A comparison of T-wave alternans, signal averaged electrocardiography and programmed ventricular stimulation for arrhythmia risk stratification.

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to compare T-wave alternans (TWA), signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) and programmed ventricular stimulation (EPS) for arrhythmia risk stratification in patients undergoing electrophysiology study. BACKGROUND Accurate identification of patients at increased risk for sustained ventricular arrhythmias is critical to prevent sudden cardiac death. T-wave alternans is a heart rate dependent measure of repolarization that correlates with arrhythmia vulnerability in animal and human studies. Signal-averaged electrocardiography and EPS are more established tests used for risk stratification. METHODS This was a prospective, multicenter trial of 313 patients in sinus rhythm who were undergoing electrophysiologic study. T-wave alternans, assessed with bicycle ergometry, and SAECG were measured before EPS. The primary end point was sudden cardiac death, sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation or appropriate implantable defibrillator (ICD) therapy, and the secondary end point was any of these arrhythmias or all-cause mortality. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the primary end point showed that TWA predicted events with a relative risk of 10.9, EPS had a relative risk of 7.1 and SAECG had a relative risk of 4.5. The relative risks for the secondary end point were 13.9, 4.7 and 3.3, respectively (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis of 11 clinical parameters identified only TWA and EPS as independent predictors of events. In the prespecified subgroup with known or suspected ventricular arrhythmias, TWA predicted primary end points with a relative risk of 6.1 and secondary end points with a relative risk of 8.0. CONCLUSIONS T-wave alternans is a strong independent predictor of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias or death. It performed as well as programmed stimulation and better than SAECG in risk stratifying patients for life-threatening arrhythmias.

[1]  R J Cohen,et al.  Predicting Sudden Cardiac Death From T Wave Alternans of the Surface Electrocardiogram: , 1996, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[2]  R. Cohen,et al.  Electrical alternans during rest and exercise as predictors of vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  S. Connolly,et al.  Randomised trial of outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with frequent or repetitive ventricular premature depolarisations: CAMIAT , 1997, The Lancet.

[4]  S. Hohnloser,et al.  T wave alternans and left ventricular ejection fraction, but not QT variability index, predict appropriate ICD discharge. , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[5]  F. Venditti,et al.  Classification of death in antiarrhythmia trials. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  T. Ikeda,et al.  Combined assessment of T-wave alternans and late potentials used to predict arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction. A prospective study. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  R J Cohen,et al.  T Wave Alternans During Exercise and Atrial Pacing in Humans , 1997, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[8]  M R Gold,et al.  Effect of Heart Rate on T Wave Alternans , 1997, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  R J Cohen,et al.  Electrical alternans and cardiac electrical instability. , 1988, Circulation.

[10]  Bigger Jt,et al.  Prophylactic use of implanted cardiac defibrillators in patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias after coronary-artery bypass graft surgery , 1997 .

[11]  N Engl,et al.  Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. , 1997, Circulation.

[12]  R. Verrier,et al.  Dynamic tracking of cardiac vulnerability by complex demodulation of the T wave. , 1991, Science.

[13]  K. Lee,et al.  A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  A. Moss,et al.  Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Bertram Pitt,et al.  Effect of d-sotalol on mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after recent and remote myocardial infarction , 1996, The Lancet.

[16]  M. Gold,et al.  The Effect of Procainamide on T Wave Alternans , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[17]  M. Simson.  Use of Signals in the Terminal QRS Complex to Identify Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction , 1981, Circulation.

[18]  J. Ruskin,et al.  Electrical alternans and vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  R J Cohen,et al.  T Wave Alternans as a Predictor of Recurrent Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in ICD Recipients: Prospective Comparison with Conventional Risk Markers , 1998, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[20]  N. Sammel,et al.  Late potentials detected after myocardial infarction: natural history and prognostic significance. , 1986, Circulation.

[21]  J P Miller,et al.  The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction. , 1984, Circulation.

[22]  A. Camm,et al.  Randomised trial of effect of amiodarone on mortality in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction after recent myocardial infarction: EMIAT , 1997, The Lancet.

[23]  Michael E. Cain,et al.  Signal-averaged electrocardiography , 1996 .

[24]  W. Rogers,et al.  Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  S L Winters,et al.  A new noninvasive index to predict sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden death in the first year after myocardial infarction: based on signal-averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ejection fraction and Holter monitoring. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.