Stereotypes, Negativity Bias, and the Discussion of Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups

Previous research demonstrates that groups are more likely to discuss information shared by all group members than information known by only one group member (i.e., unshared information). It was hypothesized in this study that stereotypic expectancies and the negativity bias (i.e., the tendency to use negative information more than positive information) made groups less likely to overlook unshared information. Resultsfrom Experiment I indicate that a stereotype was activated and resulted in individuals rating a male applicant higher than a female applicantfora masculine gender-typedposition. No effectsforstereotypic expectancies were found in the group decision-making task (Experiment 2), but the negativity bias wasfound to increase the discussion of both shared and unshared information. The implicationsforfuture research are considered.

[1]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[2]  G. Bodenhausen Stereotypic biases in social decision making and memory: testing process models of stereotype use. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Sex stereotypes and social judgment , 1980 .

[4]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. , 1989 .

[5]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[6]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization , 1977 .

[8]  A. Hollingshead The Rank-Order Effect in Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[9]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[10]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: the impact of task complexity. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Management of information in small groups. , 1996 .

[12]  Herbert Solomon,et al.  Two models of group behavior in the solution of eureka-type problems , 1955 .

[13]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Human cognition in its social context. , 1986, Psychological review.

[14]  G. Stasser,et al.  Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. , 1987 .

[15]  Donal E. Carlston,et al.  Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. , 1989 .

[16]  Anne Locksley,et al.  Social stereotypes and judgments of individuals: An instance of the base-rate fallacy , 1982 .

[17]  Garold Stasser,et al.  Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making , 1988 .

[18]  P. Kim When What You KnowCanHurt You: A Study of Experiential Effects on Group Discussion and Performance , 1997 .

[19]  N. Anderson,et al.  An information integration analysis of attitude change in group discussion. , 1976 .

[20]  J. Klein,et al.  Negativity Effects in Impression Formation: A Test in the Political Arena , 1991 .

[21]  R. Vonk,et al.  The Negativity Effect in Trait Ratings and in Open-Ended Descriptions of Persons , 1993 .