The Effect of Information Technology-Enabled Flexibility on Formation and Market Value of Alliances

This study investigates the effect of information technology IT architecture flexibility on strategic alliance formation and firm value. We first examine the effect of three dimensions of IT architecture flexibility open communication standards, cross-functional transparency, and modularity on formation of three types of alliances arm's-length, collaborative, and joint-venture alliances, respectively. Then, we examine how capabilities in IT flexibility can enhance the value derived from alliances. Our sample includes data from 169 firms that are publicly listed in the United States and that span multiple industries. We find that adoption of open communication standards is associated with the formation of arm's-length alliances, and modularity of IT architecture is associated with the formation of joint ventures. We also find that IT architecture flexibility enhances the value of arm's-length, collaborative, and joint-venture alliances. The contribution of IT flexibility to value is greater in the case of collaborative alliances than in arm's-length alliances. Taken together, these findings suggest that appropriate investments in IT can help to facilitate reconfiguration of resources and modification of processes in collaboration-intensive alliances. This paper was accepted by Ramayya Krishnan, information systems.

[1]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Intangible Assets: Computers and Organizational Capital , 2002 .

[2]  Thomas Erl,et al.  SOA Principles of Service Design , 2007 .

[3]  Marno Verbeek,et al.  Non-response in panel data: The impact on estimates of a life cycle consumption function. , 1992 .

[4]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[5]  Wilhelm Hasselbring,et al.  Information system integration , 2000, CACM.

[6]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Migration to Open-Standard Interorganizational Systems: Network Effects, Switching Costs, and Path Dependency , 2005, MIS Q..

[7]  Jeffrey H. Dyer Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage : Evidence from the auto industry , 1996 .

[8]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Impact of Electronic Data Interchange Technology on JIT Shipments , 1994 .

[10]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Does Information Technology Lead to Smaller Firms , 2011 .

[11]  Melissa A. Schilling Understanding the Alliance Data , 2008 .

[12]  Nancy Bogucki Duncan,et al.  Capturing Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: A Study of Resource Characteristics and their Measure , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Ali Tafti,et al.  Information Technology and Firm Profitability: Mechanisms and Empirical Evidence , 2012, MIS Q..

[14]  A. H. Segars,et al.  Realizing the Promise of E-Business: Developing and Leveraging Electronic Partnering Options , 2006 .

[15]  J. Robins,et al.  A resource‐based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance , 1995 .

[16]  Tilak Mitra,et al.  SOA Governance: Achieving and Sustaining Business and IT Agility , 2008 .

[17]  A SchillingMelissa,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks , 2007 .

[18]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[19]  O. Williamson The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[21]  J. Oxley Appropriability Hazards and Governance in Strategic Alliances: A Transaction Cost Approach , 1997 .

[22]  J. H. Dyer Effective interim collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value , 1997 .

[23]  Robert A. Burgelman,et al.  Managing the Strategic Dynamics of Acquisition Integration: Lessons from Hp and Compaq , 2005 .

[24]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q , 1999 .

[25]  D. Robinson,et al.  Industry Concentration and Average Stock Returns , 2005 .

[26]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  From Association to Causation via a Potential Outcomes Approach , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Dovev Lavie Alliance Portfolios and Firm Performance: A Study of Value Creation and Appropriation in the U.S. Software Industry , 2007 .

[28]  Luba Cherbakov,et al.  Impact of service orientation at the business level , 2005, IBM Syst. J..

[29]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function , 2002 .

[30]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[31]  R. Gulati Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[32]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Information Technology and Firm Boundaries: Evidence from Panel Data , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  Zhou Zhi-hai Introduction to Service-Oriented Software Architecture , 2007 .

[34]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on the Organization of Economic Activity: The "Move to the Middle" Hypothesis , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  O. Williamson Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchange , 1983 .

[36]  M. Venkatraman It-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition , 1994 .

[37]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[38]  Arvin Sahaym,et al.  The Influence of Information Technology on the Use of Loosely Coupled Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[39]  Arun Rai,et al.  Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities , 2006 .

