The knee in full flexion: an anatomical study.

There has been only one limited report dating from 1941 using dissection which has described the tibiofemoral joint between 120 degrees and 160 degrees of flexion despite the relevance of this arc to total knee replacement. We now provide a full description having examined one living and eight cadaver knees using MRI, dissection and previously published cryosections in one knee. In the range of flexion from 120 degrees to 160 degrees the flexion facet centre of the medial femoral condyle moves back 5 mm and rises up on to the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. At 160 degrees the posterior horn is compressed in a synovial recess between the femoral cortex and the tibia. This limits flexion. The lateral femoral condyle also rolls back with the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus moving with the condyle. Both move down over the posterior tibia at 160 degrees of flexion. Neither the events between 120 degrees and 160 degrees nor the anatomy at 160 degrees could result from a continuation of the kinematics up to 120 degrees . Therefore hyperflexion is a separate arc. The anatomical and functional features of this arc suggest that it would be difficult to design an implant for total knee replacement giving physiological movement from 0 degrees to 160 degrees .

[1]  E. Pernkopf Topographische Anatomie des Menschen : Lehrbuch und Atlas der regionär-stratigraphischen Präparation , 1937 .

[2]  Y Yamano,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  M S Hefzy,et al.  Kinematics of the knee joint in deep flexion: a radiographic assessment. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  Harry E Rubash,et al.  Kinematics of the knee at high flexion angles: An in vitro investigation , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  V Pinskerova,et al.  The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  V. Pinskerova,et al.  Does the femur rollback with flexion ? , 2004 .

[7]  Jiang Yao,et al.  Magnetic resonance image analysis of meniscal translation and tibio‐menisco‐femoral contact in deep knee flexion , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  V Pinskerova,et al.  Does the femur roll-back with flexion? , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  V. Pinskerova,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee , 2000 .

[10]  V Pinskerova,et al.  The movement of the knee studied by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  V. Pinskerova,et al.  The posterior cruciate ligament during flexion of the normal knee. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  A. Williams,et al.  Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee. A study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using 'interventional' MRI. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  V Pinskerova,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  O. Brantigan,et al.  THE MECHANICS OF THE LIGAMENTS AND MENISCI OF THE KNEE JOINT , 1941 .