Objective index of image fidelity for JPEG2000 compressed body CT images.

Compression ratio (CR) has been the de facto standard index of compression level for medical images. The aim of the study is to evaluate the CR, peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and a perceptual quality metric (high-dynamic range visual difference predictor HDR-VDP) as objective indices of image fidelity for Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) 2000 compressed body computed tomography (CT) images, from the viewpoint of visually lossless compression approach. A total of 250 body CT images obtained with five different scan protocols (5-mm-thick abdomen, 0.67-mm-thick abdomen, 5-mm-thick lung, 0.67-mm-thick lung, and 5-mm-thick low-dose lung) were compressed to one of five CRs (reversible, 6:1, 8:1, 10:1, and 15:1). The PSNR and HDR-VDP values were calculated for the 250 pairs of the original and compressed images. By alternately displaying an original and its compressed image on the same monitor, five radiologists independently determined if the pair was distinguishable or indistinguishable. The kappa statistic for the interobserver agreement among the five radiologists' responses was 0.70. According to the radiologists' responses, the number of distinguishable image pairs tended to significantly differ among the five scan protocols at 6:1-10:1 compressions (Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact tests). Spearman's correlation coefficients between each of the CR, PSNR, and HDR-VDP and the number of radiologists who responded as distinguishable were 0.72, -0.77, and 0.85, respectively. Using the radiologists' pooled responses as the reference standards, the areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic curves for the CR, PSNR, and HDR-VDP were 0.87, 0.93, and 0.97, respectively, showing significant differences between the CR and PSNR (p = 0.04), or HDR-VDP (p < 0.001), and between the PSNR and HDR-VDP (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the CR is less suitable than the PSNR or HDR-VDP as an objective index of image fidelity for JPEG2000 compressed body CT images. The HDR-VDP is more promising than the PSNR as such an index.

[1]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  P R Mueller,et al.  CT colonography with teleradiology: effect of lossy wavelet compression on polyp detection--initial observations. , 2001, Radiology.

[3]  Edward Muka,et al.  Irreversible JPEG compression of digital chest radiographs for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold. , 2003, Radiology.

[4]  Heung-Sik Kang,et al.  Regional difference in compression artifacts in low-dose chest CT images: effects of mathematical and perceptual factors. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Helen Hong,et al.  Managing the CT Data Explosion: Initial Experiences of Archiving Volumetric Datasets in a Mini-PACS , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[7]  G S Gazelle,et al.  Focal hepatic lesions: effect of three-dimensional wavelet compression on detection at CT. , 1997, Radiology.

[8]  Quick Rf.  A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. , 1974 .

[9]  Yasunari Yokota,et al.  Facilitation of perceptual filling-in for spatio-temporal frequency of dynamic textures , 2005 .

[10]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT: difference in tolerance between thin- and thick-section images. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  The impact of image information on compressibility and degradation in medical image compression. , 2006, Medical physics.

[12]  E. Krupinski,et al.  Anniversary paper: evaluation of medical imaging systems. , 2008, Medical physics.

[13]  R A Olshen,et al.  Thoracic CT images: effect of lossy image compression on diagnostic accuracy. , 1994, Radiology.

[14]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  JPEG2000 compression of thin-section CT images of the lung: effect of compression ratio on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[15]  Viv Bewick,et al.  Statistics review 13: Receiver operating characteristic curves , 2004, Critical care.

[16]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression , 1998, Signal Process..

[18]  J. Fleiss,et al.  The Reliability of Dichotomous Judgments: Unequal Numbers of Judges per Subject , 1979 .

[19]  Henry Rusinek,et al.  Computed Tomography Diagnosis Utilizing Compressed Image Data: An ROC Analysis Using Acute Appendicitis as a Model , 2002, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[20]  Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop,et al.  Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality. , 2007, Radiology.

[21]  Bo Hyoung Kim,et al.  Irreversible JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold , 2006, European Radiology.

[22]  Thomas Richter,et al.  JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images. , 2009, Medical physics.

[23]  S Sone,et al.  Effects of JPEG and wavelet compression of spiral low-dose ct images on detection of small lung cancers. , 2001, Acta radiologica.

[24]  Henry Rusinek,et al.  Effect of CT image compression on computer-assisted lung nodule volume measurement. , 2005, Radiology.

[25]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Regional variance of visually lossless threshold in compressed chest CT images: lung versus mediastinum and chest wall. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[26]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Definition of compression ratio: difference between two commercial JPEG2000 program libraries. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[27]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images using a perceptual image quality metric. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[28]  A. Watson,et al.  A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[29]  Yoshimitsu Ohgiya,et al.  Acute cerebral infarction: effect of JPEG compression on detection at CT. , 2003, Radiology.

[30]  Henry Rusinek,et al.  Wavelet compression of low-dose chest CT data: effect on lung nodule detection. , 2003, Radiology.

[31]  Wenjun Zeng,et al.  An overview of the visual optimization tools in JPEG 2000 , 2002, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[32]  A. Manduca,et al.  Wavelet compression of medical images. , 1998, Radiology.

[33]  Sridha Sridharan,et al.  Gaze-J2K: Gaze-influenced image voding using eye trackers and JPEG 2000 , 2006 .