Adaptive decision-making frameworks for dynamic multi-agent organizational change

This article presents a capability called Adaptive Decision-Making Frameworks (ADMF) and shows that it can result in significantly improved system performance across run-time situation changes in a multi-agent system. Specifically, ADMF can result in improved and more robust performance compared to the use of a single static decision-making framework (DMF). The ADMF capability allows agents to dynamically adapt the DMF in which they participate to fit their run-time situation as it changes. A DMF identifies a set of agents and specifies the distribution of decision-making control and the authority to assign subtasks among these agents as they determine how a goal or set of goals should be achieved. The ADMF capability is a form of organizational adaptation and differs from previous approaches to organizational adaptation and dynamic coordination in that it is the first to allow dynamic and explicit manipulation of these DMF characteristics at run-time as variables controlling agent behavior. The approach proposed for selecting DMFs at run-time parameterizes all domain-specific knowledge as characteristics of the agents’ situation, so the approach is application-independent. The presented evaluation empirically shows that, for at least one multi-agent system, there is no one best DMF for multiple agents across run-time situational changes. Next, it motivates the further exploration of ADMF by showing that adapting DMFs to run-time variations in situation can result in improved overall system performance compared to static or random DMFs.

[1]  A. H. Bond,et al.  An Analysis of Problems and Research in DAI , 1988 .

[2]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Intention is Choice with Commitment , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[3]  K. Suzanne Barber,et al.  The Motivation for Dynamic Decision-Making Frameworks in Multi-Agent Systems , 2001 .

[4]  D. Kortenkamp,et al.  Adjustable control autonomy for manned space flight , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[5]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Relating Quantified Motivations for Organizationally Situated Agents , 1999, ATAL.

[6]  Nancy E. Reed,et al.  Dimensions of Adjustable Autonomy , 2000, PRICAI Workshops.

[7]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Coalitions Among Computationally Bounded Agents , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[8]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents VII. Agent Theories Architectures and Languages , 2000 .

[9]  Sanguk Noh,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of rational communicative behavior in coordinated defense , 1999, AGENTS '99.

[10]  K. Suzanne Barber,et al.  A Communication Protocol Supporting Dynamic Autonomy Agreements in Multi-agent Systems , 2000, PRICAI Workshops.

[11]  Edmund H. Durfee,et al.  Designing organizations for computational agents , 1998 .

[12]  Sanguk Noh,et al.  Towards flexible multi-agent decision-making under time pressure , 1999, IJCAI 1999.

[13]  Zhiang Lin,et al.  The choice between accuracy and errors: a contingency analysis of external conditions and organizational decision making performance , 1998 .

[14]  Sandip Sen,et al.  Searching for optimal coalition structures , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[15]  Gerhard Weiss,et al.  Multiagent Systems , 1999 .

[16]  Katsutoshi Hirayama,et al.  Forming Coalitions for Breaking Deadlocks , 1995, ICMAS.

[17]  Nicholas R. Jennings Agent-Oriented Software Engineering , 1999, MAAMAW.

[18]  K. Suzanne Barber,et al.  Coordinating Distributed Decision Making Using Reusable Interaction Specifications , 2000, PRIMA.

[19]  K. Suzanne Barber,et al.  Autonomy as Decision-Making Control , 2000, ATAL.

[20]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  A One-shot Dynamic Coordination Algorithm for Distributed Sensor Networks , 1993, AAAI.

[21]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Issues in Automated Negotiation and Electronic Commerce: Extending the Contract Net Framework , 1997, ICMAS.

[22]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  An organizational ontology for enterprise modeling , 1998 .

[23]  K. Suzanne Barber,et al.  Strategy Selection-Based Meta-level Reasoning for Multi-agent Problem-Solving , 2009, AOSE.

[24]  Les Gasser,et al.  Representing and using organizational knowledge in DAI systems , 1989 .

[25]  Alan H. Bond,et al.  Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 1988 .

