Multiscale mechanical design of the lightweight, stiff, and damage-tolerant cuttlebone: a computational study.

Cuttlebone, the endoskeleton of cuttlefish, offers an intriguing biological structural model for designing low-density cellular ceramics with high stiffness and damage tolerance. Cuttlebone is highly porous (porosity ∼93%) and lightweight (density less than 20% of seawater), constructed mainly by brittle aragonite (95 wt%), but capable of sustaining hydrostatic water pressures over 20 atmospheres and exhibits energy absorption capability under compression comparable to many metallic foams (∼4.4 kJ/kg). Here we computationally investigate how such a remarkable mechanical efficiency is enabled by the multiscale structure of cuttlebone. Using the common cuttlefish, Sepia Officinalis, as a model system, we first conducted high-resolution synchrotron micro-computed tomography (µ-CT) and quantified the cuttlebone's multiscale geometry, including the 3D asymmetric shape of individual walls, the wall assembly patterns, and the long-range structural gradient of walls across the entire cuttlebone (ca. 55 chambers). The acquired 3D structural information enables systematic finite-element simulations, which further reveal the multiscale mechanical design of cuttlebone: at the wall level, wall asymmetry provides optimized energy absorption while maintaining high structural stiffness; at the chamber level, variation of walls (number, pattern, and waviness amplitude) contributes to progressive damage; at the entire skeletal level, the gradient of chamber heights tailors the local mechanical anisotropy of the cuttlebone for reduced stress concentration. Our results provide integrated insights into understanding the cuttlebone's multiscale mechanical design and provide useful knowledge for the designs of lightweight cellular ceramics. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Cuttlebone has been demonstrated to be a biological ceramic cellular material with remarkable lightweight, high stiffness and energy absorption. However, our knowledge on how such mechanical properties are enabled by cuttlebone's multiscale structure is not complete. Here we combine systematic tomography-based 3D structural analysis and finite-element simulations to reveal how the hierarchical structure of cuttlebone at multiple length scales synergistically contribute to cuttlebone's impressive mechanical efficiency. These findings have important implications for designing biomimetic low-density cellular ceramic materials.

[1]  Hao Bai,et al.  Mechanically Efficient Cellular Materials Inspired by Cuttlebone , 2021, Advanced materials.

[2]  Zian Jia,et al.  Mechanical design of the highly porous cuttlebone: A bioceramic hard buoyancy tank for cuttlefish , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Lixiao Li,et al.  Topology optimization-guided lattice composites and their mechanical characterizations , 2019, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[4]  Lifeng Wang,et al.  3D Printing of Biomimetic Composites with Improved Fracture Toughness , 2018, Acta Materialia.

[5]  D. Salem,et al.  Topology Optimization of Lightweight Lattice Structural Composites Inspired by Cuttlefish Bone , 2019, Applied Composite Materials.

[6]  P. Fratzl,et al.  Crack driving force in twisted plywood structures. , 2017, Acta biomaterialia.

[7]  H. Wadley,et al.  Mechanical metamaterials at the theoretical limit of isotropic elastic stiffness , 2017, Nature.

[8]  P. Krueger,et al.  Turning performance in squid and cuttlefish: unique dual-mode, muscular hydrostatic systems , 2016, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[9]  S. Zachow,et al.  A new approach using high-resolution computed tomography to test the buoyant properties of chambered cephalopod shells , 2015, Paleobiology.

[10]  Shiwei Zhou,et al.  Cuttlebone: Characterisation, application and development of biomimetic materials , 2012 .

[11]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[12]  Brian Derby,et al.  Characterizing the elastic properties of tissues. , 2011, Materials today.

[13]  Markus J Buehler,et al.  Deformation and failure of protein materials in physiologically extreme conditions and disease. , 2009, Nature materials.

[14]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  The mechanical efficiency of natural materials , 2004 .

[15]  K. Sherrard Cuttlebone morphology limits habitat depth in eleven species of Sepia (Cephalopoda: Sepiidae). , 2000, The Biological bulletin.

[16]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A new method for the model‐independent assessment of thickness in three‐dimensional images , 1997 .

[17]  S. Boletzky,et al.  Morphometrics of the shell of three Sepia species (Mollusca: Cephalopoda): intra- and interspecific variation , 1997 .

[18]  D. Jacobs Chambered cephalopod shells, buoyancy, structure and decoupling; history and red herrings , 1996 .

[19]  M. Boyce,et al.  A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials , 1993 .

[20]  R. S. Lakes,et al.  Cellular solids: L. J. Gibson and M. F. Ashby, Pergamon Press, 1988, 357 pp, $95.00 hard cover, $40.00 soft cover , 1989 .

[21]  S. Boletzky,et al.  Shell implosion depth and implosion morphologies in three species of Sepia (Cephalopoda) from the Mediterranean Sea , 1984, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[22]  E. Denton,et al.  The Distribution of Gas and Liquid within the Cuttlebone , 1961, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[23]  E. Denton,et al.  The Osmotic Mechanism of the Cuttlebone , 1961, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.