Establishing Design Strategies and an Assessment Tool of Home Appliances to Promote Sustainable Behavior for the New Poor

Environmental benefits related to home appliance life cycles depend on how these products are used. Designing home appliances that promote sustainable behavior is an effective way to reduce environmental impacts. This study aimed to increase relevant opportunities for promoting sustainable behavior practices on the new poor through home appliances, which is rarely discussed in the fields of design for sustainable behavior (DfSB) and product design. In particular, relevant assessment tools or indicators are lacking in DfSB, and people’s use of home appliances is generally unsustainable. Therefore, repertory grid technology was used to understand the perceptions of the new poor, develop an assessment tool, and construct design strategies for home appliances that promote sustainable behavior. Data were collected from the new poor and from designers. Through cluster and principal component analyses, three strategy types were proposed that corresponded to different product features, suggestions, and guidance. In addition, the effectiveness and potential of an assessment tool were demonstrated using the Wilcoxon rank test. The findings could be used by designers, retailers, and green marketers to propose effective product design programs that promote sustainable behavior of the new poor during product use.

[1]  Mieke van der Bijl-Brouwer,et al.  Advancing the strategic impact of human-centred design , 2017 .

[2]  L. H. Shu,et al.  Do-it-yourselfers as Lead users for Environmentally Conscious Behavior☆ , 2014 .

[3]  Tracy Bhamra,et al.  Design for Sustainable Behaviour: Using Products to Change Consumer Behaviour , 2011 .

[4]  J. Cavanagh,et al.  Poorer Countries and the Environment: Friends or Foes? , 2015 .

[5]  Marie Hebrok,et al.  Household food waste: Drivers and potential intervention points for design – An extensive review , 2017 .

[6]  Li-Hsing Shih,et al.  Persuasive Design for Products Leading to Health and Sustainability Using Case-Based Reasoning , 2016 .

[7]  Casper Boks,et al.  User‐centred design for sustainable behaviour , 2008 .

[8]  Maud Rio,et al.  Linking Use Stage Life Cycle Inventories with Product Design Models of Usage , 2016 .

[9]  K. Laitala,et al.  Potential for environmental improvements in laundering , 2011 .

[10]  Seok-Won Lee,et al.  REASSURE: Requirements elicitation for adaptive socio-technical systems using repertory grid , 2017, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[11]  Stephen Skippon,et al.  How consumer drivers construe vehicle performance: Implications for electric vehicles , 2014 .

[12]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Environmental Impacts of Products: A Detailed Review of Studies , 2006 .

[13]  H. V. Trijp,et al.  Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques , 2005 .

[14]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  The research-practice gap: the need for translational developers , 2010, INTR.

[15]  Peter J. M. Sonnemans,et al.  Quality and Reliability Problems from a Consumer's Perspective: an Increasing Problem Overlooked by Businesses? , 2006, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[16]  Debra Lilley,et al.  Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions , 2009 .

[17]  Mark Easterby-Smith,et al.  The Design, Analysis and Interpretation of Repertory Grids , 1980, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[18]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  Why young people do things for the environment: The role of parenting for adolescents’ motivation to engage in pro-environmental behaviour , 2017 .

[19]  Sawasd Tantaratana,et al.  Nonparametric distributed detector using Wilcoxon statistics , 1997, Signal Process..

[20]  G. Zinkhan,et al.  The complexity of consumers' cognitive structures and its relevance to consumer behavior , 2004 .

[21]  Tom Clements,et al.  Evidence of Payments for Ecosystem Services as a mechanism for supporting biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods , 2014 .

[22]  Axel Franzen,et al.  Environmental Attitudes in Cross-National Perspective: A Multilevel Analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000 , 2010 .

[23]  O. B. Assaraf,et al.  The repertory grid as a tool for evaluating the development of students’ ecological system thinking abilities , 2014 .

[24]  Philip Cash,et al.  Behavioural design: A process for integrating behaviour change and design , 2017 .

[25]  Rossitza Setchi,et al.  Integrated eco-design decision-making for sustainable product development , 2015 .

[26]  Jui-Che Tu,et al.  Developing Blue Ocean Strategy of Sustainable Product Design and Development for Business Opportunities of BOP Groups in Taiwan , 2014 .

[27]  Liyanage Devangi H. Perera,et al.  Have Economic Growth And Institutional Quality Contributed To Poverty And Inequality Reduction In Asia , 2013 .

[28]  Casper Boks,et al.  A classification of user research methods for design for sustainable behaviour , 2015 .

[29]  Science curriculum components favoured by high school students in Taiwan , 2003 .

[30]  Jinjuan She,et al.  Seven cognitive concepts for successful eco-design , 2015 .

[31]  M. Binswanger.  Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? , 2001 .

[32]  Tracy Bhamra,et al.  Putting consumers first in design for sustainable behaviour: a case study of reducing environmental impacts of cold appliance use , 2012 .

[33]  Aykut Coskun,et al.  Promoting sustainability through behavior change: A review , 2015 .

[34]  Håkon Sælen,et al.  'Nudging' hotel guests to reduce food waste as a win-win environmental measure , 2013 .

[35]  C. Vlek,et al.  A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation , 2005 .

[36]  Helen M. Edwards,et al.  The repertory grid technique: Its place in empirical software engineering research , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[37]  Chen Wang,et al.  Repertory grid technique in the development of Tacit-based Decision Support System (TDSS) for sustainable site layout planning , 2011 .

[38]  Peter McGeorge,et al.  The uses of ‘contrived’ knowledge elicitation techniques , 1992 .

[39]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  A product configuration analysis method for emotional design using a personal construct theory , 2014 .

[40]  C. Vlek,et al.  Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour : An integrative review and research agenda , 2009 .

[41]  R. Richardson,et al.  Charcoal, livelihoods, and poverty reduction: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa , 2013 .

[42]  Wei Yan,et al.  An investigation into sustainable product conceptualization using a design knowledge hierarchy and Hopfield network , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[43]  Fabrizio Ceschin,et al.  Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions , 2016 .

[44]  Mujde Erol Genevois,et al.  An integrated QFDE approach for identifying improvement strategies in sustainable product development , 2013 .

[45]  Wei Yan,et al.  A quality-time-cost-oriented strategy for product conceptualization , 2012, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[46]  W. J. Dixon,et al.  Power Under Normality of Several Nonparametric Tests , 1954 .

[47]  T. Dawson,et al.  Poverty alleviation strategies in eastern China lead to critical ecological dynamics. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.