Engaging for success: enhancing performance through employee engagement, a report to Government

Printed in the UK on recycled paper containing a minimum of 75% post consumer waste. The text in this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party material you will need to obtain permission from the parties concerned. The views expressed in this report are the authors' and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department or the Government. The authors are not responsible for any third party material. Original material for the case studies has been supplied by the organisations themselves and were chosen to reflect a range of sectors of the UK economy, but do not constitute a representative sample. This timely Report sets out for the first time the evidence that underpins what we all know intuitively, which is that only organisations that truly engage and inspire their employees produce world class levels of innovation, productivity and performance. The lessons that flow from that evidence can and should shape the way leaders and managers in both the private and public sectors think about the people who work for them. They should also shape the way employees approach their jobs and careers. A recession might seem an unusual time for such reflection – in fact, the opposite is the case. Because Britain's economic recovery and its competitive strengths in a global economy will be built on strong, innovative companies and confident employees, there has never been a more important time to think about employee engagement in Britain. This report helps take forward that debate. It sets out what government can do to help promote an understanding of just how much greater employee engagement can help improve innovation, performance and productivity across the economy. It launches a challenge that my department will take forward in the months ahead. 1 Introduction 1 We were asked by the then Secretary of State for Business in the autumn of 2008 to take an in-depth look at employee engagement and to report on its potential benefits for companies, organisations and individual employees. When the new Secretary of State, Lord Mandelson, met us in the spring, as the recession was biting, he encouraged us to examine in particular whether a wider take up of engagement approaches …

[1]  Alex Edmans,et al.  Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices , 2010 .

[2]  Gary W. Loveman,et al.  Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work , 1994 .

[3]  R. Silvestro,et al.  Applying the service profit chain to analyse retail performance , 2005 .

[4]  William A. Kahn Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work , 1990 .

[5]  R. Peccei,et al.  Partnership at Work: Mutuality and the Balance of Advantage , 2001 .

[6]  Kerrie L. Unsworth,et al.  Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas , 2000 .

[7]  Juani Swart,et al.  Understanding the people and performance link: Unlocking the black box , 2003 .

[8]  E. Soane,et al.  Employee engagement in context , 2008 .

[9]  J. Storey,et al.  The Routledge Companion to Strategic Human Resource Management , 2008 .

[10]  A. Saks Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement , 2006 .

[11]  B. Fredrickson What Good Are Positive Emotions? , 1998, Review of general psychology : journal of Division 1, of the American Psychological Association.

[12]  B. Fredrickson,et al.  Positive Emotions Trigger Upward Spirals Toward Emotional Well-Being , 2002, Psychological science.

[13]  H. Murlis,et al.  Engage Employees and Boost Performance , 2001 .

[14]  Gemma Robertson-Smith,et al.  Employee Engagement A review of current thinking , 2009 .

[15]  Henry Mintzberg Rebuilding Companies as Communities , 2009 .

[16]  Kusum Sahdev Downsizing and survivor syndrome : a study of HR's perception of survivors' responses , 1998 .

[17]  J. Alban‐Metcalfe Engaging leadership Creating organisations that maximise the potential of their people Shaping the FUTURE , 2022 .

[18]  W. Brogden Annual Review of Psychology , 1957 .

[19]  C. Hales Rooted in Supervision, Branching into Management: Continuity and Change in the Role of First-Line Manager , 2005 .

[20]  James K. Harter,et al.  Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  Emma Soane,et al.  Working life: employee attitudes and engagement 2006 , 2006 .

[22]  J. Hobson Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-Being? , 2007 .

[23]  Michael Terry Can `Partnership' Reverse the Decline of British Trade Unions? , 2003 .

[24]  G. Waddell,et al.  Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-being? , 2006 .

[25]  Emma Soane,et al.  EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2008, Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Economics.

[26]  Michael A. West,et al.  The link between the management of employees and patient mortality in acute hospitals , 2002 .

[27]  T D Wall,et al.  Work characteristics and employee well-being within a context of strategic downsizing. , 1997, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[28]  Mark Stuart,et al.  Partnership and Modernisation in Employment Relations , 2005 .

[29]  Kathleen Franzinger In a league of their own , 2002 .

[30]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles? , 2006 .

[31]  John Kelly Social partnership agreements in Britain , 2005 .

[32]  I. Fulmer,et al.  ARE THE 100 BEST BETTER? AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BEING A “GREAT PLACE TO WORK” AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[33]  Job matching in the Uk and Europe , 2007 .

[34]  James K. Harter,et al.  Manage your human sigma , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[35]  S. Parker,et al.  Is Behavioral Engagement a Distinct and Useful Construct? , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[36]  S. Parker Longitudinal effects of lean production on employee outcomes and the mediating role of work characteristics. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  John St Aubyn,et al.  Crown copyright , 1988 .

[38]  William A. Kahn To Be Fully There: Psychological Presence at Work , 1992 .

[39]  ‘Nature has no outline, but imagination has’ contrasting executive renditions of the ‘commitment to innovation’ , 2009 .

[40]  R. Chun,et al.  To Thine Own Staff Be Agreeable , 2007 .

[41]  Adrian John Wilkinson,et al.  Partnership and Voice, with or without trade unions: Changing UK management approaches to organisational participation , 2005 .

[42]  M. Marchington,et al.  IMPROVING HEALTH THROUGH HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT The process of engagement and alignment , 2008 .

[43]  F. Herzberg One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees? , 2008 .

[44]  Sarah Oxenbridge,et al.  Achieving a New Equilibrium? The Stability of Cooperative Employer-Union Relationships , 2004 .

[45]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  THE IMPACT OF HUMAN RESOURCE AND OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON COMPANY PRODUCTIVITY: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY , 2008 .