[40]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  The Initial Conditions Problem in Dynamic, Nonlinear Panel Data Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity , 2002 .

[41]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Coordinating for Flexibility in e-Business Supply Chains , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[43]  Anja Vogler,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2004 .

[44]  Sarv Devaraj,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Investments and Diversification Strategies on Firm Performance , 2007 .

[45]  T. Khanna,et al.  Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances , 2000 .

[46]  Sanjeev Dewan,et al.  Firm Characteristics and Investments in Information Technology: Scale and Scope Effects , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[48]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[49]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  Measuring the Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: Exploratory Analysis of a Construct , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Jeffrey H. Dyer EFFECTIVE INTERFIRM COLLABORATION : HOW FIRMS MINIMIZE TRANSACTION COSTS AND MAXIMIZE TRANSACTION VALUE r , 1998 .

[51]  D. Hambrick,et al.  What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field , 2007 .

[52]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Determinants of Electronic Integration in the Insurance Industry: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[53]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[54]  Andrew C. Inkpen Knowledge transfer and international joint ventures: the case of NUMMI and General Motors , 2008 .

[55]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  The Coevolution of Trust, Control, and Learning in Joint Ventures , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[56]  Arun Rai,et al.  Technology investment and business performance , 1997, CACM.

[57]  Andrew McAfee Will web services really transform collaboration , 2005 .

[58]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Are Firms Superior to Alliances and Markets? An Empirical Test of Cross-Border Knowledge Building , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[59]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[60]  R. Gulati,et al.  The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[61]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  The New Age of Innovation: Driving Cocreated Value Through Global Networks , 2008 .

[62]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner-Enabled Market Knowledge Creation , 2005, MIS Q..

[63]  T. W. Anderson An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[64]  Jonathan Whitaker,et al.  Management 9-2007 Is the World Flat or Spiky ? Information Intensity , Skills , and Global Service Disaggregation , 2014 .

[65]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[66]  G. Waring,et al.  Industry Differences in the Persistence of Firm-Specific Returns , 1996 .

[67]  Donna B. Stoddard,et al.  Interorganizational business process redesign: merging technological and process innovation , 1996 .

[68]  Scott A. Moore,et al.  A Foundation for Flexible Automated Electronic Communication , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[69]  Young-YbarraCandace,et al.  Strategic Flexibility in Information Technology Alliances , 1999 .

[70]  Dazhong Wu,et al.  Competitive Environment and the Relationship Between IT and Vertical Integration , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[71]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[72]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Volume 1 , 1999 .

[73]  GurbaxaniVijay,et al.  Does Information Technology Lead to Smaller Firms , 1994 .

[74]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[75]  Sunil Mithas,et al.  Do Auction Parameters Affect Buyer Surplus in E-Auctions for Procurement? , 2009 .

[76]  Arthur J. Keown,et al.  Do strategic alliances create value , 1997 .

[77]  Anitesh Barua,et al.  An Economic Analysis of the Introduction of an Electronic Data Interchange System , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[78]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Mutual commitment to support exchange: relation‐specific IT system as a substitute for managerial hierarchy , 2006 .

[79]  R. Gulati Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[80]  Candace E Young-Ybarra,et al.  Strategic Flexibility in Information Technology Alliances: the Influence of Transaction Cost Economics and Social Exchange Theory , 1999 .

[81]  Sofus A. Macskassy,et al.  More than Words: Quantifying Language to Measure Firms' Fundamentals the Authors Are Grateful for Assiduous Research Assistance from Jie Cao and Shuming Liu. We Appreciate Helpful Comments From , 2007 .

[82]  Allan Afuah How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? , 2000 .

[83]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[84]  Sunil Mithas,et al.  Buyer Intention to Use Internet-Enabled Reverse Auctions: The Role of Asset Specificity, Product Specialization, and Non-Contractibility , 2008, MIS Q..

[85]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .