Mapping individual differences in cortical architecture using multi-view representation learning

In neuroscience, understanding inter-individual differences has recently emerged as a major challenge, for which functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has proven invaluable. For this, neuroscientists rely on basic methods such as univariate linear correlations between single brain features and a score that quantifies either the severity of a disease or the subject’s performance in a cognitive task. However, to this date, task-fMRI and resting-state fMRI have been exploited separately for this question, because of the lack of methods to effectively combine them. In this paper, we introduce a novel machine learning method which allows combining the activation- and connectivity-based information respectively measured through these two fMRI protocols to identify markers of individual differences in the functional organization of the brain. It combines a multi-view deep autoencoder which is designed to fuse the two fMRI modalities into a joint representation space within which a predictive model is trained to guess a scalar score that characterizes the patient. Our experimental results demonstrate the ability of the proposed method to outperform competitive approaches and to produce interpretable and biologically plausible results.

[1]  Shiliang Sun,et al.  Multi-view learning overview: Recent progress and new challenges , 2017, Inf. Fusion.

[2]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Intrinsic and Task-Evoked Network Architectures of the Human Brain , 2014, Neuron.

[3]  Shiguang Shan,et al.  Multi-view Deep Network for Cross-View Classification , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[4]  Ruifan Li,et al.  Cross-modal Retrieval with Correspondence Autoencoder , 2014, ACM Multimedia.

[5]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  V. Koltchinskii,et al.  Nuclear norm penalization and optimal rates for noisy low rank matrix completion , 2010, 1011.6256.

[7]  Naveen Kumar,et al.  Generalized Multiview Shared Subspace Learning Using View Bootstrapping , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  Pascal Belin,et al.  Functional connectivity within the voice perception network and its behavioural relevance , 2018, NeuroImage.

[9]  Pascal Belin,et al.  Single-trial fMRI activation maps measured during the InterTVA event-related voice localizer. A data set ready for inter-subject pattern analysis , 2020, Data in brief.

[10]  Juhan Nam,et al.  Multimodal Deep Learning , 2011, ICML.

[11]  Jonathan E. Taylor,et al.  Interpretable whole-brain prediction analysis with GraphNet , 2013, NeuroImage.

[12]  Ming Yang,et al.  A Survey of Multi-View Representation Learning , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[13]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[14]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex , 2000, Nature.

[15]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Manifold Regularization: A Geometric Framework for Learning from Labeled and Unlabeled Examples , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[16]  Pascal Belin,et al.  The Glasgow Voice Memory Test: Assessing the ability to memorize and recognize unfamiliar voices , 2017, Behavior research methods.

[17]  Junlong Zhao,et al.  Trace regression model with simultaneously low rank and row(column) sparse parameter , 2017, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[18]  Peter Szolovits,et al.  Unsupervised Multimodal Representation Learning across Medical Images and Reports , 2018, ArXiv.

[19]  Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski,et al.  The human voice areas: Spatial organization and inter-individual variability in temporal and extra-temporal cortices , 2015, NeuroImage.

[20]  Ling Shao,et al.  Discriminative Elastic-Net Regularized Linear Regression , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[22]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Multimodal fusion of brain imaging data: A key to finding the missing link(s) in complex mental illness. , 2016, Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging.

[23]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  Gradient-based algorithms with applications to signal-recovery problems , 2010, Convex Optimization in Signal Processing and Communications.

[24]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  Generalized high-dimensional trace regression via nuclear norm regularization , 2017, Journal of Econometrics.

[25]  M. Seghier,et al.  Interpreting and Utilising Intersubject Variability in Brain Function , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Matthias Hein,et al.  Regularization-Free Estimation in Trace Regression with Symmetric Positive Semidefinite Matrices , 2015, NIPS.

[27]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Prediction of Individual Differences from Neuroimaging Data , 2017, NeuroImage.

[28]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications , 2000, Neural Networks.

[29]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.