A comparison of MV Distribution System State Estimation methods using field data

This paper compares the performance of five different Distribution System State Estimation (DSSE) methods, using field data taken from a European MV distribution network. The performance of each method is assessed in terms of its solution accuracy, robustness to noise and input measurement uncertainty, and ability to identify bad data and network topology errors. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are discussed with regard to their application to static state estimation in MV distribution systems, where the quantity and quality of available network measurements is typically low. The Weighted Least Squares (WLS) approach is by far the most widely-used method in this context. However, the results from this study demonstrate that Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) techniques have significant advantages, particularly in terms of their ability to handle various types of input data errors. The performance of robust solution methods for distribution system state estimation is also compared.

[1]  A. Monticelli Estimation Based on Multiple Scans of Measurements , 1999 .

[2]  Jianzhong Wu,et al.  A robust state estimator for medium voltage distribution networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  A. Monticelli State estimation in electric power systems : a generalized approach , 1999 .

[4]  Milan Prodanovic,et al.  SHORT-TERM OPERATIONAL PLANNING AND STATE ESTIMATION IN POWER DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS , 2014 .

[5]  A. P. A. D. Silva,et al.  State forecasting in electric power systems , 1983 .

[6]  Bikash C. Pal,et al.  Real Time Estimation of Loads in Radial and Unsymmetrical Three-Phase Distribution Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Milan Prodanovic,et al.  A Closed-Loop State Estimation Tool for MV Network Monitoring and Operation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[8]  Jing Huang,et al.  Electric grid state estimators for distribution systems with microgrids , 2012, 2012 46th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS).

[9]  Balasubramaniam Natarajan,et al.  Distribution Grid State Estimation from Compressed Measurements , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[10]  Bikash C. Pal,et al.  Choice of estimator for distribution system state estimation , 2009 .

[11]  Goran Strbac,et al.  A Recursive Bayesian Approach for Identification of Network Configuration Changes in Distribution System State Estimation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Ignacio Hernando-Gil,et al.  Optimal Power Flow for Maximizing Network Benefits From Demand-Side Management , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  G. Strbac,et al.  Distribution System State Estimation Using an Artificial Neural Network Approach for Pseudo Measurement Modeling , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Milan Prodanovic,et al.  State Estimation Techniques for Electric Power Distribution Systems , 2014, 2014 European Modelling Symposium.

[15]  J.C.S. de Souza,et al.  Forecasting-Aided State Estimation—Part I: Panorama , 2009 .