Mixed-List Phonological Similarity Effects in Delayed Serial Recall.

Abstract Recent experiments have shown that placing dissimilar items on lists of phonologically similar items enhances accuracy of ordered recall of the dissimilar items [Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2003). Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29 , 838–849.]. Two explanations have been offered for this effect: an encoding explanation, in which items similar to current memory contents are given less encoding weight and offer less competition for recall; and a retrieval explanation, which suggests that the long-term similarity structure of the items leads to dissimilar items being more distinct on mixed lists. These theories are compared in an experiment in which a filled delay was introduced between study and test. Simulations show the prominent enhancing effects of similarity after a delay are captured by a model that assumes encoding is sensitive to the similarity of items to other list items [Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2002). An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9 , 59–79.], but are not handled by a retrieval model [the Start–End Model; Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: the Start–End Model. Cognitive Psychology, 36 , 73–137. ].

[1]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[2]  B. Efron,et al.  A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and , 1983 .

[3]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[5]  Jay I. Myung,et al.  Assessing the distinguishability of models and the informativeness of data , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  A J Hull,et al.  A letter-digit matrix of auditory confusions. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[7]  D. Norris,et al.  The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall. , 1998, Psychological review.

[8]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[9]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Phonological Similarity in Serial Recall: Constraints on Theories of Memory. , 2008 .

[10]  R. Shepard Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space , 1957 .

[11]  W A Wickelgren,et al.  Short-term memory for phonemically similar lists. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.

[12]  A D Baddeley,et al.  Short-term Memory for Word Sequences as a Function of Acoustic, Semantic and Formal Similarity , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  N. Burgess Memory for Serial Order : A Network Model of the Phonological Loop and its Timing , 1999 .

[14]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[16]  D. Luce,et al.  Detection and Recognition " ' , 2006 .

[17]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  Introduction to neural networks , 1995, The Lancet.

[18]  E. Bjork,et al.  Short-term order and item retention. , 1974 .

[19]  A D Baddeley,et al.  How Does Acoustic Similarity Influence Short-Term Memory? , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  R. Henson Short-Term Memory for Serial Order: The Start-End Model , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Acoustic similarity and retroactive interference in short-term memory , 1965 .

[22]  G D Brown,et al.  Oscillator-based memory for serial order. , 2000, Psychological review.

[23]  D. Norris,et al.  THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49A (1), 80 ± 115 Unchained Memory: Error Patterns Rule out Chaining Models of Immediate Serial Recall , 2022 .

[24]  R. O’Reilly Six principles for biologically based computational models of cortical cognition , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  A redintegration account of the effects of speech rate, lexicality, and word frequency in immediate serial recall , 2000, Psychological research.

[26]  N. Burgess,et al.  Temporal Grouping Effects in Immediate Recall: A Working Memory Analysis , 1996 .

[27]  J. S. Nairne A feature model of immediate memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[28]  R. Conrad,et al.  Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. , 1964 .

[29]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[30]  S. Lewandowsky Redintegration and Response Suppression in Serial Recall: A Dynamic Network Model , 1999 .

[31]  Redintegration and response suppression in serial recall , 1999 .

[32]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[33]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Reversing the phonological similarity effect , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Retroactive effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall from short-term memory. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Rna Henson,et al.  Short-term memory for serial order. , 2001 .

[36]  Richard N. Henson,et al.  Computational models of short-term memory: Modelling serial recall of verbal material , 2001 .