论文信息 - Two models of a PEFC: semi‐analytical vs numerical

Two models of a PEFC: semi‐analytical vs numerical

Semi-analytical quasi-2D (Q2D) model of a PEFC is modified for the case of constant oxygen stoichiometry. The limits of validity of approximation of ideal membrane humidification are established. Q2D and numerical quasi-3D models are compared. Variation of just one parameter enables superimpose the polarization curves obtained from the two models. The profiles of local current density resulting from the two models then differ only by 5%. This suggests, that local 3D effects due to rib/channel alternation can be effectively accounted for within the scope of along-the-channel Q2D model by variation of a single parameter. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

A. A. Kulikovsky

[1] Detlef Stolten,et al. Analytical and Numerical Analysis of PEM Fuel Cell Performance Curves , 2005 .

[2] Ned Djilali,et al. A 3D, Multiphase, Multicomponent Model of the Cathode and Anode of a PEM Fuel Cell , 2003 .

[3] Sirivatch Shimpalee,et al. Verifying Predictions of Water and Current Distributions in a Serpentine Flow Field Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell , 2003 .

[4] A. A. Kulikovsky,et al. The effect of stoichiometric ratio λ on the performance of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell , 2004 .

[5] A. Kulikovsky. The effect of cathodic water on performance of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell , 2004 .

[6] Trung Van Nguyen,et al. Three-dimensional effects of liquid water flooding in the cathode of a PEM fuel cell , 2003 .

[7] Hongtan Liu,et al. A two-phase flow and transport model for the cathode of PEM fuel cells , 2002 .

[8] A. A. Kulikovsky,et al. Semi-analytical 1D + 1D model of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell , 2004 .

[9] Hyunchul Ju,et al. Experimental Validation of a PEM Fuel Cell Model by Current Distribution Data , 2004 .