Process Flexibility Revisited: The Graph Expander and Its Applications

We examine how to design a flexible process structure for a production system to match supply with demand more effectively. We argue that good flexible process structures are essentially highly connected graphs, and we use the concept of graph expansion (a measure of graph connectivity) to achieve various insights into this design problem. Whereas existing literature on process flexibility has focused on the expected performance of process structure, we analyze in this paper the worst-case performance of the flexible structure design problem under a more general setting, which encompasses a large class of objective functions. Chou et al. [Chou, M. C., G. Chua, C. P. Teo, H. Zheng. 2010. Design for process flexibility: Efficiency of the long chain and sparse structure. Oper. Res.58(1) 43--58] showed the existence of a sparse process structure that performs nearly as well as the fully flexible system on average, but the approach using random sampling yields few insights into the nature of the process structure. We show that the ψ-expander structure, a variant of the graph expander structure (a highly connected but sparse graph) often used in communication networks, is within e-optimality of the fully flexible system for all demand scenarios. Furthermore, the same expander structure works uniformly well for all objective functions in our class. Based on this insight, we derive design guidelines for general nonsymmetrical systems and develop a simple and easy-to-implement heuristic to design flexible process structures. Numerical results show that this simple heuristic performs well for a variety of numerical examples previously studied in the literature and compares favourably even with the best solutions obtained via extensive simulation and known demand distribution.

[1]  Stephan Biller,et al.  Managing Flexible Capacity in a Make-to-Order Environment , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[2]  M. Fiedler Algebraic connectivity of graphs , 1973 .

[3]  Ramandeep S. Randhawa,et al.  Optimal Flexibility Configurations in Newsvendor Networks: Going Beyond Chaining and Pairing , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Avi Wigderson,et al.  Entropy waves, the zig-zag graph product, and new constant-degree expanders and extractors , 2000, Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[5]  Nils Rudi,et al.  Newsvendor Networks: Inventory Management and Capacity Investment with Discretionary Activities , 2002, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[6]  Stephen C. Graves,et al.  Process Flexibility in Supply Chains , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Saif Benjaafar,et al.  Modeling and analysis of flexible queueing systems , 2004 .

[8]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Benefits of Skill Chaining in Serial Production Lines with Cross-Trained Workers , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Chung-Piaw Teo,et al.  Design for Process Flexibility: Efficiency of the Long Chain and Sparse Structure , 2010, Oper. Res..

[10]  A. Raturi,et al.  MEASURING AND COMPARING VOLUME FLEXIBILITY IN THE CAPITAL GOODS INDUSTRY , 2003 .

[11]  Joel Friedman,et al.  A proof of Alon's second eigenvalue conjecture and related problems , 2004, ArXiv.

[12]  P. Sarnak What is . . . An expander , 2004 .

[13]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey , 1990 .

[14]  Seyed M. R. Iravani,et al.  Structural Flexibility: A New Perspective on the Design of Manufacturing and Service Operations , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Fikri Karaesmen,et al.  Characterizing the performance of process flexibility structures , 2007, Oper. Res. Lett..

[16]  Saifallah Benjaafar,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of Congestion in the Design of Facility Layouts , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Benefits of Skill Chaining in Production Lines with Cross-Trained Workers: An Extended Abstract , 2002, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[18]  William C. Jordan,et al.  Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility , 1995 .

[19]  Robert Michael Tanner,et al.  A recursive approach to low complexity codes , 1981, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[20]  R. Häggkvist,et al.  Bipartite graphs and their applications , 1998 .

[21]  A. Wigderson,et al.  ENTROPY WAVES, THE ZIG-ZAG GRAPH PRODUCT, AND NEW CONSTANT-DEGREE , 2004, math/0406038.

[22]  M. Pinsker,et al.  On the complexity of a concentrator , 1973 .

[23]  D. Upton The Management of Manufacturing Flexibility , 1994 .

[24]  Dailun Shi,et al.  A survey of manufacturing flexibility: Implications for e-business flexibility , 2003, IBM Syst. J..

[25]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Growing Well-connected Graphs , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[26]  Benjamin Van Roy,et al.  On Constraint Sampling in the Linear Programming Approach to Approximate Dynamic Programming , 2004, Math. Oper. Res..