Differences in the Temporal Typology of Alcohol Hangover

Background At a group level, hangover severity during the day has been described to follow an inverted U‐shaped curve, with gradually increasing severity scores that, after reaching a peak, gradually decrease toward zero. The aim of this study was to examine if and how individual drinkers' hangover severity scores vary during the day. Methods Data from a survey (Penning et al., 2012) in which 727 drinkers reported on their latest alcohol hangover were reanalyzed. The temporal pattern of each individual's hangover was first categorized as belonging to 1 of 6 types based on predefined temporal characteristics. Results Three dominant hangover patterns emerged as comprising more than 95% of the sample: (i) a continuous decline hangover (Severity Type 1 hangover, 54.5%), (ii) a steady state hangover (Severity Type 2 hangover, 19.1%), and (iii) an inverted U‐shaped curve hangover (Severity Type 3 hangover, 21.8%). Of these 3 patterns, Severity Type 2 hangovers are associated with significantly less alcohol consumption and with having the lowest severity scores of individual hangover symptoms. Severity Type 1 hangovers are associated with having the highest severity of individual hangover symptoms. In line with significantly lower levels of alcohol consumption, Severity Type 2 hangovers were significantly more often observed in women when compared to men. Severity Type 1 hangovers were significantly more common in men than in women. Severity Type 3 hangovers, characterized by the increased presence of gastrointestinal complaints, were equally commonly experienced in men and women. Conclusions This study revealed that the temporal pattern of hangover severity can follow marked interindividual variability. Three common temporal patterns were identified, which are uniquely related to the amount of alcohol consumed and the presence and severity of different individual hangover symptoms. Better understanding of individual differences in hangover typology may help to delineate mechanisms underlying alcohol hangover.

[1]  J. Verster,et al.  The impact of alcohol hangover symptoms on cognitive and physical functioning, and mood , 2017, Human psychopharmacology.

[2]  J. Verster,et al.  Development of a Definition for the Alcohol Hangover: Consumer Descriptions and Expert Consensus. , 2017, Current drug abuse reviews.

[3]  K. Brookhuis,et al.  Characteristics of social drinkers with and without a hangover after heavy alcohol consumption , 2016, Substance abuse and rehabilitation.

[4]  J. Verster,et al.  Measurement of alcohol hangover severity: development of the Alcohol Hangover Severity Scale (AHSS) , 2012, Psychopharmacology.

[5]  G. Crepaldi The G.B. Morgagni Medal 2010 , 2012, European journal of clinical investigation.

[6]  J. Verster,et al.  Alcohol hangover symptoms and their contribution to the overall hangover severity. , 2012, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[7]  J. McGeary,et al.  The alcohol hangover research group consensus statement on best practice in alcohol hangover research. , 2010, Current drug abuse reviews.

[8]  S. Minsky,et al.  The Acute Hangover Scale: A new measure of immediate hangover symptoms. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[9]  W. Slutske,et al.  Development and initial validation of the Hangover Symptoms Scale: prevalence and correlates of Hangover Symptoms in college students. , 2003, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[10]  M. Huttunen,et al.  Metabolic Studies on the Pathogenesis of Hangover , 1974, European journal of clinical investigation.