Ontogeny of manipulative behavior and nut-cracking in young tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): a perception-action perspective.

How do capuchin monkeys learn to use stones to crack open nuts? Perception-action theory posits that individuals explore producing varying spatial and force relations among objects and surfaces, thereby learning about affordances of such relations and how to produce them. Such learning supports the discovery of tool use. We present longitudinal developmental data from semifree-ranging tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) to evaluate predictions arising from Perception-action theory linking manipulative development and the onset of tool-using. Percussive actions bringing an object into contact with a surface appeared within the first year of life. Most infants readily struck nuts and other objects against stones or other surfaces from 6 months of age, but percussive actions alone were not sufficient to produce nut-cracking sequences. Placing the nut on the anvil surface and then releasing it, so that it could be struck with a stone, was the last element necessary for nut-cracking to appear in capuchins. Young chimpanzees may face a different challenge in learning to crack nuts: they readily place objects on surfaces and release them, but rarely vigorously strike objects against surfaces or other objects. Thus the challenges facing the two species in developing the same behavior (nut-cracking using a stone hammer and an anvil) may be quite different. Capuchins must inhibit a strong bias to hold nuts so that they can release them; chimpanzees must generate a percussive action rather than a gentle placing action. Generating the right actions may be as challenging as achieving the right sequence of actions in both species. Our analysis suggests a new direction for studies of social influence on young primates learning sequences of actions involving manipulation of objects in relation to surfaces.

[1]  Tetsuro Matsuzawa,et al.  Primate Origins of Human Cognition and Behavior , 2001, Springer Japan.

[2]  K. Connolly,et al.  The Emergence of a Tool-Using Skill in Infancy. , 1989 .

[3]  J. Hayashi [Sampling methods]. , 1982, Josanpu zasshi = The Japanese journal for midwife.

[4]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  The Complete Capuchin: The Biology of the Genus Cebus , 2004 .

[5]  D. Fragaszy,et al.  Generative aspects of manipulation in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). , 1991, Journal of comparative psychology.

[6]  T. Matsuzawa,et al.  Development of stone tool use by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 1997, Journal of comparative psychology.

[7]  P. Izar,et al.  Watching the best nutcrackers: what capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) know about others’ tool-using skills , 2005, Animal Cognition.

[8]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Implicit (and explicit) learning: acting adaptively without knowing the consequences. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Dorothy M. Fragaszy,et al.  Towards a Biology of Traditions , 2003 .

[10]  Shannon P McPherron,et al.  Stone knapping: the necessary conditions for a uniquely hominin behaviour , 2007 .

[11]  S. Suomi,et al.  Individual differences in object manipulation in a colony of tufted capuchins , 1996 .

[12]  R. Byrne,et al.  THE ONTOGENY OF MANUAL SKILL IN WILD CHIMPANZEES: EVIDENCE FROM FEEDING ON THE FRUIT OF SABA FLORIDA , 2002 .

[13]  R. Ferreira,et al.  Bird Predation and Prey-transfer in Brown Capuchin Monkeys (cebus Apella) , 2008 .

[14]  Rainer Spiegel,et al.  Associative sequence learning in humans. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[15]  D. Fragaszy Making space for traditions , 2003 .

[16]  E. Visalberghi Acquisition of Nut-Cracking Behaviour by 2 Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella) , 1987 .

[17]  D. Biro,et al.  Emergence of a culture in wild chimpan-zees: education by master-apprenticeship , 2001 .

[18]  E B Ottoni,et al.  EthoLog 2.2: A tool for the transcription and timing of behavior observation sessions , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[19]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Socially biased learning in monkeys , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[20]  D. Fragaszy Activity states and motor activity in an infant capuchin monkey (Cebus apella) from birth through eleven weeks. , 1989, Developmental psychobiology.

[21]  D. Fragaszy,et al.  Development of manipulation in capuchin monkeys during the first 6 months. , 1994, Developmental psychobiology.

[22]  K. Laland,et al.  Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. , 2006, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[23]  Jane Goodall,et al.  Great Ape Societies: Minds , 1996 .

[24]  L. Wood,et al.  From the Authors , 2003, European Respiratory Journal.

[25]  Gustavo A. Vázquez,et al.  Implicit sequence learning in a search task , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  P. Izar,et al.  Interaction Between Capuchins and Coatis: Nonagonistic Behaviors and Lack of Predation , 2004, International Journal of Primatology.

[27]  D. Fragaszy,et al.  Choosing and using tools: capuchins (Cebus apella) use a different metric than tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). , 2005, Journal of comparative psychology.

[28]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  Modes of executive control in sequence learning: from stimulus-based to plan-based control. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  K. Hunt Ecological Morphology of Australopithecus afarensis , 1998 .

[31]  S. Suomi,et al.  Development of activity patterns, social interactions, and exploratory behavior in infant tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) , 1995, American journal of primatology.

[32]  T Matsuzawa,et al.  Factors influencing imitation of manipulatory actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 1999, Journal of comparative psychology.

[33]  E. Soetens,et al.  Sequence learning and sequential effects , 2004, Psychological research.

[34]  A. Mizuno,et al.  Palm-fruit cracking behavior of wild black-capped capuchin (Cebus apella) , 1977, Primates.

[35]  Tetsuro Matsuzawa,et al.  Cognitive Development in Chimpanzees , 2021, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.

[36]  E. Ottoni,et al.  Semifree-ranging Tufted Capuchins (Cebus apella) Spontaneously Use Tools to Crack Open Nuts , 2001, International Journal of Primatology.

[37]  D. Fragaszy,et al.  Developmental changes in manipulation in tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) from birth through 2 years and their relation to foraging and weaning. , 1997, Journal of comparative psychology.

[38]  D. Fragaszy,et al.  Exploring by doing: How young chimpanzees discover surfaces through actions with objects , 2005 .

[39]  J. Lockman A perception--action perspective on tool use development. , 2000, Child development.

[40]  P. Izar,et al.  Social play and spatial tolerance in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) , 2004 .

[41]  E. Gibson,et al.  An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and Development , 2000 .

[42]  D. Fragaszy,et al.  Relational spatial reasoning by a nonhuman: the example of capuchin monkeys. , 2005, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[43]  J. Altmann,et al.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. , 1974, Behaviour.

[44]  Tetsuro Matsuzawa,et al.  Great Ape Societies: Chimpanzee intelligence in nature and in captivity: isomorphism of symbol use and tool use , 1996 .

[45]  C. Boesch,et al.  The Chimpanzees of the Tai Forest : Behavioural Ecology and Evolution , 2000 .

[46]  G. Dietrich,et al.  Stone knapping : Khambhat (India), a unique opportunity ? , 2005 .

[47]  T. Matsuzawa,et al.  How does stone-tool use emerge? Introduction of stones and nuts to naïve chimpanzees in captivity , 2005, Primates.

[48]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Handbook of implicit learning , 1998 .

[49]  A. Gesell,et al.  Psychology of Early Growth , 1938 .