“Win at Home and Draw Away”: Automatic Formation Analysis Highlighting the Differences in Home and Away Team Behaviors

In terms of analyzing soccer matches, two of the most important factors to consider are: 1) the formation the team played (e.g., 4-4-2, 4-2-3-1, 3-5-2 etc.), and 2) the manner in which they executed it (e.g., conservative sitting deep, or aggressive pressing high). Despite the existence of ball and player tracking data, no current methods exist which can automatically detect and visualize formations. Using an entire season of Prozone data which consists of ball and player tracking information from a recent top-tier professional league, we showcase an automatic formation detection method by investigating the “home advantage”. In a paper we published recently, using an entire season of ball tracking data we showed that home teams had significantly more possession in the forward-third which correlated with more shots and goals while the shooting and passing proficiencies were the same. Using our automatic formation analysis, we extend this analysis and show that while teams tend to play the same formation at home as they do away, the manner in which they execute the formation is significantly different. Specifically, we show that the position of the formation of teams at home is significantly higher up the field compared to when they play away. This conservative approach at away games suggests that coaches aim to win their home games and draw their away games. Additionally, we also show that our method can visually summarize a game which gives an indication of dominance and tactics. While enabling new discoveries of team behavior which can enhance analysis, it is also worth mentioning that our automatic formation detection method is the first to be developed.

[1]  H. Kuhn The Hungarian method for the assignment problem , 1955 .

[2]  Katta G. Murty,et al.  Letter to the Editor - An Algorithm for Ranking all the Assignments in Order of Increasing Cost , 1968, Oper. Res..

[3]  Ingemar J. Cox,et al.  On Finding Ranked Assignments With Application to Multi-Target Tracking and Motion Correspondence , 1995 .

[4]  Aaron F. Bobick,et al.  A Framework for Recognizing Multi-Agent Action from Visual Evidence , 1999, AAAI/IAAI.

[5]  Simon Baker,et al.  Active Appearance Models Revisited , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  Mubarak Shah,et al.  Detecting group activities using rigidity of formation , 2005, MULTIMEDIA '05.

[7]  Jonathan M. Wilson,et al.  Inverting the pyramid : a history of football tactics , 2008 .

[8]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  You'll never walk alone: Modeling social behavior for multi-target tracking , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[9]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Group motion segmentation using a Spatio-Temporal Driving Force Model , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Yanxi Liu,et al.  Multi-target tracking of time-varying spatial patterns , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Kalpana C. Jondhale,et al.  Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts , 2010 .

[12]  Fernando Ramos,et al.  Tracking behaviours of cooperative robots within multi-agent domains , 2010 .

[13]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts , 2010, 2010 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology.

[14]  T. Moskowitz,et al.  Scorecasting: The Hidden Influences Behind How Sports Are Played and Games Are Won , 2011 .

[15]  Ivan Laptev,et al.  Data-driven crowd analysis in videos , 2011, ICCV.

[16]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Activity Forecasting , 2012, ECCV.

[17]  Xiaoming Liu,et al.  Group context learning for event recognition , 2012, 2012 IEEE Workshop on the Applications of Computer Vision (WACV).

[18]  Yaser Sheikh,et al.  Monocular Object Detection Using 3D Geometric Primitives , 2012, ECCV.

[19]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  An Introduction to Conditional Random Fields , 2010, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[20]  David Sally,et al.  The Numbers Game: Why Everything You Know About Soccer Is Wrong , 2013 .

[21]  Yanxi Liu,et al.  Tracking Sports Players with Context-Conditioned Motion Models , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[22]  Yaser Sheikh,et al.  Representing and Discovering Adversarial Team Behaviors Using Player Roles , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[23]  Peter Carr,et al.  Assessing team strategy using spatiotemporal data , 2013, KDD.