Biomechanical Analysis of Unilateral External Skeletal Fixators Combined with IM-Pin and Without IM-Pin Using Finite-Element Method.

OBJECTIVES To determine if a unilateral external skeletal fixator (ESF) with a carbon fiber connecting rod (IMEX SK) without an intramedullary (IM)-pin is mechanically comparable with a unilateral ESF with a stainless-steel connecting rod (IMEX KE) with an IM-pin. STUDY DESIGN Finite-element method (FEM)-computer simulation. METHODS FEM models were validated by comparison against data from mechanical testing. Three-dimensional FEM models of a femur with a mid-diaphyseal fracture with a 20 mm gap were developed with 4 unilateral external skeletal fixator devices (6-pin KE, 6-pin KE IM-pin, 6-pin SK, and 6-pin SK IM-pin). A 300 N load was applied to the femur at the proximal end in a direction of theta = 10 degrees distally and phi = 10 degrees laterally cranially. Relative displacements in x-, y- and z-directions at the gap were obtained and the overall stiffness was calculated as 300 N/total displacement. Load transfer at the pin-bone interface (PBI) was assessed by determining the von Mises stress maxima at the PBI-related nodes. RESULTS The 6-pin SK had superior mechanical performance compared with the 6-pin KE by exhibiting smaller displacements in all directions and higher stiffness. Compared with the 6-pin KE IM-pin, the 6-pin SK (without IM-pin) was superior in craniocaudal and lateromedial displacements, but inferior in axial displacements, overall stiffness and von Mises stress maxima. The 6-pin SK IM-pin was superior to the 6-pin KE IM-pin based on smaller displacements and higher stiffness. CONCLUSIONS Although the SK device had superior mechanical performance compared with a KE device in a unilateral configuration, the addition of an IM-pin continues to be a powerful method of enhancing mechanical performance of either IMEX SK or IMEX KE unilateral constructs in clinical cases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Based on the results of this FEM study we recommend the use of the "tied-in" IM-pin with the ESF clinically when striving for high rigidity. In less challenging situations, a unilateral SK ESF without IM-pin might provide sufficient rigidity for a successful fracture repair.

[1]  A Amirfazli,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis for tunnel placement and buttons in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  R. Welch,et al.  Influence of the connecting rod on the biomechanical properties of five external skeletal fixation configurations , 2003, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[3]  O. Lanz,et al.  Comminuted supracondylar humeral fractures repaired with a modified type I external skeletal fixator construct. , 1998, The Journal of small animal practice.

[4]  S. Budsberg,et al.  Validation of a finite element model of the Kirschner-Ehmer external skeletal fixation system. , 1999, American journal of veterinary research.

[5]  L Claes,et al.  A method to determine the 3-D stiffness of fracture fixation devices and its application to predict inter-fragmentary movement. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  L E Claes,et al.  Predictive value of bone mineral density and morphology determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography for cancellous bone strength of the proximal femur. , 2001, Bone.

[7]  E Y Chao,et al.  The early healing of tibial osteotomies stabilized by one-plane or two-plane external fixation. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  H. Paul,et al.  Evaluation of fixation devices for prevention of rotation in transverse fractures of the canine femoral shaft: an in vitro study. , 1984, American journal of veterinary research.

[9]  F L Drijber,et al.  Evaluation of linear finite-element analysis models' assumptions for external fixation devices. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  K. Kraus,et al.  Effect of a supplemental plate on the stiffness of a type I external fixator. , 2002, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[11]  Ron Shahar,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of the canine hind limb: calculation of forces during three-legged stance. , 2002, Veterinary journal.

[12]  D. Hulse,et al.  The Role of the External Bar in a 6-Pin Type 1 External Skeletal Fixation Device , 1993, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[13]  J. M. Kennedy,et al.  Long-term compressive property durability of carbon fibre-reinforced polyetheretherketone composite in physiological saline. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[14]  R M Rose,et al.  Global mechanical consequences of reduced cement/bone coupling rigidity in proximal femoral arthroplasty: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  J. Weiss,et al.  Bone Regeneration and Fracture Healing: Experience With Distraction Osteogenesis Model , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  R. Friedman,et al.  Mechanical properties and bone densities of canine trabecular bone , 1998, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[17]  P. Gregory Biomechanics in Orthopedic Trauma , 1994 .

[18]  P. Schwarz,et al.  Mechanical evaluation of half-pin (type 1) external skeletal fixation in combination with a single intramedullary pin. , 1992, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[19]  R. Welch,et al.  The SK™ external fixation system: description of components, instrumentation, and application techniques , 2003, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[20]  G. Brusewitz,et al.  An In Vitro Comparison of the Holding Strength of Partially Threaded vs Nonthreaded Intramedullary Pins , 1983 .

[21]  R. Palmer,et al.  Principles of bone healing and biomechanics of external skeletal fixation. , 1992, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[22]  R. Shahar Relative stiffness and stress of type I and type II external fixators: acrylic versus stainless-steel connecting bars--a theoretical approach. , 2000, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[23]  Guigen Zhang,et al.  Geometric and material nonlinearity in tensioned wires of an external fixator. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[24]  D. Aron,et al.  Finite element method evaluation: articulations and diagonals in an 8-pin type 1B external skeletal fixator. , 2000, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[25]  Dallman Mj,et al.  Rotational strength of double-pinning techniques in repair of transverse fractures in femurs of dogs. , 1990 .

[26]  P. Schwarz,et al.  Canine Osteotomy Healing when Stabilized with Decreasingly Rigid Fixation Compared to Constantly Rigid Fixation , 1993, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[27]  M. Markel,et al.  Ex vivo biomechanics of Kirschner-Ehmer external skeletal fixation applied to canine tibiae. , 1993, Veterinary surgery : VS.