In this study it is shown that the performance of a statistical method for detection of microcalcification clusters in digital mammograms, can be improved substantially by using a second step of classification. During this second step, detected clusters are automatically classified into true positive and false positive detected clusters. For classification the k-nearest neighbor method was used in a leave-one-patient-out procedure. The sensitivity level of the method was adjusted both in the first detection step as in the second classification step. The Mahalanobis distance was used as criterion in the sequential forward selection procedure for selection of features. This primary feature selection method was combined with a classification performance criterion for the final feature selection. By applying the initial detection at various levels of sensitivity, various sets of false and true positive detected clusters were created. At each of these sets the classification ca be performed. Results show that the overall best FROC performance after secondary classification is obtained by varying sensitivity levels in both the first and second step. Furthermore, it was shown that performing a new feature selection for each different set of false and true positives is essential. A large database of 245 digitized mammograms with 341 clusters was used for evaluation of the method.
[1]
Anil K. Jain.
Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing
,
2018,
Control of Color Imaging Systems.
[2]
Paul Scheunders,et al.
Classification of Microcalcifications Using Texture-Based Features
,
1998,
Digital Mammography / IWDM.
[3]
Nico Karssemeijer,et al.
Improved Correction for Signal Dependent Noise Applied to Automatic Detection of Microcalcifications
,
1998,
Digital Mammography / IWDM.
[4]
N. Karssemeijer,et al.
Influence of segmentation on classification of microcalcifications in digital mammography
,
1996,
Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.
[5]
N Karssemeijer,et al.
Spatial Resolution in Digital Mammography
,
1993,
Investigative radiology.
[6]
N Karssemeijer,et al.
Accurate segmentation and contrast measurement of microcalcifications in mammograms: a phantom study.
,
1998,
Medical physics.
[7]
K Doi,et al.
Analysis of methods for reducing false positives in the automated detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
,
1998,
Medical physics.