Closer to an Understanding of Fate: The Role of Vascular Complications in Free Flap Breast Reconstruction

Background: Flap loss in autologous breast reconstruction is almost invariably a result of a vascular event; however, not all events portend the same fate. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative vascular complications predict subsequent postoperative vascular thrombosis and flap loss. Methods: This was a retrospective review of all free flaps performed between 2005 and 2010 in the University of Pennsylvania Health System for breast reconstruction. Details of all vascular thromboses and intraoperative technical difficulties were recorded. Flaps with a routine intraoperative course were compared with those with an intraoperative complication. Results: Overall, 1173 free flaps were performed in 804 patients. In regression analysis, an intraoperative vascular complication was the only independent predictor of a subsequent delayed vascular complication (odds ratio, 3.11; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.25 to 7.73). In subanalysis, intraoperative arterial thrombosis was not associated with a subsequent delayed arterial thrombosis; however, intraoperative technical difficulties were associated with increased delayed arterial thrombosis (1.0 percent versus 4.2 percent, p = 0.05) and partial flap loss (0.6 percent versus 4.2 percent, p = 0.02). There was a trend toward increased delayed venous thromboses following intraoperative venous thromboses (1.1 percent versus 16.7 percent, p = 0.07). In aggregate, there was a higher rate of complete flap loss following any intraoperative vascular complication (0.9 percent versus 3.5 percent, p = 0.04). Conclusions: In free flap breast reconstruction, an intraoperative vascular problem leads to increased risk of a subsequent postoperative vascular complication and flap loss. Postoperative vascular complications do not appear to be overtly affected by specific surgical intervention or choice of anticoagulation in the setting of a preceding intraoperative problem. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

[1]  S. Sonnad,et al.  Risk Factors and Complications in Free TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction , 2006, Annals of plastic surgery.

[2]  T. Hadlock,et al.  Effects of Aspirin and Low‐Dose Heparin in Head and Neck Reconstruction using Microvascular Free Flaps , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  Mark Hachey,et al.  Breast cancer survivors in the United States , 2009, Cancer.

[4]  Constance M. Chen,et al.  The Effect of Postoperative Anticoagulation on Microvascular Thrombosis , 2007, Annals of plastic surgery.

[5]  T. Dawber,et al.  II. Coronary Heart Disease in the Framingham Study , 1957 .

[6]  Constance M. Chen,et al.  Is the Use of Intraoperative Heparin Safe? , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  T. Dawber,et al.  Coronary heart disease in the Framingham study. , 1957, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[8]  J. P. Watson,et al.  Complications after Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: Experience with 1195 Flaps , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  M. Pencina,et al.  General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study , 2008, Circulation.

[10]  P. Taub,et al.  A Survey of Microvascular Protocols for Lower-Extremity Free Tissue Transfer I: Perioperative Anticoagulation , 2007, Annals of plastic surgery.

[11]  Stephen R. Sullivan,et al.  True Incidence of All Complications following Immediate and Delayed Breast Reconstruction , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  R. Donahue,et al.  Autologous breast reconstruction: the Vanderbilt experience (1998 to 2005) of independent predictors of displeasing outcomes. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.