .

[21]  Juliet Webster,et al.  Networks of collaboration or conflict? Electronic data interchange and power in the supply chain , 1995, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[22]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[23]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Industry-Wide Information Systems Standardization as Collective Action: The Case of the U.S. Residential Mortgage Industry , 2006, MIS Q..

[24]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[25]  Tor J. Larsen,et al.  The Phenomenon of Diffusion , 2001, Diffusing Software Products and Process Innovations.

[26]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[27]  Ajit Kambil,et al.  Electronic Integration and Business Network Redesign: a Roles-Linkage Perspective , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Evangelos Katsamakas,et al.  Design and Ownership of Two-Sided Networks: Implications for Internet Platforms , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  A research manifesto for services science , 2006, CACM.

[30]  S. Ghoneim,et al.  Drivers and barriers to adopting EDI: a sector analysis of UK industry , 1996 .

[31]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[32]  Roger A. Clarke,et al.  Electronic data interchange in international trade: frameworks for the strategic analysis of ocean port communities , 1994, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  The Procrustean Bed of Standards: Binary Relations and the Limits of EDI Standards , 2000 .

[34]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[35]  Robert B. Johnston,et al.  A Theorizing Evolution of Inter-organizational Information Systems on Long Timescales , 2008 .

[36]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  The Procrustean Bed of Standards , 2000 .

[37]  Gyoo Gun Lim,et al.  The impact of partnership attributes on EDI implementation success , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[38]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  R. Emerson.  Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[40]  R. Coase.  The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[41]  David R. Mackay,et al.  The impact of EDI on the components sector of the Australian automotive industry , 1993, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Jong-min Choe,et al.  Inter-organizational relationships and the flow of information through value chains , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[43]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[44]  A. Pouloudi,et al.  Stakeholder identification in inter-organizational systems: gaining insights for drug use management systems , 1997 .

[45]  Hagen K. C. Pfeiffer,et al.  The Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange , 1992 .

[46]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Yolanda Polo-Redondo,et al.  Key variables in the EDI adoption by retail firms , 2001 .

[48]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  Building Electronic Trading Infrastructure: a Private or Public Responsibility , 2000 .

[49]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  The Role of Interorganizational and Organizational Factors on the Decision Mode for Adoption of Interorganizational Systems , 1995 .

[50]  Raghu Garud,et al.  The innovation journey , 1999 .

[51]  Niels Ole Finnemann,et al.  Downward Causation: Minds, Bodies and Matter , 2001 .

[52]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  What's Wrong with the Diffusion of Innovation Theory , 2001, Diffusing Software Products and Process Innovations.

[53]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Role of Intermediating Institutions in the Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI): How Industry Associations Intervened in Denmark, Finland, and Hong Kong , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[54]  Kenzo Fujisue,et al.  A comparative analysis of EDI integration in US and Japanese automobile suppliers , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[55]  W. Orlikowski.  Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[56]  Claire Lobet-Maris,et al.  EDI adoption and standard choice: A conceptual model , 1995, ECIS.

[57]  Neil C. Ramiller,et al.  The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation , 1997 .

[58]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[59]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[60]  Albert Boonstra,et al.  Managing stakeholders around inter-organizational systems: A diagnostic approach , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[61]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[62]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Developing Theory Through Simulation Methods , 2006 .

[63]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[64]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[65]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[66]  Paul J. Hart,et al.  Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange , 1997 .

[67]  Sherah Kurnia,et al.  A Dyadic Model of Interorganizational Systems (IOS) Adoption Maturity , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[68]  Michael R. Vitale,et al.  Creating Competitive Advantage with Interorganizational Information Systems , 1988, MIS Q..

[69]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[70]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[71]  O. Williamson.  Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[72]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[73]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[74]  Akos Nagy.  Collaboration and Conflict in the Electronic Integration of Supply Networks , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[75]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  Binary trading relations and the limits of EDI standards: the Procrustean bed of standards , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[76]  M. Christopher.  Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Cost and Improving Service (Second Edition) , 1999 .