Dissociation of sensory facilitation and decision bias in statistical learning

ABSTRACT The detection of regularities in the sensory environment, known as statistical learning, is an important brain function that has been observed in many experimental contexts. In these experiments, statistical learning of patterned sensory stimulation leads to improvements in the speed and/or accuracy with which subsequent stimuli are recognized. That is, statistical learning facilitates the transformation of sensory stimuli into motor responses, but the mechanism by which this occurs is unclear. Statistical learning could improve the efficiency of sensory processing, or it could bias responses toward particular outcomes. The distinction is important, as these different hypotheses imply different functions and different neural substrates for statistical learning. Here we address this problem by studying statistical learning as a decision-making process, which allows us to leverage the extensive computational literature on this topic. Specifically we describe a method for applying the Diffusion Decision Model (DDM) to isolate different sensory and cognitive processes associated with decision-making. The results indicate that statistical learning improves performance on a visual learning task in two distinct ways: by altering the efficiency of sensory processing and by introducing biases in the decision-making process. By fitting the parameters of the DDM to data from individual subjects, we find that the prominence of these two factors differed substantially across the population, and that these differences were predictive of individual performance on the psychophysical task. Overall, these results indicate that different cognitive processes can be recruited by statistical learning, and that the DDM is a powerful framework for detecting these influences.

[1]  B. Scholl,et al.  Multidimensional Visual Statistical Learning Visual Statistical Learning , 2005 .

[2]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Sarah C. Creel,et al.  Distant melodies: statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in tone sequences. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  L. Stone,et al.  Effects of Prior Information and Reward on Oculomotor and Perceptual Choices , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  The role of V1 surround suppression in MT motion integration. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Rapidly learned stimulus expectations alter perception of motion. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[7]  N. Turk-Browne,et al.  Attention Is Spontaneously Biased Toward Regularities , 2013, Psychological science.

[8]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Barbara Landau,et al.  The Necessity of the Medial Temporal Lobe for Statistical Learning , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Michael J. Constantino,et al.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations , 2008 .

[11]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Statistical Learning Within and Between Modalities Pitting Abstract Against Stimulus-Specific Representations , 2022 .

[12]  A. Voss,et al.  Diffusion models in experimental psychology: a practical introduction. , 2013, Experimental psychology.

[13]  Andreas Voss,et al.  Fast-dm: A free program for efficient diffusion model analysis , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[14]  Jim M. Monti,et al.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Testing assumptions of statistical learning: Is it long-term and implicit? , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  Matthew R. Krause,et al.  Contextual modulation and stimulus selectivity in extrastriate cortex , 2014, Vision Research.

[17]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in the newborn infant , 2011, Cognition.

[18]  Lauren V. Kustner,et al.  Shaping of Object Representations in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe Based on Temporal Regularities , 2012, Current Biology.

[19]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[20]  A. Voss,et al.  Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  The effect of statistical learning on internal stimulus representations: Predictable items are enhanced even when not predicted , 2013, Cognition.

[22]  Alexa R. Romberg,et al.  Statistical learning and language acquisition. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[23]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Bayesian learning of visual chunks by human observers , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Michael L. Platt,et al.  Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex , 1999, Nature.

[25]  Andrew J. Kelly,et al.  Implicit learning of predictive relationships in three-element visual sequences by young and old adults. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Richard Coppola,et al.  Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit anticipation during statistical learning , 2014, Neuroscience Letters.

[28]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  Neural Evidence of Statistical Learning: Efficient Detection of Visual Regularities Without Awareness , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  B. Scholl,et al.  The Automaticity of Visual Statistical Learning Statistical Learning , 2005 .

[30]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies among nonlinguistic sounds , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  Jessica F. Hay,et al.  Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants. , 2009, Child development.

[32]  Carl R Olson,et al.  Statistical Learning of Serial Visual Transitions by Neurons in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  P. Reber The neural basis of implicit learning and memory: A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  R. Aslin,et al.  Encoding multielement scenes: statistical learning of visual feature hierarchies. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  E. Newport,et al.  Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  C. Olson,et al.  Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[38]  P. Berkes,et al.  Statistically Optimal Perception and Learning: from Behavior to Neural Representations , 2022 .

[39]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The Neural Substrate of Prior Information in Perceptual Decision Making: A Model-Based Analysis , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[40]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  C. Summerfield,et al.  Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[43]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Implicit Perceptual Anticipation Triggered by Statistical Learning , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Per B Sederberg,et al.  Scene Representations in Parahippocampal Cortex Depend on Temporal Context , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Statistical Learning Using Real-World Scenes Extracting Categorical Regularities Without Conscious Intent , 2022 .

[46]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[47]  M. Goldsmith,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .

[48]  T Allison,et al.  Contextual guidance of attention: human intracranial event-related potential evidence for feedback modulation in anatomically early temporally late stages of visual processing. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[49]  G. Rees,et al.  The Neural Bases of Multistable Perception , 2022 .

[50]  Mark F. Bear,et al.  Learned spatiotemporal sequence recognition and prediction in primary visual cortex , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  R. Aslin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article UNSUPERVISED STATISTICAL LEARNING OF HIGHER-ORDER SPATIAL STRUCTURES FROM VISUAL SCENES , 2022 .

[52]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[53]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  Right Hemisphere Dominance in Visual Statistical Learning , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  Francis Tuerlinckx,et al.  Fitting the ratcliff diffusion model to experimental data , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[55]  R. Hess,et al.  What causes non-monotonic tuning of fMRI response to noisy images? , 2002, Current Biology.

[56]  E. Newport,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article INCIDENTAL LANGUAGE LEARNING: Ustening (and Learning) out of the Comer of Your Ear , 2022 .

[57]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Visual and Anticipatory Bias in Three Cortical Eye Fields of the Monkey during an Adaptive Decision-Making Task , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[59]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual cueing of visual attention , 2022 .

[60]  B. Balas,et al.  Personal Familiarity Influences the Processing of Upright and Inverted Faces in Infants , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[61]  Greg O. Horne,et al.  Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[62]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.