[1] Effective monitoring is essential for effective pollution control in national and international water systems. To what extent are countries' monitoring choices driven by environmental criteria, as they should be? And to what extent are they also influenced by other factors, such as political and economic conditions? To address these questions, we describe and explain the evolution of one of the most important international environmental monitoring networks in Europe, the one for water quality, in the time period 1965–2004. We develop a geographic information system that contains information on the location of several thousand active monitoring stations in Europe. Using multivariate statistics, we then examine whether and to what extent the spatial and temporal clustering of monitoring intensity is driven by environmental, political, and economic factors. The results show that monitoring intensity is higher in river basins exposed to greater environmental pressure. However, political and economic factors also play a strong role in monitoring decisions: democracy, income, and peer pressure are conducive to monitoring intensity, and monitoring intensity generally increases over time. Moreover, even though monitoring is more intense in international upstream-downstream settings, we observe only a weak bias toward more monitoring downstream of international borders. In contrast, negative effects of European Union (EU) membership and runup to the EU's Water Framework Directive are potential reasons for concern. Our results strongly suggest that international coordination and standardization of water quality monitoring should be intensified. It will be interesting to apply our analytical approach also to other national and international monitoring networks, for instance, the U.S. National Water-Quality Assessment Program or the European Monitoring and Evaluation Program for air pollution.
[1]
Detlef F. Sprinz,et al.
The interest-based explanation of international environmental policy
,
1994,
International Organization.
[2]
J. S. Long,et al.
Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables
,
1997
.
[3]
Eric Neumayer,et al.
Do Democracies Exhibit Stronger International Environmental Commitment? A Cross-country Analysis
,
2002
.
[4]
G. Grossman,et al.
Economic Growth and the Environment
,
1994
.
[5]
T. Bernauer,et al.
Is there an environmental version of the Kantian peace? Insights from water pollution in Europe
,
2008
.
[6]
Heather Ward,et al.
International Linkages and Environmental Sustainability: The Effectiveness of the Regime Network
,
2006
.
[7]
D. Jahn.
Environmental performance and policy regimes: Explaining variations in 18 OECD-countries
,
1998
.
[8]
Eric Neumayer,et al.
Does Trade Openness Promote Multilateral Environmental Cooperation?
,
2002
.
[9]
E. Neumayer,et al.
False Prophet, or Genuine Savior? Assessing the Effects of Economic Openness on Sustainable Development, 1980–99
,
2005,
International Organization.
[10]
K. Gleditsch,et al.
Expanded Trade and GDP Data
,
2002
.
[11]
Rafael Reuveny,et al.
Democracy and Environmental Degradation
,
2006
.
[12]
D. Papkovsky,et al.
Advanced environmental monitoring
,
2008
.