[26]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  The Dynamic Selection of Coordination Mechanisms , 2004, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[27]  Edmund H. Durfee,et al.  Planning in distributed artificial intelligence , 1996 .

[28]  Brahim Chaib-draa,et al.  An overview of distributed artificial intelligence , 1996 .

[29]  K. Suzanne Barber,et al.  Dynamic adaptive autonomy in multi-agent systems , 2000, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[30]  W. Richard Scott Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems , 1981 .

[31]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Agent Architectures for Flexible, Practical Teamwork , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[32]  K. P. Sycara Multiagent systems : Special issue on agents , 1998 .

[33]  Evelina Lamma,et al.  AI*IA 99: Advances in Artificial Intelligence , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[34]  Kathleen S Barber,et al.  Sensible agents: the distributed architecture and test bed , 2000 .

[35]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Methods for Task Allocation via Agent Coalition Formation , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[36]  K. Suzanne Barber,et al.  Adaptive decision-making frameworks for multi-agent systems , 2001 .

[37]  Alan H. Bond,et al.  Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 1988 .

[38]  Diane J. Cook,et al.  Flexible Social Laws , 1995, IJCAI.

[39]  Rino Falcone,et al.  Levels of Delegation and Levels of Adoption as the Basis for Adjustable Autonomy , 1999, AI*IA.

[40]  Karen L. Myers,et al.  Directing Agent Communities : An Initial Framework , 2001 .

[41]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Adjustable autonomy in real-world multi-agent environments , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[42]  Edmund H. Durfee,et al.  Using Partial Global Plans to Coordinate Distributed Problem Solvers , 1987, IJCAI.

[43]  David J. Musliner,et al.  Adjustable Autonomy in Procedural Control for Refineries , 1999 .

[44]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems , 1993, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[45]  Nancy E. Reed,et al.  Advances in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2000 Workshop Reader , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[46]  Afsaneh Haddadi Towards a Pragmatic Theory of Interactions , 1995, ICMAS.

[47]  Pau Klein,et al.  San Francisco, California , 2007 .

[48]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Towards Flexible Teamwork , 1997, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[49]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Coordination techniques for distributed artificial intelligence , 1996 .

[50]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Intelligent Adaptive Information Agents , 1997, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[51]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Organization Self-Design of Distributed Production Systems , 1992, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[52]  Peter Mertens,et al.  Comparisons of Agent Approaches with Centralized Alternatives Based on Logistical Scenarios , 1994, Inf. Syst..

[53]  Yves Demazeau,et al.  Decentralized A.I. 2 : proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France, August 13-16, 1990 , 1991 .

[54]  C. Hardy Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems , 1983 .

[55]  Edmund H. Durfee,et al.  An introduction to congregating in multi-agent systems , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[56]  Munindar P. Singh Group Ability And Structure , 1991 .

[57]  David Kortenkamp,et al.  Adjustable Autonomy for Human-Centered Autonomous Systems on Mars , 1998 .

[58]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Foundations of distributed artificial intelligence , 1996, Sixth-generation computer technology series.

[59]  John Davin,et al.  Impact of problem centralization in distributed constraint optimization algorithms , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[60]  K. Sycara,et al.  This Is a Publication of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence Multiagent Systems Multiagent System Issues and Challenges Individual Agent Reasoning Task Allocation Multiagent Planning Recognizing and Resolving Conflicts Managing Communication Modeling Other Agents Managing Resources , 2022 .

[61]  Larry M. Stephens,et al.  Agent Organization as an Effector of DAI System Performance , 1989 .

[62]  J. Susan Milton,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Statistics: Principles and Applications for Engineering and the Computing Sciences , 1990 .

[63]  Al Young Providence, Rhode Island , 1975 .

[64]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Coalition formation for large-scale electronic markets , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[65]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[66]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Commitments: From Individual Intentions to Groups and Organizations , 1995, ICMAS.