Integrated multilaboratory systems biology reveals differences in protein metabolism between two reference yeast strains.

The field of systems biology is often held back by difficulties in obtaining comprehensive, high-quality, quantitative data sets. In this paper, we undertook an interlaboratory effort to generate such a data set for a very large number of cellular components in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a widely used model organism that is also used in the production of fuels, chemicals, food ingredients and pharmaceuticals. With the current focus on biofuels and sustainability, there is much interest in harnessing this species as a general cell factory. In this study, we characterized two yeast strains, under two standard growth conditions. We ensured the high quality of the experimental data by evaluating a wide range of sampling and analytical techniques. Here we show significant differences in the maximum specific growth rate and biomass yield between the two strains. On the basis of the integrated analysis of the high-throughput data, we hypothesize that differences in phenotype are due to differences in protein metabolism.

[1]  F. Bruggeman,et al.  The nature of systems biology. , 2007, Trends in microbiology.

[2]  F. Zimmermann,et al.  Simultaneous overexpression of enzymes of the lower part of glycolysis can enhance the fermentative capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Yeast.

[3]  Lennart Martens,et al.  The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE) , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Roger Brent,et al.  A partnership between biology and engineering , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Hugh D. Spence,et al.  Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM) , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  Christian L. Barrett,et al.  Systems biology as a foundation for genome-scale synthetic biology. , 2006, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[7]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  High-throughput metabolic state analysis: the missing link in integrated functional genomics of yeasts. , 2005, The Biochemical journal.

[8]  Barbara M. Bakker,et al.  The fluxes through glycolytic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are predominantly regulated at posttranscriptional levels , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  T. Ideker,et al.  Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Journal of biology.

[10]  Ralf Takors,et al.  Standard reporting requirements for biological samples in metabolomics experiments: microbial and in vitro biology experiments , 2007, Metabolomics.

[11]  Fred Winston,et al.  Construction of a set of convenient saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C , 1995, Yeast.

[12]  Barbara M. Bakker,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the High Temperature-induced Glycolytic Flux Increase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Reveals Dominant Metabolic Regulation* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  J. Heijnen,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of intracellular metabolite extraction techniques for yeast metabolomics. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  Barbara M. Bakker,et al.  Measuring enzyme activities under standardized in vivo‐like conditions for systems biology , 2010, The FEBS journal.

[15]  Jason E. Stewart,et al.  Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[16]  Johannes H. de Winde,et al.  Dynamics of Glycolytic Regulation during Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Fermentative Metabolism , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[17]  M. Penttilä,et al.  Rapid and multiplexed transcript analysis of microbial cultures using capillary electophoresis-detectable oligonucleotide probe pools. , 2006, Journal of microbiological methods.

[18]  I. Marison,et al.  Thermodynamics of microbial growth and metabolism: an analysis of the current situation. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[19]  Duboc,et al.  An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. , 2000, Enzyme and microbial technology.

[20]  J. Pronk,et al.  Reproducibility of Oligonucleotide Microarray Transcriptome Analyses , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  Otero Romero,et al.  Industrial Systems Biology and Metabolic Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2009 .

[22]  K. Dam,et al.  A method for the determination of changes of glycolytic metabolites in yeast on a subsecond time scale using extraction at neutral pH. , 1992 .

[23]  J. Pronk,et al.  Prolonged selection in aerobic, glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae causes a partial loss of glycolytic capacity. , 2005, Microbiology.

[24]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Improved rapid sampling for in vivo kinetics of intracellular metabolites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[25]  Jens Nielsen,et al.  Architecture of transcriptional regulatory circuits is knitted over the topology of bio-molecular interaction networks , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[26]  F Baganz,et al.  Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome. , 1998, Trends in biotechnology.

[27]  Roger E Bumgarner,et al.  Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. , 2001, Science.

[28]  Lennart Martens,et al.  PRIDE: The proteomics identifications database , 2005, Proteomics.

[29]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[30]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Uncovering transcriptional regulation of metabolism by using metabolic network topology. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  H. Kitano Systems Biology: A Brief Overview , 2002, Science.

[32]  Quantitative analysis of yeast gene function using competition experiments in continuous culture , 1998, Yeast.

[33]  J. Boeke,et al.  Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: A useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR‐mediated gene disruption and other applications , 1998, Yeast.

[34]  Pronk,et al.  Regulation of fermentative capacity and levels of glycolytic enzymes in chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Enzyme and microbial technology.

[35]  Lennart Martens,et al.  The Proteomics Identifications database: 2010 update , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[36]  F. Zimmermann,et al.  Overproduction of glycolytic enzymes in yeast , 1989, Yeast.

[37]  Mats Akesson,et al.  Simultaneous analysis of amino and nonamino organic acids as methyl chloroformate derivatives using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2003, Analytical biochemistry.