A Haptic Display for Robotic Rehabilitation of Stroke

The effects of stroke are debilitating on the American population. Past studies of robot-aided motor training for survivors have proven to be effective in upper limb motor recovery. However, survivors also suffer from loss or impairment of sensation. Sensory impairment is an important predictor for motor recovery of stroke survivors. Studies have suggested that sensory inputs during robot-aided motor training might be critical for the creation and promotion of cortical reconstruction due to brain plasticity during post-stroke recovery. This paper presents a new haptic display for the handle of the inMotion2 robot in order to enhance cutaneous sensory inputs for stroke survivors during hand motion. The sensory enhancement is realized through pins attached to servomotors mounted inside the robot handle that vibrate and contact the middle and index fingers, the palm, and the thumb during motor training. Each servomotor is independently controlled using a computer via parallel port with a field programmable gate array (FPGA) board as the hardware interface.

[1]  J. Feigenson,et al.  Factors Influencing Outcome and Length of Stay in a Stroke Rehabilitation Unit: Part 2. Comparison of 318 Screened and 248 Unscreened Patients , 1977, Stroke.

[2]  L. Ada,et al.  A kinematic analysis of recovery of the ability to stand up following stroke. , 1992, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[3]  S J Phillips,et al.  Incidence rates of stroke in the eighties: the end of the decline in stroke? , 1989, Stroke.

[4]  G. Leijon,et al.  Central post-stroke pain — a study of the mechanisms through analyses of the sensory abnormalities , 1989, Pain.

[5]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  MIT-MANUS: a workstation for manual therapy and training. I , 1992, [1992] Proceedings IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication.

[6]  T. Olsen,et al.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  C. Richards,et al.  Use of an intensive task-oriented gait training program in a series of patients with acute cerebrovascular accidents. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[9]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robotic assist devices for bimanual physical therapy: preliminary experiments , 1993 .

[10]  J. Feigenson,et al.  Factors Influencing Outcome and Length of Stay in a Stroke Rehabilitation Unit Part 1. Analysis of 248 Unscreened Patients ‐Medical and Functional Prognostic Indicators , 1977, Stroke.

[11]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  Some basic issues in teletaction , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  C. Giuliani.  Strength training for patients with neurological disorders , 1995 .

[13]  C. J. White,et al.  Robotic orthosis for stroke patient rehabilitation , 1993, Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Societ.

[14]  P. Duncan,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation: The Recovery of Motor Control , 1987 .

[15]  N. Hogan,et al.  The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[16]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Functional reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in adult owl monkeys after behaviorally controlled tactile stimulation. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  A. Prevo,et al.  The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[18]  Manuel Montero-Odasso,et al.  Noise-enhanced vibrotactile sensitivity in older adults, patients with stroke, and patients with diabetic neuropathy. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  B. Nilsson,et al.  The relationship between sensory impairment and motor recovery in patients with hemiplegia. , 1985, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[20]  E. Taub,et al.  Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. , 1999, Stroke.

[21]  S. Wolf,et al.  Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients , 1989, Experimental Neurology.

[22]  Christopher R. Wagner,et al.  A tactile shape display using RC servomotors , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[23]  R L Hewer,et al.  Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[24]  G. Recanzone,et al.  Progressive improvement in discriminative abilities in adult owl monkeys performing a tactile frequency discrimination task. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.