Tendering procedures, contractual arrangements and Latham: the contractors' view

The procedural and administrative aspects of UK tendering have remained largely unaltered for decades but this may soon change in light of the recent review of the construction sector, headed by Sir Michael Latham. This paper presents findings of a nationwide survey of UK construction contractors assessing their opinion of the Latham procurement recommendations, along with their opinion of the authors' proposals for alternative selection procedure. Contractor usage/opinion of current tendering methods, tendering documentation and contractual arrangements are also identified. Analysis techniques primarily involve the derivation of contractor preference, agreement and importance indices (Pri, Agi and Imi respectively). Results show that clients are attempting to cut costs by increased use of open tendering coupled with plan and specification tender documentation, but that savings are offset by clients ultimately paying for contractors' costs associated with their achieving contract award for only 1 in 5 bids. Generally, contractors are in tune with the ideals of the Latham review and characteristics pertaining to the HOLT (Highlight Optimum Legitimate Tender) selection technique.

[1]  Gary David Holt,et al.  Evaluating performance potential in the selection of construction contractors , 1994 .

[2]  F. C. Harris,et al.  Delays on Large Construction Projects , 1986 .

[3]  Abdulaziz A. Bubshait,et al.  Owner Involvement in Construction Projects in Saudi Arabia , 1992 .

[4]  G. D. Holt,et al.  Factors influencing U.K. construction clients' choice of contractor , 1994 .

[5]  Gary David Holt,et al.  Application of an alternative contractor selection model , 1995 .

[6]  Paul. Olomolaiye,et al.  Quantifying client-generated risk by project consultants , 1995 .

[7]  Gary David Holt,et al.  A conceptual alternative to current tendering practice , 1993 .

[8]  Gary David Holt,et al.  Evaluating prequalification criteria in contractor selection , 1994 .

[9]  Byron L. Newton,et al.  Statistics for Business , 1973 .

[10]  Gary David Holt,et al.  Incorporating project specific criteria and client utility into the evaluation of construction tenderers , 1994 .

[11]  P. Olomolaiye,et al.  An evaluation of clients' needs and responsibilities in the construction process , 1995 .

[12]  Paul. Olomolaiye,et al.  Attributes of UK construction clients influencing project consultants' performance , 1994 .

[13]  D. J. White,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making – A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1982 .

[14]  A. Shash.  Factors considered in tendering decisions by top UK contractors , 1993 .

[15]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[16]  Paul. Olomolaiye,et al.  Problems influencing craftsmen's productivity in Nigeria , 1987 .

[17]  Gary David Holt,et al.  A review of contractor selection practice in the U.K. construction industry , 1995 .