Numerical Research on the Jet-Mixing Mechanism of Convergent Nozzle Excited by a Fluidic Oscillator and an Air Tab

Unsteady numerical simulations, coupled with the SST (Shear Stress Transport) k-ω turbulence model, were conducted to study the mixing-enhancement characteristics of the excited jet generated by the fluidic oscillator and the air tab in a single channel convergent nozzle with an inlet total pressure of 140–200 kPa. Compared with the steady air-tab jet, the sweeping jet generated by the fluidic oscillator has roughly the same penetration in the main flow, but it can induce streamwise vortices and planar vortices of larger scale and longer duration, which is beneficial to enhance jet mixing efficiency in the range of 1.0 DN (DN represents the diameter of the main nozzle outlet) downstream from the main nozzle. When x > 1.0 DN, the jet mixing is mainly dominated by the shear layer between the main jet and the ambient. As the sweeping jet suppresses the expansion of the main jet, which reduces the contact area between the main jet and the ambient, its mixing efficiency is less than that of the air tab in this region. With the increasing inlet total pressure of the fluidic oscillator, the influence range of the sweeping jet is increased, but its mixing efficiency does not increase significantly. In general, the fluidic oscillator can use a small jet flow (<5%) to achieve a high mixing efficiency (i.e., 60% at x = 2.0 DN) at the expense of low total pressure loss (<2.3%), which indicates that it has good engineering applicability.

[1]  C. O. Paschereit,et al.  The interaction between a spatially oscillating jet emitted by a fluidic oscillator and a cross-flow , 2019, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  C. O. Paschereit,et al.  Properties of a sweeping jet emitted from a fluidic oscillator , 2018, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  J. Gregory,et al.  Effects of Exit Fan Angle on the Heat Transfer Performance of Sweeping Jet Impingement , 2018, 2018 International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference.

[4]  J. Gregory,et al.  Effects of Curvature on the Performance of Sweeping Jet Impingement Heat Transfer , 2018 .

[5]  C. O. Paschereit,et al.  Sweeping jet from a fluidic oscillator in crossflow , 2017 .

[6]  J. Gregory,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Sweeping Jet Film Cooling , 2017 .

[7]  C. O. Paschereit,et al.  Effect of Velocity Ratio on the Flow Field of a Spatially Oscillating Jet in Crossflow , 2017 .

[8]  Christian Oliver Paschereit,et al.  Experimental Study on Bluff Body Drag Reduction with Fluidic Oscillators , 2014 .

[9]  C. O. Paschereit,et al.  Increasing the Passive Scalar Mixing Quality of Jets in Crossflow With Fluidics Actuators , 2012 .

[10]  J. McGuirk,et al.  Subsonic Jet Mixing via Active Control Using Steady and Pulsed Control Jets , 2011 .

[11]  J. Gregory,et al.  Characterization of the Microfluidic Oscillator , 2007 .

[12]  Hamid Johari,et al.  Scaling of Fully Pulsed Jets in Crossflow , 2006 .

[13]  J. McGuirk,et al.  Flow Control of Jet Mixing Using a Pulsed Fluid Tab Nozzle , 2006 .

[14]  Zhang Yan Experimental and numerical investigations on the vortical structures of an impinging jet in crossflow , 2006 .

[15]  Jeffrey M. Cohen,et al.  Dynamics and Control of an Isolated Jet in Crossflow , 2003 .

[16]  J. Mi,et al.  Mixing Characteristics of a Flapping Jet from a Self-Exciting Nozzle , 2001 .

[17]  Surya Raghu,et al.  Miniature fluidic oscillators for flow and noise control - Transitioning from macro to micro fluidics , 2000 .

[18]  A. Roshko,et al.  Vortical structure in the wake of a transverse jet , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Z. Moussa,et al.  The near field in the mixing of a round jet with a cross-stream , 1977, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  Li Wei Vortex structures of round turbulent jets in cross-flow , 2003 .

[21]  Yasuhiro Kamotani,et al.  Experiments on a Turbulent Jet in a Cross Flow , 1972 .