Identification and Characterization of the Functional Elements within the Tobacco Etch Virus 5′ Leader Required for Cap-Independent Translation

ABSTRACT Translation in plants is highly cap dependent, and the only plant mRNAs known to naturally lack a cap structure (m7GpppN) are viral in origin. The genomic RNA of tobacco etch virus (TEV), a potyvirus that belongs to the picornavirus superfamily, is a polyadenylated mRNA that is naturally uncapped and yet is a highly competitive mRNA during translation. The 143-nucleotide 5′ leader is responsible for conferring cap-independent translation even on reporter mRNAs. We have carried out a deletion analysis of the TEV 5′ leader to identify the elements responsible for its regulatory function and have identified two centrally located cap-independent regulatory elements (CIREs) that promote cap-independent translation. The introduction of a stable stem-loop structure upstream of each element demonstrated that CIRE-1 is less 5′ end dependent in function than CIRE-2. In a dicistronic mRNA, the presence of the TEV 5′ leader sequence in the intercistronic region increased expression of the second cistron, suggesting that the viral sequence can function in a 5′-distal position. Interestingly, the introduction of a stable stem-loop upstream of the TEV leader sequence or upstream of either CIRE in dicistronic constructs markedly increased their regulatory function. These data suggest that the TEV 5′ leader contains two elements that together promote internal initiation but that the function of one element, in particular, is facilitated by proximity to the 5′ end.

[1]  E. Wimmer,et al.  The 5' end of poliovirus mRNA is not capped with m7G(5')ppp(5')Np. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  D. Baltimore,et al.  5'-terminal structure of poliovirus polyribosomal RNA is pUp. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  D. Baltimore,et al.  5′-Terminal nucleotide sequences of polio virus polyribosomal RNA and virion RNA are identical , 1977, Nature.

[4]  E. Wimmer,et al.  The 5'-terminal structures of poliovirion RNA and poliovirus mRNA differ only in the genome-linked protein VPg. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Michael Zuker,et al.  Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information , 1981, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  O. Miller,et al.  Electron microscopic visualization of a discrete class of giant translation units in salivary gland cells of Chironomus tentans , 1982, The EMBO journal.

[7]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Insertion mutagenesis to increase secondary structure within the 5′ noncoding region of a eukaryotic mRNA reduces translational efficiency , 1985, Cell.

[8]  M. Kozak.  Influences of mRNA secondary structure on initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  M. Kozak,et al.  Effects of intercistronic length on the efficiency of reinitiation by eucaryotic ribosomes. , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[10]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Internal initiation of translation of eukaryotic mRNA directed by a sequence derived from poliovirus RNA , 1988, Nature.

[11]  E. Wimmer,et al.  A segment of the 5' nontranslated region of encephalomyocarditis virus RNA directs internal entry of ribosomes during in vitro translation , 1988, Journal of virology.

[12]  J. Carrington,et al.  Expression and Function of Potyviral Gene Products , 1988 .

[13]  E. Kiseleva.  Secretory protein synthesis in Chironomus salivary gland cells is not coupled with protein translocation across endoplasmic reticulum membranes , 1989, FEBS letters.

[14]  D. Melton,et al.  Synthesis of long, capped transcripts in vitro by SP6 and T7 RNA polymerases. , 1989, Methods in enzymology.

[15]  J. Carrington,et al.  Cap-independent enhancement of translation by a plant potyvirus 5' nontranslated region , 1990, Journal of virology.

[16]  F. Salamini,et al.  Characterization of a potato leafroll luteovirus subgenomic RNA: differential expression by internal translation initiation and UAG suppression. , 1990, The Journal of general virology.

[17]  E. ter Haar,et al.  Cowpea mosaic virus middle component RNA contains a sequence that allows internal binding of ribosomes and that requires eukaryotic initiation factor 4F for optimal translation , 1991, Journal of virology.

[18]  G. Lomonossoff,et al.  The mechanism of translation of cowpea mosaic virus middle component RNA: no evidence for internal initiation from experiments in an animal cell transient expression system. , 1991, The Journal of general virology.

[19]  D. Gallie.  The cap and poly(A) tail function synergistically to regulate mRNA translational efficiency. , 1991, Genes & development.

[20]  D. Gallie,et al.  RNA delivery in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using electroporation , 1992, Yeast.

[21]  V. Walbot,et al.  Identification of the motifs within the tobacco mosaic virus 5'-leader responsible for enhancing translation. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  P. Dallaire,et al.  Evidence for an internal ribosome entry site within the 5' non-translated region of turnip mosaic potyvirus RNA. , 1994, The Journal of general virology.

[23]  R. Rhoads,et al.  Mapping of Functional Domains in Eukaryotic Protein Synthesis Initiation Factor 4G (eIF4G) with Picornaviral Proteases , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  Robert L. Tanguay,et al.  The tobacco etch viral 5' leader and poly(A) tail are functionally synergistic regulators of translation. , 1995, Gene.

[25]  E. Ehrenfeld.  19 Initiation of Translation by Picornavirus RNAs , 1996 .

[26]  A. Sachs,et al.  Association of the yeast poly(A) tail binding protein with translation initiation factor eIF‐4G. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[27]  C. Hellen,et al.  Canonical eukaryotic initiation factors determine initiation of translation by internal ribosomal entry , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[28]  C. Hellen,et al.  Functional dissection of eukaryotic initiation factor 4F: the 4A subunit and the central domain of the 4G subunit are sufficient to mediate internal entry of 43S preinitiation complexes , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[29]  Robert L. Tanguay,et al.  Translation Initiation Factors eIF-iso4G and eIF-4B Interact with the Poly(A)-binding Protein and Increase Its RNA Binding Activity* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  J. Atabekov,et al.  A tobamovirus genome that contains an internal ribosome entry site functional in vitro. , 1997, Virology.

[31]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Human eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) possesses two separate and independent binding sites for eIF4A , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[32]  J. McCarthy,et al.  The Position Dependence of Translational Regulation via RNA-RNA and RNA-Protein Interactions in the 5′-Untranslated Region of Eukaryotic mRNA Is a Function of the Thermodynamic Competence of 40 S Ribosomes in Translational Initiation* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  N. Gray,et al.  IRP-1 binding to ferritin mRNA prevents the recruitment of the small ribosomal subunit by the cap-binding complex eIF4F. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[34]  M. Hentze,et al.  Translational activation of uncapped mRNAs by the central part of human eIF4G is 5' end-dependent. , 1998, RNA.

[35]  M. Hentze,et al.  Dual function of the messenger RNA cap structure in poly(A)-tail-promoted translation in yeast , 1998, Nature.

[36]  Jean Cohen,et al.  Rotavirus RNA‐binding protein NSP3 interacts with eIF4GI and evicts the poly(A) binding protein from eIF4F , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[37]  M. Muckenthaler,et al.  Poly(A)-tail-promoted translation in yeast: implications for translational control. , 1998, RNA.

[38]  Ribosomal Pausing and Scanning Arrest as Mechanisms of Translational Regulation from Cap-Distal Iron-Responsive Elements , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[39]  C. Fraser,et al.  The Association of Initiation Factor 4F with Poly(A)-binding Protein Is Enhanced in Serum-stimulated Xenopus Kidney Cells* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.