Investigation of visual space using an exocentric pointing task

Classically, it has been assumed that visual space can be represented by a metric. This means that the distance between points and the angle between lines can be uniquely defined. However, this assumption has never been tested. Also, measurements outdoors, where monocular cues are abundant, conflict with this model. This paper reports on two experiments in which the structure of visual space was investigated, using an exocentric pointing task. In the first experiment, we measured the influence of the separation between pointer and target and of the orientation of the stimuli with respect to the observer. This was done both monocularly and binocularly. It was found that the deviation of the pointer settings depended linearly on the orientation, indicating that visual space is anisotropic. The deviations for configurations that were symmetrical in the median plane were approximately the same, indicating that left/right symmetry was maintained. The results for monocular and binocular conditions were very different, which indicates that stereopsis was an important cue. In both conditions, there were large deviations from the veridical. In the second experiment, the relative distance of the pointer and the target with respect to the observer was varied in both the monocular and the binocular conditions. The relative distance turned out to be the main parameter for the ranges used (1–5 m). Any distance function must have an expanding and a compressing part in order to describe the data. In the binocular case, the results were much more consistent than in the monocular case and had a smaller standard deviation. Nevertheless, the systematic mispointings remained large. It can therefore be concluded that stereopsis improves space perception but does not improve veridicality.

[1]  A. S. Gilinsky.  Perceived size and distance in visual space. , 1951, Psychological review.

[2]  J M Foley,et al.  Locus of perceived equidistance as a function of viewing distance. , 1966, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  Walter Blumenfeld,et al.  Untersuchungen über die scheinbare Grösse im Sehraume , 1913 .

[4]  L H HARDY,et al.  Investigation of visual space; the Blumenfeld alleys. , 1951, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  A A BLANK,et al.  Analysis of experiments in binocular space perception. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  J. Heller.  On the psychophysics of binocular space perception , 1997 .

[7]  A. Zajączkowska.  Experimental test of Luneburg's theory; horopter and alley experiments. , 1956, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[8]  Franz Hillebrand,et al.  Theorie der scheinbaren Grösse bei binocularem Sehen , 1902 .

[9]  A. Battro,et al.  Riemannian Geometries of Variable Curvature in Visual Space: Visual Alleys, Horopters, and Triangles in Big Open Fields , 1976, Perception.

[11]  A. Zajaczkowska.  Experimental Determination of Luneburg's Constants σ and κ , 1956 .

[12]  Paul M. Laporte,et al.  Mathematical Analysis of Binocular Vision , 1950 .

[13]  Atsuki Higashiyama,et al.  Variation of curvature in binocular visual space estimated by the triangle method , 1981, Vision Research.

[14]  J M Foley,et al.  The size-distance relation and intrinsic geometry of visual space: implications for processing. , 1972, Vision research.

[15]  H Collewijn,et al.  Binocular eye movements and the perception of depth. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[16]  K. N. Leibovic,et al.  BINOCULAR SPACE PERCEPTION , 1972 .

[17]  John M Foley,et al.  Effect of Distance Information and Range on Two Indices of Visually Perceived Distance , 1977, Perception.

[18]  Tarow Indow,et al.  Hyperbolic representation of global structure of visual space , 1997 .

[19]  J. M. Foley.  Binocular distance perception. , 1980, Psychological review.

[20]  Eileen Kowler.  Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[21]  Tarow Indow,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE LUNEBURG THEORY OF BINOCULAR SPACE PERCEPTION (1):THE 3-AND 4-POINT EXPERIMENTS , 1962 .

[22]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  Direction judgement error in computer generated displays and actual scenes , 1991 .

[23]  H. C. Reggini,et al.  Perspectives in Open Spaces: A Geometrical Application of the Thouless Index , 1978, Perception.

[24]  Tarow Indow,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE LUNEBURG THEORY OF BINOCULAR SPACE PERCEPTION (2):THE ALLEY EXPERIMENTS , 1962 .

[25]  J Lukas.  [Visual frontoparallels: a decision experiment on the theories of Blank, Foley and Luneburg]. , 1983, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie.

[26]  T Indow,et al.  Parallel-Alleys and Distance-Alleys on Horopter Plane in the Dark , 1984, Perception.

[27]  T Indow,et al.  A critical review of Luneburg's model with regard to global structure of visual space. , 1991, Psychological review.

[28]  A. A. Blank.  Curvature of Binocular Visual Space. An Experiment , 1961 .

[29]  A. Higashiyama.  Curvature of binocular visual space a modified method of right triangle , 1984, Vision Research.

[30]  John M. Foley,et al.  Desarguesian Property in Visual Space , 1964 .