How to achieve a cooperative mechanism of MSW source separation among individuals — An analysis based on evolutionary game theory

Abstract Existing research on Chinese government's intervention into municipal solid waste (MSW) source separation behaviors mainly concentrates on the one–to–many approach, which lacks specificity and timeliness. This study constructed a reticular cooperative mechanism of MSW source separation for the Chinese government that was influenced and supervised by individuals, and explored the formation conditions of the interpersonal cooperative mechanism in the process of MSW source separation using the evolutionary game method. The results show that during independent separation, individuals always tend to exhibit “free-rider” behavior to enjoy the benefits of other individuals' participation in MSW source separation; this behavior represents a failure of government policy. In cooperative separation, the evolutionary stability strategy of individuals was cooperative separation or non-separation. Furthermore, an effective and stable cooperative relationship among individuals should be developed to promote the public's active participation in MSW source separation. The stability of this relationship was determined by cooperative costs and government restraints because cooperative benefit is a necessary factor to achieve this relationship. A numerical simulation was performed to verify the effects of parameters adjustment on the evolution of source separation behaviors. This study contributes to a new perspective and theoretical guidance for the Chinese government to guide individuals' MSW source separation behaviors, and provides valuable references for other countries about the management of MSW source separation.

[1]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[2]  Y. Fujii Successful Source Separation in Asian Cities: Lessons from Japan's Experience and an Action Research in Thailand , 2008 .

[3]  Todd L. Cherry,et al.  Pigouvian Tax Aversion and Inequity Aversion in the Lab , 2010 .

[4]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Profit Maximization Versus Disadvantageous Inequality: The Impact of Self-Categorization , 2004 .

[5]  Alan Kirman,et al.  The economy as an evolving network , 1997 .

[6]  D. Friedman On economic applications of evolutionary game theory , 1998 .

[7]  Michihiro Kandori Social Norms and Community Enforcement , 1992 .

[8]  M. Nowak,et al.  A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game , 1993, Nature.

[9]  Yong Geng,et al.  An overview of municipal solid waste management in China. , 2010, Waste management.

[10]  Boris Abbey,et al.  Is Technical Analysis Profitable forIndividual Currency Traders? , 2012, The Journal of Portfolio Management.

[11]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Social norms and human cooperation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  C. Plott,et al.  Information Cascades: Replication and an Extension to Majority Rule and Conformity-Rewarding Institutions , 2001 .

[14]  W. Abrahamse,et al.  Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis , 2013 .

[15]  R. Boyd,et al.  In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small- Scale Societies , 2001 .

[16]  Danielle L. Pfaff,et al.  Extending dynamic network theory to group and social interaction analysis , 2016 .

[17]  E. Ostrom Collective action and the evolution of social norms , 2000, Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[18]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Information and the Coase Theorem , 1987 .

[19]  Matthew L. Spitzer,et al.  The Coase Theorem: Some Experimental Tests , 1982, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[20]  A. C. Pigou Economics of welfare , 1920 .

[21]  Akihiko Yanase Global environment and dynamic games of environmental policy in an international duopoly , 2009 .

[22]  R. Coase The Coase Theorem and the Empty Core: A Comment , 1981, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[23]  Alex Rodrigues Nogueira,et al.  Recycling potential of urban solid waste destined for sanitary landfills: the case of Indaiatuba, SP, Brazil. , 2007 .

[24]  David K. Levine,et al.  The evolution of cooperation through imitation , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..

[25]  L. V. Dyne,et al.  Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs , 2003 .

[26]  N. Deniz,et al.  The Relationship between Employee Silence and Organizational Commitment in a Private Healthcare Company , 2013 .

[27]  Soon Keat Tan,et al.  Municipal solid waste management in China: status, problems and challenges. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  Ana B. Ania,et al.  The evolutionary stability of perfectly competitive behavior , 2005 .

[29]  Qingming Luo,et al.  Comparison research on waste classification between China and the EU, Japan, and the USA , 2014 .

[30]  Xiang Shi,et al.  Information Technology Based Municipal Solid Waste Management in Shanghai, China , 2014 .

[31]  R. Damania,et al.  Environmental regulation and financial structure in an oligopoly supergame , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..

[32]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  Brian L. Ott,et al.  The Politics of Negotiating Public Tragedy: Media Framing of the Matthew Shepard Murder , 2002 .