An underwater optical wireless communication network

The growing need for underwater observation and sub-sea monitoring systems has stimulated considerable interest in advancing the enabling technologies of underwater wireless communication and underwater sensor networks. This communication technology is expected to play an important role in investigating climate change, in monitoring biological, bio-geochemical, evolutionary and ecological changes in the sea, ocean and lake environments and in helping to control and maintain oil production facilities and harbors using unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs), submarines, ships, buoys, and divers. However, the present technology of underwater acoustic communication cannot provide the high data rate required to investigate and monitor these environments and facilities. Optical wireless communication has been proposed as the best alternative to meet this challenge. We present models of three kinds of optical wireless communication links a) a line-of-sight link, b) a modulating retro-reflector link and c) a reflective link, all of which can provide the required data rate. We analyze the link performance based on these models. From the analysis, it is clear that as the water absorption increases, the communication performance decreases dramatically for the three link types. However, by using the scattered lighted it was possible to mitigate this decrease in some cases. We conclude from the analysis that a high data rate underwater optical wireless network is a feasible solution for emerging applications such as UUV to UUV links and networks of sensors, and extended ranges in these applications could be achieved by applying a multi-hop concept.

[1]  M. Lewis,et al.  Optical oceanography: Recent advances and future directions using global remote sensing and in situ observations , 2006 .

[2]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[3]  Shlomi Arnon,et al.  Optical plankton: an optical oceanic probing scheme , 2007 .

[4]  F. Hanson,et al.  High bandwidth underwater optical communication. , 2008, Applied optics.

[5]  D. Rus,et al.  An Underwater Sensor Network with Dual Communications, Sensing, and Mobility , 2007, OCEANS 2007 - Europe.

[6]  J. H. Smart,et al.  Underwater optical communications systems part 1: variability of water optical parameters , 2005, MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[7]  N Gisin,et al.  23 25 v 1 [ qu an tph ] 1 6 Ju l 2 00 7 SiPM used as fast Photon-Counting Module and for Multiphoton Detection , 2008 .

[8]  Linda Mullen,et al.  Backscatter suppression for underwater modulating retroreflector links using polarization discrimination. , 2009, Applied optics.

[9]  Yuan Li,et al.  Research challenges and applications for underwater sensor networking , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[10]  Sermsak Jaruwatanadilok,et al.  Underwater Wireless Optical Communication Channel Modeling and Performance Evaluation using Vector Radiative Transfer Theory , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[11]  I. Bankman,et al.  Underwater optical communications systems. Part 2: basic design considerations , 2005, MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[12]  B. Cochenour,et al.  Spatial and temporal dispersion in high bandwidth underwater laser communication links , 2008, MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[13]  Shlomi Arnon,et al.  Non-line-of-sight underwater optical wireless communication network. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  Shlomi Arnon,et al.  Subsea ultraviolet solar-blind broadband free-space optics communication , 2009 .