Highly Variable Microbiota Development in the Chicken Gastrointestinal Tract

Studies investigating the role that complex microbiotas associated with animals and humans play in health and wellbeing have been greatly facilitated by advances in DNA sequencing technology. Due to the still relatively high sequencing costs and the expense of establishing and running animal trials and collecting clinical samples, most of the studies reported in the literature are limited to a single trial and relatively small numbers of samples. Results from different laboratories, investigating similar trials and samples, have often produced quite different pictures of microbiota composition. This study investigated batch to batch variations in chicken cecal microbiota across three similar trials, represented by individually analysed samples from 207 birds. Very different microbiota profiles were found across the three flocks. The flocks also differed in the efficiency of nutrient use as indicated by feed conversion ratios. In addition, large variations in the microbiota of birds within a single trial were noted. It is postulated that the large variability in microbiota composition is due, at least in part, to the lack of colonisation of the chicks by maternally derived bacteria. The high hygiene levels maintained in modern commercial hatcheries, although effective in reducing the burden of specific diseases, may have the undesirable effect of causing highly variable bacterial colonization of the gut. Studies in humans and other animals have previously demonstrated large variations in microbiota composition when comparing individuals from different populations and from different environments but this study shows that even under carefully controlled conditions large variations in microbiota composition still occur.

[1]  G. Harhay,et al.  Animal-to-Animal Variation in Fecal Microbial Diversity among Beef Cattle , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[2]  Jean Thioulouse,et al.  The ade4 package - I : One-table methods , 2004 .

[3]  Guangxing Li,et al.  Effect of Bacillus-based direct-fed microbials on Eimeria maxima infection in broiler chickens. , 2010, Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases.

[4]  S. Dowd,et al.  Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in cecal contents of laying hens fed various molting diets by using bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing. , 2009, Poultry science.

[5]  I. Strannegård,et al.  Reduced Enterobacterial and Increased Staphylococcal Colonization of the Infantile Bowel: An Effect of Hygienic Lifestyle? , 2006, Pediatric Research.

[6]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  Intestinal microbiota associated with differential feed conversion efficiency in chickens , 2012, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[7]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS APPLICATIONS NOTE , 2001 .

[8]  G. Siragusa,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the intestinal bacterial community in one‐ to three‐week‐old commercially reared broiler chickens fed conventional or antibiotic‐free vegetable‐based diets , 2006, Journal of applied microbiology.

[9]  Zhongtang Yu,et al.  Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. , 2004, BioTechniques.

[10]  Yulong Yin,et al.  16S rRNA gene-based analysis of mucosa-associated bacterial community and phylogeny in the chicken gastrointestinal tracts: from crops to ceca. , 2007, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[11]  B. Methé,et al.  Analyses of the Stability and Core Taxonomic Memberships of the Human Microbiome , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  B. Finlay,et al.  Antibiotic-Induced Perturbations of the Intestinal Microbiota Alter Host Susceptibility to Enteric Infection , 2008, Infection and Immunity.

[13]  H. Zerby,et al.  Interrelations between the Microbiotas in the Litter and in the Intestines of Commercial Broiler Chickens , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  J. Apajalahti,et al.  Characteristics of the gastrointestinal microbial communities, with special reference to the chicken , 2004 .

[15]  J. Salanitro,et al.  Isolation, culture characteristics, and identification of anaerobic bacteria from the chicken cecum. , 1974, Applied microbiology.

[16]  R. Knight,et al.  Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Rob Knight,et al.  UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection , 2011, Bioinform..

[18]  J. Garssen,et al.  Early life: gut microbiota and immune development in infancy. , 2010, Beneficial microbes.

[19]  Gabor T. Marth,et al.  Pyrobayes: an improved base caller for SNP discovery in pyrosequences , 2008, Nature Methods.

[20]  R. Joerger,et al.  16S rRNA-Based Analysis of Microbiota from the Cecum of Broiler Chickens , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  T. Næs,et al.  Abrupt Temporal Fluctuations in the Chicken Fecal Microbiota Are Explained by Its Gastrointestinal Origin , 2012, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  Eoin L. Brodie,et al.  Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[23]  J. Delgenès,et al.  Characterisation of the microbial diversity in a pig manure storage pit using small subunit rDNA sequence analysis. , 2005, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[24]  Richard E. Isaacson,et al.  Modulations of the Chicken Cecal Microbiome and Metagenome in Response to Anticoccidial and Growth Promoter Treatment , 2011, PloS one.

[25]  J. Chun,et al.  EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. , 2007, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[26]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  Changes in the caecal microflora of chickens following Clostridium perfringens challenge to induce necrotic enteritis. , 2012, Veterinary microbiology.

[27]  William A. Walters,et al.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data , 2010, Nature Methods.

[28]  F. Sisak,et al.  Immune Response of Chicken Gut to Natural Colonization by Gut Microflora and to Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Infection , 2011, Infection and Immunity.

[29]  A. J. Jones,et al.  At Least 1 in 20 16S rRNA Sequence Records Currently Held in Public Repositories Is Estimated To Contain Substantial Anomalies , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.