Improving the efficiency of 3U CubeSat EPS by selecting operating conditions for power converters

CubeSat is a nanosatellite platform that provides access to space for small payloads. It is an attractive solution for space exploration missions as it reduces cost and development time. However, size constraints restrict the surface area for solar panels and thus the generated power. The efficiency of the power condition modules of the electrical power system (EPS) is a relevant feature in the design of a CubeSat. One of the parameters that defines the efficiency of the power converters is their operating input and output voltages; these voltages are given by the array configurations of solar cells and battery cells according to the number of series or parallel connected cells. Therefore, we selected four solar array and battery package combinations for a 3U CubeSat with body mounted solar cells and compared losses and efficiency of the converter by calculation and experimentation. The results reveal that the highest efficiency values for load power values between 0.7W and 7W are about 98% for input voltage of 7.5V and output voltage of 6.6V. The best array configuration is derived due to these results: two string of three serial connected solar cells and a stack of two batteries in serial connection. These results allow us to design an efficient electrical power system for a 3U CubeSat; thus, the loads and the batteries received most of the provided energy by the solar array.

[1]  W. Eberle,et al.  A Practical Switching Loss Model for Buck Voltage Regulators , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[2]  Jean Bester,et al.  Electrical power system for a 3U CubeSat nanosatellite incorporating peak power tracking with dual redundant control , 2012 .

[3]  Eduardo I. Ortiz-Rivera,et al.  Comparison of Maximum Power Point Techniques in Electrical Power Systems of CubeSats , 2013 .

[4]  Toni Lopez,et al.  Quantification of Power MOSFET Losses in a Synchronous Buck Converter , 2007, APEC 07 - Twenty-Second Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition.

[5]  Mladen Knezic,et al.  Analytical power losses model of boost rectifier , 2014 .

[6]  Jesus Gonzalez-Llorente,et al.  Comparison of Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques in Electrical Power Systems of Cubesats , 2013 .

[7]  Robert S. Balog,et al.  Survey of modelling techniques used in optimisation of power electronic components , 2014 .

[8]  D. G. Lamar,et al.  An Insight into the Switching Process of Power MOSFETs: An Improved Analytical Losses Model , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[9]  Fred C. Lee,et al.  Optimizing design for low voltage DC-DC converters , 1997, Proceedings of APEC 97 - Applied Power Electronics Conference.

[10]  Robert W. Erickson,et al.  DC-DC converter design for battery-operated systems , 1995, Proceedings of PESC '95 - Power Electronics Specialist Conference.

[11]  Regina Lee,et al.  Characterization of Lithium-Polymer batteries for CubeSat applications , 2011 .

[12]  Robert W. Erickson,et al.  Fundamentals of Power Electronics , 2001 .

[13]  Robert W. Erickson,et al.  High Efficiency DC-DC Converters for Battery- Operated Systems with Energy Management , 1999 .

[14]  Ferdinando Tonicello,et al.  Buck Boost Regulator (B2R) for spacecraft Solar Array Power conversion , 2010, 2010 Twenty-Fifth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC).

[15]  J. Arau,et al.  Multi-mode synchronous buck converter with non-uniform current distribution for portable applications , 2008, 2008 11th IEEE International Power Electronics Congress.